Detroit neighborhoods face a potential public health crisis as hundreds of demolition sites may be backfilled with toxic debris. These sites, part of the city’s extensive demolition program, could contain hazardous substances like lead and asbestos, posing risks to residents. Despite previous instances of contamination and established protocols, the city’s response is under scrutiny, with experts questioning whether adequate measures were taken. The outgoing mayor downplayed the health threat, but critics argue the contamination poses a significant risk due to the nature of the toxins used.
Read More
A Minnesota jury has awarded $65.5 million to a mother of three who alleged Johnson & Johnson’s talcum products caused her mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure. The plaintiff claimed the company’s baby powder contained asbestos, despite Johnson & Johnson’s argument that their products are safe. This verdict is the latest in a series of legal battles regarding the safety of Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products. The company has stated its intention to appeal the decision.
Read More
A California jury recently awarded $40 million to two women who alleged Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder caused their ovarian cancer, finding the company failed to warn consumers despite knowing of the product’s dangers for years. The plaintiffs, who both used the product for decades, underwent extensive cancer treatments. Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the verdict, maintaining their products are safe and do not cause cancer, though they stopped selling the talc-based powder in the U.S. in 2020. The company faces tens of thousands of similar lawsuits and has previously attempted to resolve the litigation through bankruptcy, a strategy that has been unsuccessful.
Read More
The swift demolition of the White House’s East Wing has raised concerns from health advocates and Democratic lawmakers regarding potential asbestos exposure. Built in 1902 and renovated in 1942, the building likely contained asbestos, which poses health risks if inhaled. Despite the White House’s claims of abatement work, no documentation of inspections or specific work details has been released, and photos reveal construction workers and onlookers potentially exposed to dust. Authorities have yet to specify whether or not required precautions were taken to protect the public.
Read More
As I sit here processing the news that asbestos, a deadly carcinogen, was only now officially banned after decades of partial restrictions, I can’t help but feel a mix of shock and disbelief. How could a substance known to cause serious health issues, like mesothelioma and lung cancer, have been permitted for use for so long? The fact that I, along with many others, have unknowingly been exposed to asbestos dust from brake pads or construction sites is truly alarming. It makes me question the priorities and policies that govern our health and safety.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plays a crucial role in safeguarding public health and the environment, yet the delay in completely banning asbestos raises concerns about the effectiveness and efficiency of regulatory mechanisms.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker