President Trump offered a contradictory account of his response to the shooting of a Minnesota state lawmaker. Initially claiming ignorance of the June incident, he later suggested he would have ordered flags lowered if requested by Governor Walz. However, this statement is contradicted by past remarks and video footage. This evidence shows Trump was dismissive of Governor Walz, stating he wouldn’t speak with him.
Stephen Miller, a key figure in the Trump administration’s immigration policies, faces criticism and mockery, stemming from his time in Congress to his current White House role. A Rolling Stone profile details his influence and alleges he acts as a shadow boss over several agencies. Miller is accused of spearheading controversial initiatives, including the building of detention camps and increased immigration arrests. Furthermore, the article highlights accusations of past animosity towards Latinos and his dismissal of stories of families separated by immigration enforcement.
During a segment on Fox & Friends, host Brian Kilmeade seemingly advocated for the killing of mentally ill homeless individuals, even suggesting “involuntary lethal injection.” This controversial statement came in response to a discussion about the murder of a Ukrainian refugee by a homeless person with schizophrenia. Kilmeade’s comments sparked outrage online, with calls for his resignation and accusations of advocating for mass murder. The remarks also included criticism of elected officials in cities with large homeless populations, further fueling the controversy.
The release of a crude birthday message, allegedly penned by former President Trump for Jeffrey Epstein, has ignited controversy. Despite denials and legal threats from Trump and his allies, the authenticity of the document, a hand-drawn doodle, is being questioned. Some Republican lawmakers are demanding transparency regarding Trump’s relationship with Epstein, posing a challenge to the former president. Trump may resort to diversionary tactics to deflect attention from the issue, potentially involving actions such as deploying national guard troops or expanding deportation efforts.
The House Oversight Committee recently made public a birthday note allegedly sent by Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, sparking controversy. While Democrats presented the note, Republican lawmakers have contested its authenticity, arguing that the signature is not Trump’s. MSNBC political analysts Tim O’Brien and Tim Miller offered commentary on the GOP’s denials and Trump’s ongoing efforts to downplay the situation. The situation highlights the ongoing fallout from the association between Trump and the disgraced financier.
A newly released scrapbook from Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday includes a photo of Epstein holding a novelty check signed by Donald Trump, accompanied by a note suggesting Epstein “sold” Trump a woman. The woman’s face in the photo is redacted, but the caption, allegedly from Joel Pashcow, implies a transaction for $22,500. The woman’s lawyer denied any relationship with either Epstein or Trump, denouncing the note as a hoax. This revelation comes as Democrats on the House oversight committee have begun sharing details from the birthday book, compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell.
A screenshot of a letter allegedly signed by Donald Trump and sent to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003 was released by House Democrats. The letter, which contains a hand-drawn outline of a woman’s torso with Trump’s signature, has been publicly visible for the first time since its existence was reported, prompting Trump to deny its authenticity and sue for defamation. Trump’s legal team and White House officials have contested the letter, with the White House press secretary claiming the image disproves the story. This has led to a controversy surrounding the former friendship between Trump and the deceased sex offender.
Epstein Birthday Letter With Trump’s Signature Revealed, the revelation of the infamous birthday letter, complete with Donald Trump’s signature, has sent shockwaves through the media and, unsurprisingly, stirred up quite a bit of controversy. The whole situation is just…well, it’s a lot. The drawing, in particular, has generated a considerable amount of discussion, and not the good kind.
The most striking aspect, perhaps, is the drawing itself. Some find it utterly bizarre, bordering on disturbing, and frankly, quite juvenile. The details, or lack thereof, in the depiction of the female figure are certainly raising eyebrows. The drawing’s proportions, specifically the underdeveloped breasts, are leading many to believe the image is more suggestive of a pre-pubescent figure than an adult woman.… Continue reading
During a GOP county meeting, Rep. Mike Collins was recorded stating his belief that former President Donald Trump is likely mentioned in the Epstein files. Collins referenced Trump’s actions of removing Epstein from Mar-a-Lago and informing the FBI as a basis for his claim, supporting the release of the files while acknowledging the legal complexities. Reports have indicated that Trump was informed in May about his name appearing in the documents reviewed by Justice Department officials, along with other notable figures, although mentions do not suggest wrongdoing. Despite these findings, officials have stated that additional files will not be released due to sensitive information.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Nancy Mace Criticized for Slur, Blaming Left, and Making Shooting About Herself
Nancy Mace says the Charlie Kirk shooter was “a tr***y” & makes shooting all about herself.
It’s hard to know where to start, but let’s just dive right in. The initial reaction to the shooting of Charlie Kirk was, frankly, predictable. Nancy Mace, in what has become a recurring pattern, seemed more focused on scoring political points and pushing her agenda than on offering genuine concern or seeking the truth. The comments and observations about her actions are, to be blunt, overwhelmingly critical, and with good reason. The claim that the shooter was transgender, a slur in itself, was immediately and unequivocally proven wrong.… Continue reading