DOJ quietly removes study showing right wing attacks ‘outpace’ those by left
The revelation that the Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly removed a study from its website highlighting the disparity between right-wing and left-wing domestic terrorism is, frankly, concerning. The study, conducted by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), reportedly showed a significant imbalance, with right-wing incidents far outpacing those originating from the left. The very act of removing such research raises eyebrows and invites questions about transparency and the potential suppression of inconvenient truths. The fact that the archived version of the study is still accessible via the Wayback Machine, a digital preservation tool, is a testament to the enduring power of the internet and the difficulty of completely erasing information.… Continue reading
The National Institute of Justice’s 2024 study, “What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism,” reveals a significant increase in militant, nationalistic, violent extremism within the United States. The research indicates far-right attacks consistently surpass all other forms of terrorism and domestic violent extremism. Specifically, since 1990, far-right extremists have committed substantially more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist groups. This study likely faced removal due to its findings, as they conflict with the political narrative attempting to shift blame for political violence.
Read More
Following the assassination of right-wing political commentator Charlie Kirk, the U.S. Department of Justice removed a study from its website concerning the frequency of “far-right attacks.” The study, which remains accessible through the Wayback Machine, concluded that far-right extremists have committed significantly more ideologically motivated homicides than those on the left. The study’s removal occurred after Kirk’s death on September 10, 2025, during a speaking event. Former President Donald Trump later commented on the situation, stating that the radicals on the left are the problem, and they are vicious and horrible.
Read More
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has removed a study detailing that white supremacist and far-right violence remains the most prevalent form of terrorism and domestic violent extremism in the United States. The study, conducted by the National Institute of Justice, was hosted on a DOJ website until at least September 12, 2025, according to archived records. A message now appears on the webpage where the study was hosted, indicating a review of websites and materials is underway, citing recent Executive Orders and related guidance. During this review, some content may be unavailable.
Read More
Following the closure of the popular climate.gov website due to funding cuts by the Trump administration, experts have launched an independent successor, climate.us, to ensure public access to critical climate information. The Trump administration’s actions involved the termination of climate.gov staff and the removal of climate data, including information related to diversity and equity. The new platform aims to restore censored content and continuously update climate data, countering the administration’s efforts to suppress climate science. This initiative underscores the importance of accessible and trusted climate information, especially given the implications for extreme weather preparedness and the ongoing climate crisis.
Read More
Following the death of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, a call to reinstate the Cold War-era Smith-Mundt Act, rebranded as the “Charlie Kirk Act,” has gained traction online, promoted by a TikTok user. The proposal, endorsed by Donald Trump, seeks to hold media outlets accountable for alleged propaganda and misinformation. This would include fines for those who label individuals without proof and penalties for social media censorship. While the original act aimed to prevent the domestic spread of U.S.-backed foreign media, the petition’s call for its revival has gained significant support, amassing thousands of signatures in a short period.
Read More
Newly leaked documents reveal that the Chinese company Geedge Networks is selling sophisticated censorship systems, modeled after the Great Firewall, to governments globally. These systems allow for online information monitoring, website and VPN blocking, and individual surveillance. Deployed in countries like Kazakhstan, Ethiopia, and Pakistan, the company’s core offering, the Tiangou Secure Gateway, can process an entire country’s internet traffic, intercepting sensitive data and employing machine learning to identify and block circumvention tools. Researchers warn that the system gives governments unprecedented power, including the ability to target individuals based on their online activities.
Read More
Following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Republicans are demanding repercussions for individuals who reacted negatively to his death, including lifetime bans on social media and revocation of business licenses. Lawmakers, such as Louisiana Representative Clay Higgins, are leveraging their influence to punish those who “belittled” or “celebrated” the killing, while the Deputy Secretary of State has warned foreigners glorifying violence they may be expelled. These reactions include demands for termination of a Secret Service agent who wrote a Facebook post, as well as the firing of an MSNBC analyst and staff members at various universities for disparaging remarks. Furthermore, these actions have sparked condemnation of Elon Musk’s response to the assassination.
Read More
While the USTA anticipates celebrating a successful US Open with record attendance and social media engagement, the tournament’s defining moment may be its decision to prevent broadcasters from showing dissent against Donald Trump. Internal emails reveal the USTA instructed its partners to avoid showcasing negative reactions towards the former president, a move that contradicts the tournament’s history of televising fan disruptions. This action, seen as a capitulation to fear, undermines the Open’s character as a democratic and unfiltered event. The USTA’s attempt to shield Trump from public disapproval not only clashes with the spirit of the sport but also sacrifices the tournament’s credibility.
Read More
Organizers of the US Open have instructed broadcasters to avoid showing any negative crowd reactions to Donald Trump’s expected attendance at the men’s final. The former president, a frequent visitor before his presidency, is scheduled to be shown on screen during the national anthem. This directive was communicated in an email to broadcasters, aiming to prevent any disruptions or reactions related to Trump’s presence. Despite the potential for overshadowed, Alcaraz views the attendance as beneficial for tennis.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker