The Washington Post declined to run a Common Cause advertisement calling for President Trump to fire Elon Musk from his advisory role. The ad, which also criticized Musk’s influence on government, was intended to appear as a wraparound on the front and back pages and was to be distributed to Congress, the Pentagon, and the White House. Common Cause suggests the Post’s decision may be linked to the relationship between Post owner Jeff Bezos and President Trump. The Post stated that it has the right to require factual substantiation in advertisements and to obtain necessary permissions for use of individuals’ names and likenesses.
Read More
X, formerly Twitter, is blocking links to Signal.me, a URL shortener used by the encrypted messaging app Signal, preventing users from sharing contact links via direct messages, posts, and profiles. This action coincides with DOGE’s efforts to reduce federal spending, leading to widespread federal employee firings and increased use of Signal for secure communication. X’s actions are generating concern, particularly given Musk’s history of silencing dissent on the platform. The blocks appear to be automated, triggering error messages for users attempting to share Signal.me links. TechCrunch’s attempts to replicate the issue were successful.
Read More
The Washington Post declined to publish a $115,000 Common Cause advertisement demanding President Trump fire Elon Musk from his advisory role. The ad, featuring an image of a laughing Musk and questioning his influence, was intended to run in the Post and be distributed to Congress and government officials. The Post’s rejection, coming after it showcased a pro-Trump ad as a sample, raises concerns about censorship and potential conflicts of interest given owner Jeff Bezos’s business interests. Common Cause President Kase Solomón questioned whether the Post’s decision stemmed from the ad’s criticism of Musk and potential repercussions from President Trump.
Read More
A Moscow court levied a 3.8 million ruble ($41,530) fine against Google for YouTube content providing instructions on surrendering to Ukrainian forces. This penalty follows Russia’s ongoing practice of fining foreign tech platforms for allegedly illegal content related to the Ukraine conflict. The fine comes amidst accusations by critics that Russia is intentionally throttling YouTube speeds to suppress dissenting viewpoints. Google has yet to publicly respond to the ruling and denies Russia’s claims of equipment failures causing the speed issues.
Read More
The Trump White House indefinitely banned the Associated Press from the Oval Office and Air Force One due to the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” despite the President’s renaming of the body of water to “Gulf of America.” This decision, condemned by the White House Correspondents Association as a First Amendment violation, prevents the AP from participating in pooled press events crucial for White House coverage. While the AP retains White House grounds credentials, the ban significantly impacts its ability to report on presidential activities. The AP is preparing a legal challenge, citing viewpoint discrimination.
Read More
Following criticism over its renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to “Gulf of America” for US users, Google Maps has temporarily disabled user reviews for the location. This action, defended by Google as a measure to prevent irrelevant or abusive content, comes amidst accusations of censorship due to the removal of negative reviews. The company cites a previous blog post detailing its policies on combating fake reviews and managing user-generated content. This incident highlights the increasing use of “review-bombing” as a form of online protest.
Read More
The White House barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from presidential events after the AP refused to use President Trump’s newly decreed name, “Gulf of America,” for the Gulf of Mexico. The White House deemed the AP’s continued use of “Gulf of Mexico” as a lie and retaliated by restricting access, a move condemned by press freedom advocates as a violation of the First Amendment. While the White House claims Oval Office access is a privilege, critics argue this action constitutes censorship and intimidation. Several major news organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, similarly rejected the name change, citing the body of water’s international boundaries and long-established name.
Read More
Pakistan’s interior ministry finally admitted to temporarily blocking access to X (formerly Twitter) in February, citing national security concerns and the platform’s alleged failure to comply with government directives regarding misuse. The ban, implemented around the time of general elections, followed claims of vote rigging and subsequent protests. The government asserted that X was being used to spread destabilizing content, a claim disputed by activists who viewed the block as an attempt to suppress dissent. A court subsequently ordered the platform’s restoration within a week.
Read More
A federal judge temporarily blocked the removal of several government websites containing crucial health information, citing potential harm to public health. The websites, which provided data on HIV treatment, environmental health, and other vital areas, were taken down following an executive order targeting “gender ideology.” This action, argued by Doctors for America, violated federal law by failing to provide adequate notice and jeopardizing patient care. The judge’s order mandates the immediate restoration of the websites pending further legal review.
Read More
Google has removed references to Black History Month, Women’s History Month, LGBTQ+ holidays, and other cultural events from its calendars, citing the unsustainable nature of manually maintaining hundreds of global events. This decision follows Google’s rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and its adoption of names for geographical locations mandated by executive orders. Users must now manually add these events to their calendars. While Google maintains it continues to celebrate cultural moments elsewhere, the calendar change has sparked user criticism.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker