Vice President JD Vance will spearhead a Smithsonian Institution overhaul, as directed by President Trump’s executive order aiming to restore “truth and sanity” to American history. The order targets exhibits and programs deemed divisive, specifically citing the planned American Women’s History Museum and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Funding for these institutions will be contingent upon compliance with the order’s directives. Simultaneously, renovations to Independence Hall are mandated in preparation for its 250th anniversary. This action reflects Trump’s broader campaign against what he labels “woke” ideology within American culture.
Read More
President Trump signed an executive order, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” aiming to counter what it terms a biased rewriting of American history. The order specifically targets the Smithsonian Institution, prohibiting funding for exhibits deemed divisive or inconsistent with federal policy, and mandates a review of monuments altered since 2020. Further, the order seeks to prevent the disparagement of Americans in historical displays. This action follows Trump’s recent takeover of the Kennedy Center, resulting in numerous high-profile cancellations.
Read More
Papua New Guinea’s government temporarily shut down Facebook, citing concerns about hate speech, misinformation, and other harmful content. This action, undertaken under the country’s anti-terrorism laws, has been met with strong opposition from MPs and media leaders who label it an abuse of human rights and a move towards authoritarianism. While the government claims the ban is a test to promote responsible social media use, the lack of prior warning and the platform’s crucial role in public discourse have fueled widespread criticism. The ban affects approximately 1.3 million Facebook users in the country.
Read More
This week, Russia implements a law prohibiting individuals designated as “foreign agents” from conducting any educational activities in the Russian language, punishable by fines or imprisonment. The designation, initially applied to organizations with significant foreign funding involved in vaguely defined political activities, has broadened to encompass critics and now severely restricts their ability to use the Russian language for teaching or public discourse. This expansion criminalizes various forms of expression, including writing, lecturing, and even social media posts, impacting exiled individuals financially and effectively treating the Russian language as state property. The law further restricts “foreign agents” from financial transactions, hindering their ability to support themselves abroad.
Read More
Russia’s recent arrest of a priest for a decade-old photograph showing him with a Ukrainian flag highlights the increasingly repressive atmosphere within the country. The image, taken years before the current conflict escalated, now serves as evidence of supposed disloyalty in the eyes of the authorities. This seemingly arbitrary arrest underscores the chilling effect on free speech and expression within Russia’s borders.
The priest’s actions in the photograph, seemingly innocuous years ago, are now deemed criminal. This points towards a retrospective application of laws and a broadening interpretation of what constitutes dissent or disloyalty to the state. The sheer age of the photograph further emphasizes the lengths to which the Russian government is willing to go to suppress even the faintest signs of pro-Ukrainian sentiment.… Continue reading
Following the detention of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu and the revocation of his university degree, X, at the Turkish government’s request, blocked access to student group accounts from prominent Turkish universities. These universities included Galatasaray, Middle East Technical, and Boğaziçi, and the blockages followed widespread student protests condemning the actions as politically motivated. The actions are part of a broader pattern of X complying with Turkish requests to censor dissenting voices, raising concerns about censorship under Elon Musk’s ownership. Student groups continue to protest, vowing to resist government pressure.
Read More
A French scientist was denied entry into the U.S. after immigration officers discovered messages critical of the Trump administration on his phone. The scientist, employed by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), was reportedly accused of “hateful and conspiratorial messages” and a potential FBI investigation, though charges were later dropped. The incident prompted France’s Minister of Higher Education and Research to publicly defend academic freedom and criticize recent cuts to scientific research in the U.S. US Customs and Border Protection stated that all arriving persons are subject to inspection and that such searches are standard procedure.
Read More
A French researcher, employed by the CNRS, was denied entry to the United States and subsequently deported. American authorities cited messages on his phone expressing opinions critical of the Trump administration’s research policies as the reason for denial, classifying the opinions as “hateful” and even “terrorism.” The French government, while acknowledging US sovereignty over entry, deplores the incident, emphasizing the importance of freedom of opinion and academic freedom. Following an FBI investigation, charges were dropped.
Read More
Five Republican Minnesota senators will introduce a bill classifying “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS) as a mental illness, defining it as “acute onset of paranoia” regarding Donald Trump’s presidencies. The bill, set for review by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee on Monday, proposes amending state statutes to include TDS as a diagnosable condition. Critics argue TDS is a politically motivated label lacking clinical basis and could be used to suppress dissent, while proponents claim it manifests as hostility and aggression towards Trump and his supporters. The bill’s passage is uncertain given the DFL’s narrow Senate majority.
Read More
A bill recently introduced in the Minnesota legislature proposes that expressing intense verbal hostility toward President Donald J. Trump constitutes “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” a serious mental illness requiring immediate intervention. This is a truly astonishing proposition, suggesting a chilling precedent for suppressing dissent and freedom of expression.
The very idea that strong negative opinions about a political figure should be classified as a mental disorder is deeply concerning. It smacks of authoritarian regimes that historically used psychiatric diagnoses to silence critics and political opponents. The proposed bill’s authors seemingly fail to grasp the fundamental principles of free speech and the right to express one’s political views, however vehemently.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood