National parks, places meant to preserve and illuminate our nation’s history, are now facing a directive to essentially police their own narratives. This isn’t about accurate historical representation; it’s about a concerted effort to sanitize the past, to eliminate any aspect that might cause discomfort, particularly for a certain segment of the population. The idea that history should be comfortable is fundamentally misguided. History, by its very nature, is complex, messy, and often uncomfortable. It’s filled with both triumphs and tragedies, moments of pride and periods of profound shame. Ignoring or downplaying the less palatable parts doesn’t erase them; it merely prevents us from learning from them.… Continue reading
President Trump signed the Take It Down Act, criminalizing the nonconsensual online distribution of authentic and AI-generated intimate images and videos. The legislation mandates website removal of such content within 48 hours of victim requests and imposes penalties on violators, including restitution and imprisonment. Bipartisan support led to the bill’s unanimous Senate passage and overwhelming House approval. The Act addresses the growing problem of deepfakes and online harassment, particularly impacting women and young people. First Lady Melania Trump championed the legislation, emphasizing its importance in protecting individuals from online abuse.
Read More
Kanye West’s song “Heil Hitler,” glorifying Hitler, has been widely circulated on X, despite removal from other platforms. Joe Rogan, while condemning West’s views, argued against censorship, suggesting the song’s popularity on X validates West’s claims of a concerted effort to silence him. Rogan’s perspective was that allowing free speech, even offensive content, has benefits, but also risks normalizing hateful rhetoric. He expressed concern about the song’s potential to embolden others and questioned the song’s ultimate consequences. This discussion follows previous criticisms of Rogan for platforming individuals who promote antisemitic and other extremist views.
Read More
NYU withheld Logan Rozos’s diploma after he delivered an anti-war commencement speech condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza, characterizing them as genocide supported by the U.S. The university stated Rozos violated his agreement by delivering a speech differing from his promised content and used his platform to express personal political views. This action follows previous incidents where NYU has faced criticism for suppressing anti-war speech and allegedly yielding to pressure from pro-Israel groups. Rozos’s student profile was subsequently removed from the NYU website.
Read More
Senator Mike Lee’s Interstate Obscenity Definition Act seeks to significantly broaden the legal definition of obscenity, effectively criminalizing pornography by expanding the criteria to include material appealing to prurient interests in sex or nudity lacking serious artistic or literary value. This mirrors the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which advocated for similar measures. Critics argue the bill’s vague language could impact a wide range of content and excessively empowers the federal government to regulate speech, potentially violating First Amendment rights. The bill, previously introduced in 2022, has faced significant opposition from free speech advocates and industry groups.
Read More
The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act, introduced by Senator Mike Lee and Representative Mary Miller, aims to create a consistent nationwide definition of obscenity to combat the spread of explicit content online. The bill updates the outdated legal definition of obscenity, clarifying standards for prosecuting the transmission of such material across state lines. This modernized definition removes ambiguities in current law, offering law enforcement clearer tools to identify and remove obscene content. By establishing consistent criteria, the act seeks to prevent criminals from exploiting differing state definitions to evade prosecution.
Read More
A Beachwood, Ohio man checked out 100 books from the Cuyahoga County Public Library, focusing on Jewish, African-American, and LGBTQ+ history. He subsequently posted social media videos showing these books, which were valued at approximately $1700, first in a car trunk with a caption referencing “cleansing” libraries, and later being burned. The Princeton University Bridging Divides Initiative alerted the library to the videos. The library will pursue restitution for the destroyed books once they are officially overdue, while police involvement remains limited to a potential civil matter.
Read More
Facing potential penalties, including fines and imprisonment, X, under Indian government mandate, has blocked over 8,000 accounts. A significant portion of these blocking orders lacked evidence or justification, prompting X to express disagreement while simultaneously complying to maintain Indian accessibility. X is exploring legal options to challenge these directives, emphasizing the importance of transparency despite current legal limitations preventing public release of the orders. The blocked accounts include those of prominent users and international news organizations.
Read More
Following a Turkish court order, X has blocked access to İstanbul’s suspended mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu’s Turkish-language account, citing a legal demand. This action, unprecedented for a high-profile elected official, comes amidst widespread protests following İmamoğlu’s arrest on corruption charges—charges the CHP alleges are politically motivated. The blocking follows a pattern of similar restrictions on activists and journalists’ accounts, although X previously stated its intent to challenge such orders legally. İmamoğlu’s English account remains accessible, and he continues to communicate via his lawyers.
Read More
Several immigrants who fled authoritarian regimes expressed alarm at tactics employed during the Trump administration, finding parallels to their home countries’ oppressive practices. These included aggressive questioning and phone searches at borders, reminiscent of the surveillance and intimidation they experienced abroad. Conversely, some immigrants, such as Lily Tang Williams, felt the Biden administration’s actions, particularly regarding censorship, were more reminiscent of authoritarian tactics. Concerns extended to academia, with professors fearing self-censorship due to potential repercussions from the administration’s actions. The targeting of news organizations further mirrored tactics used by authoritarian leaders in other nations.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker