The chair of the US’s top media regulator has claimed journalists were misled into covering claims by Stephen Colbert that his network blocked him from interviewing a Texas Senate candidate. The network stated it merely provided legal guidance regarding equal time regulations, not censorship. The FCC chairman maintains the commission is simply enforcing existing rules, while a dissenting commissioner suggests the FCC is being weaponized to pressure broadcasters. Meanwhile, Colbert aired the interview on YouTube, significantly boosting the candidate’s campaign, and the FCC has opened an enforcement action into another program over the candidate’s appearance.
Read More
The Federal Communications Commission, through its chair, has firmly stated that no censorship occurred regarding Stephen Colbert’s interview with Texas State Representative James Talarico. However, this denial is accompanied by a crucial detail: the FCC informed broadcasters that such interviews *could* be subject to censorship in the future. This preemptive notification, rather than an outright ban, is being interpreted by many as a strategic move designed to elicit self-censorship from networks. Colbert himself, in his announcement, made it clear that CBS proactively opted not to air the interview, allegedly due to the potential repercussions signaled by the FCC. The narrative presented is that CBS, fearing future FCC action or legal entanglement, chose to comply in advance, effectively censoring the segment themselves.… Continue reading
This interview, posted by Talarico on X with the caption, “This is the interview Donald Trump didn’t want you to see,” has garnered significant online attention, accumulating millions of views across various platforms. Stephen Colbert defied network directives by airing clips and urging viewers to watch the full interview online, where it has since achieved substantial viewership. Colbert also publicly criticized the FCC’s equal-time rule for political candidates, a directive he then leveraged by releasing the Talarico interview on digital platforms, a move that has amplified its reach and generated considerable publicity for both Talarico and Colbert.
Read More
During a live broadcast commemorating the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, a reporter seemingly uttered “death to Khamenei” instead of the typical pro-regime chants. This incident led to the dismissal of the provincial broadcast station’s director and disciplinary reviews for other staff. Separately, a mosque sermon also appeared to be interrupted before the phrase “death to Khamenei” could be fully spoken. These events occurred as Iran marked the 47th anniversary of its revolution, with Supreme Leader Khamenei and President Pezeshkian offering contrasting messages regarding the nation’s direction and the recent crackdown on protests.
Read More
North Koreans are facing severe punishments, including public executions and labor camp sentences, for consuming South Korean media such as popular dramas like “Squid Game” and music by artists like BTS. These harsh penalties, particularly for teenagers and those without financial means, highlight the North Korean government’s extreme crackdown on foreign information. Wealthier families can sometimes avoid the most brutal consequences through bribery, revealing a system where repression is intertwined with corruption, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable.
Read More
During an antitrust hearing concerning Netflix’s potential acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery assets, Sen. Josh Hawley expressed strong opposition to the streaming platform’s inclusion of transgender representation, particularly in children’s programming. Hawley inaccurately claimed that a significant portion of Netflix’s content for young viewers promotes a “transgender ideology agenda,” a statistic Netflix’s co-CEO, Ted Sarandos, refuted, stating it was inaccurate. Sarandos emphasized Netflix’s commitment to offering diverse content to a broad audience and highlighted parental control tools available on the platform, while Hawley persisted in expressing his personal disapproval of content he perceives as undermining parental values.
Read More
Following the announcement of a new joint venture to manage TikTok’s U.S. operations, user uninstalls have surged. Sensor Tower reported a nearly 150% increase in average daily app deletions over the last five days. The joint venture introduced a new privacy policy that prompted some users to express concerns on social media. Despite the updated policy containing similar language as an archived version from August 2024, the announcement has resulted in a demonstrable change in user sentiment, leading to more deletions.
Read More
Oracle says data center outage causing issues faced by US TikTok users, and it’s certainly stirred up a lot of chatter. You know, when a major platform like TikTok experiences problems, and the explanation involves a data center outage, it naturally raises eyebrows. The core issue seems to be that users in the US are experiencing difficulties, and the initial explanation points to this specific technical problem.
Data center issues cause censorship? Interesting. Many people are questioning if a simple technical glitch is truly behind the problems, with some suggesting a different, more politically motivated explanation. The timing is also a point of contention, with the “outage” coinciding with sensitive events or specific types of content, like discussions about specific political figures or topics.… Continue reading
Comedian Megan Stalter and other TikTok users reported difficulties uploading videos critical of ICE, leading to accusations of censorship. These issues arose around the same time a new joint venture, partly owned by Oracle with ties to the Trump administration, took control of TikTok’s US operations. While TikTok attributed the glitches to a power outage, the timing of the issues raised concerns about content moderation and data security among users. Experts like Casey Fiesler highlight the lack of trust in social media platforms and the potential for perceived censorship, especially given the platform’s changing ownership.
Read More
TikTok users in the US have reported issues with the platform, specifically being unable to use the word “Epstein” in messages, alongside claims of censorship regarding content about ICE raids and protests. These issues arose shortly after TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, was forced to divest a majority stake to US investors. California Governor Gavin Newsom is launching a review into whether TikTok is violating state law by censoring Trump-critical content, while the platform attributes the problems to a “major infrastructure” issue caused by a power outage. The Independent has reached out to TikTok for further clarification on the issues and how the ownership change will impact content moderation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
TikTok Users Report Anti-ICE Video Censorship, Company Cites “Tech Issues”
Comedian Megan Stalter and other TikTok users reported difficulties uploading videos critical of ICE, leading to accusations of censorship. These issues arose around the same time a new joint venture, partly owned by Oracle with ties to the Trump administration, took control of TikTok’s US operations. While TikTok attributed the glitches to a power outage, the timing of the issues raised concerns about content moderation and data security among users. Experts like Casey Fiesler highlight the lack of trust in social media platforms and the potential for perceived censorship, especially given the platform’s changing ownership.
Read More