Senator Rand Paul alleges the White House disinvited his family from a bipartisan picnic, citing “petty vindictiveness” and “immaturity.” This action follows Paul’s outspoken criticism of the President’s policy bill, particularly its expansion of the national debt. Paul believes this disinvitation, impacting even his infant grandson, is a politically ineffective attempt to silence his opposition. He further suggests the action may have originated from White House staffers, possibly including Stephen Miller, and demonstrates a concerning decline in political discourse.
Read More
A new Quinnipiac University poll reveals President Trump’s approval rating at a low 38%, with 54% disapproving. Negative net approval ratings plague his handling of key issues, including immigration (-9%), the economy (-16%), and trade (-19%). Support for his “big beautiful bill” is also weak, with 53% of voters opposing it. Furthermore, his approach to the Russia-Ukraine war garnered only 34% approval.
Read More
The planned military parade celebrating a former president’s birthday has sparked a significant rift within the Republican party. One GOP senator, notably, voiced strong disapproval, drawing parallels between the spectacle and the military displays of North Korea. This comparison immediately highlights a critical point of contention: the perception that such a parade, particularly on a personal celebratory occasion, is inconsistent with American values and traditions.
This senator’s critique wasn’t merely about the expense – although the cost of such an undertaking is undoubtedly significant, drawing concern at a time when many Americans grapple with economic hardship. The core issue seems to be the optics of the event itself.… Continue reading
Senator Rand Paul, the first Republican senator to publicly oppose President Trump’s planned military parade, criticized the estimated $45 million cost and compared the event’s imagery to authoritarian regimes like North Korea. Fellow Republican senators, including John Kennedy, Roger Wicker, and Susan Collins, also expressed concerns about the parade’s expense, though less vehemently than Paul. The parade, celebrating the Army’s 250th birthday, will feature thousands of troops and various military equipment, potentially necessitating costly street repairs afterwards. Despite these criticisms, President Trump defended the parade’s cost as minimal compared to its value.
Read More
Following the Secretary of Defense’s threat to deploy active-duty Marines to quell protests in Los Angeles against immigration policies, several prominent Republicans voiced support. House Speaker Mike Johnson justified the potential use of Marines as a necessary measure to maintain order, citing Governor Newsom’s perceived inaction. This deployment would mark the first use of active-duty troops to suppress domestic unrest since 1992, raising concerns about potential legal violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, despite the administration’s reliance on Title 10 of the U.S. Code. Republican Senators Lankford and Mullin criticized protesters, despite actions like displaying Mexican flags being protected speech.
Read More
Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, has publicly declared his refusal to follow his party “off the cliff,” marking a significant divergence from the prevailing trend within the GOP. His dissent is noteworthy, highlighting a dwindling number of Republicans willing to publicly challenge the party line. This open break suggests a potential departure from the Republican party altogether.
This statement, however, is met with considerable skepticism from various quarters. Many point to his past voting record, arguing that his actions haven’t consistently aligned with his recent pronouncements. Numerous instances are cited where Bacon seemingly voted in lockstep with the Trump agenda, undermining his claims of principled opposition.… Continue reading
The current state of the U.S. government under President Trump, marked by economic downturn, a dysfunctional Congress, and a public feud with Elon Musk, raises serious questions about Republican priorities. The administration’s actions, including damaging tariffs and reckless spending, appear to directly contradict the party’s purported commitment to the working class. This chaotic political climate, fueled by partisan loyalty, seems to prioritize power over effective governance and economic stability. Republican voters’ apparent acceptance of this situation suggests a willingness to sacrifice national well-being for ideological reasons.
Read More
Republicans are deeply concerned that the fallout from the recent DOGE cuts will significantly damage their chances in the upcoming Virginia governor’s race. The party’s flippant and dismissive response to the widespread job losses has only exacerbated the situation. Their attempt to deflect criticism with a website filled with broken links to job search sites has further alienated voters.
The lack of a meaningful response from Republican leaders, including the Virginia Attorney General and Governor, during the mass layoffs impacting Northern Virginia and the Norfolk region, has fueled public anger. The party’s failure to join other states in pushing back against these cuts is a major point of contention for voters.… Continue reading
Musk’s call for Trump’s impeachment has undeniably ignited a firestorm, sparking a flurry of reactions ranging from fervent support to utter disbelief. The timing of this declaration, following Musk’s previous endorsements of Trump, is particularly striking and leaves many wondering about the underlying motivations. The shift in Musk’s stance raises questions about the nature of his relationship with Trump and the potential influence of political maneuvering.
The sheer audacity of the statement is captivating. It’s not every day a prominent figure like Musk publicly advocates for the impeachment of a former president, particularly one he previously championed. The potential ramifications for the Republican party and the broader political landscape are significant, suggesting a potential realignment of power dynamics.… Continue reading
The article contends that true conservative politicians, defined by upholding traditional values, limited government, and fiscal responsibility, have seemingly vanished from the political landscape. This disappearance is evidenced by the current administration’s disregard for checks and balances, the Republican party’s embrace of increased spending, and a lack of condemnation for actions contradicting core conservative principles. The author argues that while individuals may claim the conservative label, their actions often belie this claim. The current political climate, fueled by grievance and fear-mongering, has allowed this shift to occur, jeopardizing the future of the Republic.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood