Top U.S. Negotiator Warned Europeans That Russia Is Stockpiling Missiles, which brings us to a rather unsettling situation, doesn’t it? The core argument seems to be that Russia is accumulating a large arsenal of missiles, therefore, Ukraine should hasten to accept a less-than-ideal deal. It feels a bit like being told, “The mugger got a bigger knife, so hand over your valuables now.” The logic here appears, to put it mildly, twisted.
Now, consider the implications if this is indeed the strategic thinking from certain corners. It’s almost as if Putin doesn’t need to actually fire his missiles; he’s already getting everything he wants, served on a silver platter.… Continue reading
A group of European lawmakers has sent a letter to U.S. President Donald Trump, expressing concerns about potential appeasement of Russia. The letter, signed by parliamentarians from various European countries, follows criticism of a leaked peace plan perceived as favoring Russian interests in Ukraine. The signatories condemn any pressure on Ukraine and urge strong American leadership, warning that a perceived Russian victory would embolden authoritarian regimes. The letter specifically invokes Ronald Reagan’s policy towards the USSR and cautions against actions that could undermine the U.S.-led order, with the world closely watching the situation in Ukraine.
Read More
US proposals to end Russia’s war involve Ukraine giving up land, some weapons, sources say, and frankly, the whole thing sounds like a rerun of a bad movie. It’s hard to believe, but it seems like some within the US administration are seriously considering a plan where Ukraine would essentially concede territory and reduce its military capabilities in exchange for…well, what exactly? Peace? That’s the million-dollar question, isn’t it?
The central concept here is that these proposals involve Ukraine making significant concessions, the most alarming being the potential ceding of land. This, of course, comes with a host of uncomfortable implications.… Continue reading
Following his US trip, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy urged allies not to appease Russia, despite failing to secure long-range Tomahawk missiles. He called for decisive action from European and American partners amidst escalated Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure, leaving many without essential services. While Trump expressed optimism about a deal after a call with Putin, Moscow continued its offensive, intensifying strikes and claiming to have captured villages. Meanwhile, a drone strike on a Gazprom plant in Russia disrupted supplies from a Kazakh oil and gas field.
Read More
EU’s Kallas: “Territorial concessions to Russia would bring more war, not less.” That statement really cuts to the heart of a massive, complex issue. It’s a position that’s easy to understand, and for good reason: history has shown us, time and again, that giving in to aggression rarely brings lasting peace. Quite the opposite, in fact. Concessions can be perceived as a sign of weakness, and that can embolden an aggressor to push further, leading to more conflict, not less. It’s a chillingly familiar pattern.
Think about the lessons of the past, specifically the lead-up to the Second World War. The appeasement policies adopted by some nations, hoping to placate the expansionist desires of others, ultimately failed.… Continue reading
Ukraine’s future cannot be decided without Ukrainians, France’s Macron says, and that sentiment is crucial. It’s a simple statement, really, but it carries a weight that speaks to the very core of self-determination and sovereignty. We often hear this phrase, and it’s easy to nod along, but what does it *truly* mean in the context of the current situation? It means that any decisions about Ukraine’s fate, its borders, its governance, its very existence as a nation, should be made with the active participation and consent of the Ukrainian people. It’s about respecting their agency and their right to shape their own destiny, not allowing powerful nations to redraw maps or make deals over their heads.… Continue reading
During the Biden administration, a debate arose regarding the prosecution of Donald Trump, with some advocating for accountability and others prioritizing due process. This latter group, including figures in the legal and academic fields, largely influenced the administration’s approach. Consequently, law enforcement displayed reluctance in pursuing charges and trials were delayed, allowing Trump to potentially benefit politically from the delays. The article argues that this leniency has emboldened Trump, enabling his actions, and suggesting a slide towards authoritarianism. The author asserts that the hesitancy to hold Trump accountable, which is viewed as a lack of spine and cowardly, may pave the way for future demagogues.
Read More
In an exclusive BBC interview, Joe Biden condemned the Trump administration’s pressure on Ukraine to cede territory to Russia as “modern-day appeasement,” arguing that such concessions would not satisfy Vladimir Putin. Biden expressed concern that this approach could damage US-European relations and erode trust in American leadership. He further criticized Trump’s rhetoric and actions towards allies, contrasting them with his own administration’s policies. Biden highlighted the importance of strong alliances and the economic benefits of collaboration, contrasting Trump’s approach with his own record of economic growth and international influence.
Read More
Former President Biden criticized Donald Trump’s proposed concessions to Russia in Ukraine as “modern-day appeasement,” fearing it would embolden Russia and other European nations. Biden contrasted this with his own administration’s approach, which he argued provided Ukraine with the necessary support to resist invasion while carefully avoiding a broader conflict, including the risk of nuclear escalation. He maintained that Putin views Ukraine as historically Russian territory and that concessions would only encourage further aggression. Biden asserted his administration successfully prevented World War III through calculated responses to Putin’s threats.
Read More
Following a meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky at the Vatican, former US President Trump stated his belief that Zelensky is willing to cede Crimea to Russia as part of a peace deal. Trump urged both Putin and Zelensky to negotiate a ceasefire, suggesting a deal could be reached within two weeks. This assertion contradicts Ukraine’s repeated refusal to negotiate territorial concessions before a ceasefire is established, and has drawn criticism from German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, who deemed it akin to capitulation. Proposed US peace plans reportedly include Russian annexation of Crimea and other occupied territories, while counter-proposals insist on discussing territorial issues only after a ceasefire.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker