Keith Kellogg’s suggestion that Ukraine could be divided like post-World War II Berlin is a deeply problematic proposal, sparking outrage and disbelief across the board. The immediate reaction from many is one of profound shock and anger. Dividing a nation currently under brutal invasion is seen as an act of appalling disregard for Ukrainian sovereignty and the suffering inflicted upon its people.
The comparison to Berlin is particularly flawed. Germany was divided after a war it instigated and lost, resulting in its defeat and occupation. Ukraine, on the other hand, is the victim of unprovoked aggression, defending its territory against a full-scale invasion.… Continue reading
Senator Schumer’s capitulation to Trump’s budget demands, mirroring actions by various leaders across sectors, highlights the failure of appeasement. Columbia University’s response to Trump administration actions against its students, including expulsions and a lack of condemnation, exemplifies this failed strategy. Experts argue that such concessions embolden authoritarian agendas, resulting in escalating harm, rather than preventing it. Resistance, as shown through successful legal challenges to Trump’s policies, offers a more effective means of limiting his power.
Read More
Following a deadly Russian attack on Ukrainian cities, resulting in numerous civilian casualties, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk implicitly criticized the United States’ recent actions. Tusk’s statement linked the increased aggression to appeasement of Russia, highlighting the resulting escalation in violence and loss of life. This follows reports of a US halt to military aid and intelligence sharing, actions allegedly contributing to Russian battlefield gains and Ukrainian deaths. The attacks on Dobropillia and Kharkiv Oblast underscore the severity of the ongoing conflict.
Read More
Two agreements were signed in Kiev on March 6th, 2025, granting Ukrainian peas and wild aquatic products access to the Chinese market. Chinese Ambassador Ma Shengkun and Ukrainian official Serhii Tkachuk finalized the deals, furthering agricultural cooperation between the two nations. Ambassador Ma highlighted the significant complementary potential of China-Ukraine agricultural collaboration. The agreements are expected to substantially boost bilateral trade and strengthen the strategic partnership between China and Ukraine.
Read More
Amidst a U.S. pause on military aid to Ukraine following a contentious Oval Office meeting between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy, Prime Minister Trudeau reaffirmed Canada’s unwavering support for Ukraine. Trudeau criticized the U.S.’s perceived shift towards appeasement of Russia, contrasting it with Canada’s steadfast commitment to upholding the rules-based international order. Zelenskyy, acknowledging a problematic meeting with Trump, expressed a desire for constructive future cooperation and reiterated Ukraine’s commitment to peace. Despite the U.S. aid suspension, Ukraine asserted its capacity to maintain its defense.
Read More
Donald Trump’s bullying of Ukrainian President Zelensky in a recent press conference, along with prior instances of appeasement by other world leaders, highlights a dangerous slide towards authoritarianism in the US. This behavior, enabled by the Republican Party and others, demonstrates a disregard for democratic values and international alliances, leaving the UK and other nations vulnerable to exploitation. The urgent need for increased defense spending and a unified front against Trump’s isolationist tactics is paramount to prevent further erosion of Western civilization. Only through collective action can the free world hope to counter this threat and safeguard its future.
Read More
Trump’s recent pronouncements regarding his communications with Vladimir Putin and his escalating criticism of Volodymyr Zelenskyy paint a disturbing picture. He boasts of “good talks” with Putin, while simultaneously ignoring Ukraine’s pleas for support and launching personal attacks against its democratically elected leader. This stark contrast highlights a troubling prioritization of personal gain over national interests and international stability.
This situation evokes chilling parallels to historical moments where appeasement of dictators led to catastrophic consequences. The image conjured is one of a leader seemingly more concerned with personal accolades and potential benefits from a hostile power than with upholding democratic values and protecting an ally under siege.… Continue reading
This year’s Munich Security Conference risks repeating the disastrous 1938 conference’s failures. A parallel is drawn between the current geopolitical climate and the appeasement of Hitler, suggesting a similar blindness to current threats. Concerns are raised that a policy of appeasement is resurfacing in Munich. The conference’s atmosphere is characterized as one where a dangerous lack of decisive action is looming.
Read More
On January 5th, 2025, over 160 prominent Ukrainian figures released an open appeal, “Do Not Appease Evil,” to global leaders. The appeal argues that Russia’s war aims extend beyond territorial gains, seeking to dismantle the existing world order. It warns against a negotiated peace that cedes Ukrainian territory, asserting this would embolden aggressors and destabilize global security. Conversely, a decisive defeat of Russia’s aggression is presented as crucial for restoring global stability and averting wider conflict.
Read More
Zelenskyy asserts that Putin is unresponsive to dialogue, likening him to a destructive force rather than a rational actor. He contrasts Putin’s focus on violence with figures like Elon Musk, emphasizing the futility of attempting appeasement. Instead, Zelenskyy advocates for a position of strength, arguing that only demonstrable power can influence Putin’s actions and achieve peace. This approach, he suggests, aligns with the principle of “peace through strength,” rejecting attempts to engage with Putin on a subjective or personal level.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker