The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the soon-to-be President’s appeal, finding no errors in the lower court’s rulings. The court determined the appellant failed to demonstrate any prejudicial error impacting his substantial rights. Consequently, a new trial was deemed unwarranted. The ruling emphasizes the insufficient evidence presented to overturn the lower court’s decisions.
The appeals court’s unanimous decision to uphold the verdict against Donald Trump in E. Jean Carroll’s sexual abuse lawsuit is a significant development. This affirmation underscores the gravity of the court’s original findings, solidifying the legal conclusion that Trump is liable for his actions. The court’s rejection of Trump’s attempts to challenge Judge Kaplan’s rulings reinforces the strength of the evidence presented and the soundness of the legal process followed.
The appeals court’s ruling leaves little room for doubt regarding the core findings of the case. The legal process clearly established a pathway to justice for Carroll, and the appellate court’s affirmation of the lower court’s decision provides a robust legal precedent.… Continue reading
A federal appeals court upheld a jury’s finding that Donald Trump is liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, affirming the $5 million damages award. Trump plans to appeal this decision, as well as a separate $83.3 million defamation verdict, potentially delaying Carroll’s receipt of the funds well into next year. The appeals process could involve an en banc review by the Second Circuit and ultimately, a petition to the Supreme Court. The court’s decision rejected Trump’s arguments against the admissibility of key evidence, including the “Access Hollywood” tape and testimony from other women who accused him of similar misconduct.
A federal appeals court upheld a lower court’s ruling against Donald Trump, rejecting his appeal of a jury verdict finding him liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll. The court dismissed Trump’s arguments that the inclusion of testimony from other women who accused him of sexual misconduct and his own statements on the Access Hollywood tape were erroneous. The judges affirmed the jury’s assessment of the facts, stating that even if some evidentiary rulings were flawed, they did not affect Trump’s substantial rights. Trump’s repeated denials and accusations against Carroll were deemed irrelevant to the court’s decision.
Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million defamation verdict. The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld the verdict, rejecting Trump’s arguments for dismissal. This decision solidifies Carroll’s win, awarding her $5 million in damages for sexual abuse and defamation stemming from a 1996 incident and a subsequent Truth Social post.
The original verdict stemmed from Carroll’s accusation of rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room. While the jury didn’t find Trump guilty of rape, they did find him liable for sexual assault and defamation. This ruling followed an earlier verdict against Trump, ordering him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for defamation relating to a separate statement denying her claims.… Continue reading
The appeals court’s rejection of Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the E. Jean Carroll verdict underscores a significant legal setback for the former president. This decision, upholding the jury’s finding of sexual abuse and defamation, stands as a potent symbol against the normalization of such behavior, especially from those in positions of power.
The court’s affirmation of the verdict reinforces the gravity of the accusations against Trump. The inclusion of a deposition tape as evidence, highlighting a pattern of alleged non-consensual actions, solidifies the judge’s perception of the evidence and the jury’s decision. This strengthens the case against Trump, underscoring the potential for a broader understanding of his behavior beyond a single incident.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood