The Trump administration revoked over 1,500 student visas, citing national security concerns related to political activities like pro-Palestinian protests. Subsequently, many universities disenrolled affected students based on terminated SEVIS records. However, a Michigan court ruling and DHS court filings confirmed that SEVIS termination does not automatically revoke legal immigration status. This revelation exposes the universities’ actions as potentially unlawful, as the basis for disenrollment was faulty. Despite this, the DHS website still incorrectly implies that SEVIS termination ends legal status, leaving many students and institutions in uncertainty.
Read More
Following a court ruling, the Prime Minister reiterated his previously stated definition of a woman as an “adult female,” aligning with comments made by Sir Keir Starmer in various interviews throughout 2023 and 2024. While Sir Keir initially criticized similar statements by Rosie Duffield, he later affirmed her biologically accurate assertion about cervixes. The Prime Minister welcomed the court’s decision for providing clarity on guidance, emphasizing the need for updated policies. Despite this, the Prime Minister’s spokesperson declined to comment on the implications for using preferred pronouns for transgender women, while still insisting on the importance of treating all individuals with dignity and respect.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered Elon Musk to release documents revealing the identities of staff and internal records related to his “department of government efficiency,” Doge. This order stems from a lawsuit alleging Musk unconstitutionally exercised powers reserved for Senate-confirmed officials. The judge ruled that the requested documents are necessary to determine the scope of Doge’s authority and whether its actions should be halted. The ruling follows a separate decision ordering Doge to release documents to a watchdog group due to its “unprecedented” power and secrecy. The White House’s attempts to shield Musk’s activities through claims of executive privilege were rejected.
Read More
A federal appeals court upheld R. Kelly’s 30-year sentence for racketeering and sex trafficking, rejecting his claims of inadequate evidence, juror bias, and improper trial rulings. The court found that Kelly leveraged his fame over 25 years to abuse numerous girls and young women, aided by his entourage. The appeals court deemed the evidence, including graphic videos, admissible, and concluded that the racketeering charge was appropriately applied. Despite a partial dissent regarding a restitution award, the conviction and sentence remain in effect.
Read More
A New York court initially fined Donald Trump $454 million for fraudulently overvaluing his assets, a ruling he is appealing. Trump claims this was politically motivated “lawfare,” citing the alleged improper handling of his case by judges. While an appeals court showed skepticism towards the initial ruling, Trump still faces over $500 million in fines. His appeal, secured with a $175 million bond from a less-than-reputable surety company, hinges on overturning the original verdict.
Read More
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the soon-to-be President’s appeal, finding no errors in the lower court’s rulings. The court determined the appellant failed to demonstrate any prejudicial error impacting his substantial rights. Consequently, a new trial was deemed unwarranted. The ruling emphasizes the insufficient evidence presented to overturn the lower court’s decisions.
Read More
The appeals court’s unanimous decision to uphold the verdict against Donald Trump in E. Jean Carroll’s sexual abuse lawsuit is a significant development. This affirmation underscores the gravity of the court’s original findings, solidifying the legal conclusion that Trump is liable for his actions. The court’s rejection of Trump’s attempts to challenge Judge Kaplan’s rulings reinforces the strength of the evidence presented and the soundness of the legal process followed.
The appeals court’s ruling leaves little room for doubt regarding the core findings of the case. The legal process clearly established a pathway to justice for Carroll, and the appellate court’s affirmation of the lower court’s decision provides a robust legal precedent.… Continue reading
A federal appeals court upheld a jury’s finding that Donald Trump is liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, affirming the $5 million damages award. Trump plans to appeal this decision, as well as a separate $83.3 million defamation verdict, potentially delaying Carroll’s receipt of the funds well into next year. The appeals process could involve an en banc review by the Second Circuit and ultimately, a petition to the Supreme Court. The court’s decision rejected Trump’s arguments against the admissibility of key evidence, including the “Access Hollywood” tape and testimony from other women who accused him of similar misconduct.
Read More
A federal appeals court upheld a lower court’s ruling against Donald Trump, rejecting his appeal of a jury verdict finding him liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll. The court dismissed Trump’s arguments that the inclusion of testimony from other women who accused him of sexual misconduct and his own statements on the Access Hollywood tape were erroneous. The judges affirmed the jury’s assessment of the facts, stating that even if some evidentiary rulings were flawed, they did not affect Trump’s substantial rights. Trump’s repeated denials and accusations against Carroll were deemed irrelevant to the court’s decision.
Read More
Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million defamation verdict. The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld the verdict, rejecting Trump’s arguments for dismissal. This decision solidifies Carroll’s win, awarding her $5 million in damages for sexual abuse and defamation stemming from a 1996 incident and a subsequent Truth Social post.
The original verdict stemmed from Carroll’s accusation of rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room. While the jury didn’t find Trump guilty of rape, they did find him liable for sexual assault and defamation. This ruling followed an earlier verdict against Trump, ordering him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for defamation relating to a separate statement denying her claims.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood