Antisemitism in Higher Education

Conservative DEI Push Sparks Debate on Qualifications and Political Bias

Johns Hopkins University, concerned about the lack of conservative voices in academia, has partnered with the American Enterprise Institute to promote ideological diversity. This initiative, mirroring similar efforts at other universities, aims to address the underrepresentation of conservatives through various programs including cluster hiring, mentorship, and fellowships. The initiative seeks to broaden the applicant pool and create a more inclusive environment for conservative scholars, thereby enriching the academic discourse and improving public perception of higher education. This approach utilizes strategies similar to those employed in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, but focuses on political viewpoint rather than race or ethnicity. Critics, however, question whether this constitutes affirmative action for conservatives.

Read More

Trump Admin Threatens to Defund Harvard: A Political Assault on Higher Education

The Trump administration plans to terminate approximately $100 million in federal funding to Harvard University. This action follows ongoing legal battles between the university and the White House, stemming from the administration’s blocking of funding and restrictions on international student enrollment. The administration alleges Harvard fails to address anti-semitism and promotes a liberal bias. Federal agencies will be instructed to find alternative vendors for the affected contracts.

Read More

WSJ Editorial Board Condemns Trump: America’s Decline Under His Presidency

The Wall Street Journal editorial board condemned the Trump administration’s attempt to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll international students, deeming the action detrimental to America’s global standing and competitiveness. The administration’s actions, including withholding funds from Columbia University and terminating grants for Harvard, stem from accusations of antisemitism on campuses and demands to reform DEI programs. The Journal argued that this approach harms America’s ability to attract top international talent, contrasting it with the administration’s other protectionist policies. Harvard subsequently obtained a court order allowing continued enrollment of international students while the case proceeds.

Read More

Trump Administration Blocks Harvard’s International Student Enrollment

In a significant escalation of its conflict with Harvard University, the Trump administration revoked the university’s ability to enroll international students. This action followed disagreements over a records request stemming from a Department of Homeland Security investigation. The move is expected to result in further legal action from Harvard, adding to the ongoing lawsuit challenging administration-imposed changes to the university’s operations. This action directly targets a major funding source for the institution.

Read More

Penn State Campus Closures Reflect Pennsylvania’s Population Decline

Penn State proposes closing seven Commonwealth campuses due to Pennsylvania’s projected population decline, particularly in rural areas, and resulting decreased enrollment. The 143-page report cites a shrinking pool of potential students and unsustainable financial situations at the affected campuses, some experiencing enrollment drops exceeding 40%. The university aims to shift from a geographically-based model to a mission-based approach, prioritizing educational quality, regional relevance, and financial stability. The closures, pending board approval, would not take effect before spring 2027, with current and prospective students offered options to complete their degrees.

Read More

Harvard Sues Trump Administration Over Authoritarian Higher Education Policies

Harvard University’s lawsuit against the Trump administration is a significant event, highlighting a clash between the government and a prestigious academic institution. The lawsuit stems from what many perceive as an unconstitutional and authoritarian overreach by the administration. The administration’s actions, ostensibly aimed at combating antisemitism on college campuses, are viewed by many as a thinly veiled attempt to control academic discourse and suppress dissenting viewpoints.

The administration’s demands on universities are extensive and intrusive. They include demands for detailed reporting on foreign students, allowing government-appointed overseers to ensure adherence to specific viewpoints, providing access to all hiring and admissions data to influence personnel decisions, and shutting down programs deemed to promote opposing ideologies.… Continue reading

Algeria Ditches French, Adopts English for University Studies

Algeria’s recent decision to replace French with English as the language of instruction in its universities is a significant development, signaling a shift in the country’s educational and geopolitical landscape. The ministry’s directive, issued in early April, mandates a complete transition to English for first-year medical and scientific courses starting in September 2025. This bold move raises several interesting questions.

The proficiency level of the average Algerian student in English is a crucial factor. While anecdotal evidence suggests a preference for English among younger Algerians, particularly in urban areas, mirroring trends observed in neighboring Morocco and Tunisia, the overall level of English fluency remains to be seen.… Continue reading

Harvard Defies Trump Administration Demands

Harvard University rejected the Trump administration’s demands for sweeping changes to its operations in exchange for $9 billion in research funding. These demands, which included audits of academic programs and alterations to governance, were deemed unlawful infringements on the university’s independence and constitutional rights. The administration subsequently froze $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts. Harvard maintains its commitment to fighting antisemitism but insists these objectives will not be achieved through governmental overreach. The threatened funding cuts jeopardize vital research partnerships crucial to American innovation and global competitiveness.

Read More

WH’s Harvard Dispute: Accidental Attack, Unrepentant Response

A letter containing extreme demands regarding Harvard’s policies on hiring, admissions, and curriculum, was mistakenly sent by a senior Trump administration official. The letter, though authentic in content, was reportedly sent prematurely or intended for internal use. Despite the administration now claiming the letter was an error, the demands remain, and Harvard’s federal funding has been frozen, prompting the university to publicly reject the terms. The administration has not rescinded its demands or reversed the funding freeze.

Read More

Big Ten Faculty Unite Against Trump Administration Attacks

Michigan State University’s Faculty Senate passed a resolution urging Big Ten universities to create a “mutual defense compact” against the Trump administration’s attacks on higher education. This compact would involve a shared defense fund providing legal, communication, and legislative support to any member institution facing political or legal infringement. The resolution follows similar actions by faculty senates at other universities, including Rutgers and Nebraska. While MSU leadership’s response remains uncertain, faculty express hope based on previous public pushback against the administration’s actions.

Read More