A leaked Justice Department memo from Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the FBI to establish a cash reward system targeting “Antifa-aligned extremists” and those promoting “radical gender ideology” for domestic terrorism investigations. The memo outlines priorities that diverge from addressing the far-right extremism linked to the majority of domestic terrorist incidents, and instead focuses on viewpoints related to immigration and anti-American sentiment. These actions align with a trend of shifting blame away from far-right actors, despite data demonstrating their significant role in domestic terrorism, including an increase in attacks in recent years. Furthermore, the memo’s focus on leftist groups and gender ideology appears to follow a pattern of downplaying far-right extremism, as evidenced by related events and the removal of data that contradicted the framing.
Read More
During a congressional hearing on Thursday, an FBI official identified the anti-fascist movement, Antifa, as the most significant domestic terrorism threat facing the United States. Michael Glasheen, the operations director of the FBI’s National Security Branch, struggled to provide concrete details about Antifa’s structure and membership, citing the “fluid” nature of the group and ongoing investigations. Despite criticism from committee members, an FBI spokesperson defended Glasheen’s statements, emphasizing the agency’s efforts to pursue violent actors associated with Antifa. The hearing also highlighted partisan divides, with discussions including immigration policies and vetting standards.
Read More
During a House Homeland Security Committee hearing, FBI operations director Michael Glasheen identified antifa as the most immediate violent domestic terrorist threat. However, when pressed for specifics, Glasheen struggled to answer basic questions about the organization’s structure, location, or membership size. This prompted criticism from committee members, who questioned the validity of the assessment and accused the administration of manufacturing a threat. Observers and commentators were stunned by Glasheen’s lack of knowledge, suggesting the administration was prioritizing a fabricated narrative over real threats.
Read More
During a House hearing, a top FBI official designated antifa as a major domestic terror threat while struggling to provide concrete details about the leaderless movement. The FBI’s operations director, Michael Glasheen, was unable to answer questions regarding antifa’s size, location, or membership, despite Trump’s previous designation and directive to investigate the group. Glasheen’s response, citing “active” investigations and the fluid nature of the movement, highlighted the challenges in classifying a decentralized entity as a terrorist organization. This focus on antifa contrasts with research showing historical levels of violence by right-wing and jihadist attackers have been significantly higher.
Read More
Yoo argues that the actions against Venezuela and its drug cartels are more akin to preventing criminal activity than a justified act of war based on the administration’s current justifications. He highlights the irony of the situation given his past support of unilateral actions and war crimes. Yoo believes the only legal justification for these strikes would be if Venezuela’s drug cartels were acting as an extension of their armed forces. The administration’s failure to legally justify the strikes is problematic, according to Yoo, raising concerns about the true nature of the actions.
Read More
The recent designation of several European anti-fascist groups as foreign terrorist organizations by the US State Department has been met with skepticism by experts who question the groups’ capabilities and relevance. These groups, primarily protest collectives, are perceived as posing no active threat to the US. Experts suggest that the designation may be politically motivated, potentially aimed at shifting attention away from far-right terrorism, which is on the rise. Moreover, the groups lack substantial organization and funding, and have not explicitly targeted the US, making the classification seem incongruous.
Read More
The US government’s recent decision to designate several European anti-fascist and related groups as terrorist organizations, including Germany’s Antifa Ost, has been met with both support and concern. The far-right Alternative für Deutschland party welcomed the move, urging similar action from European governments. However, historians and anti-fascist scholars warn that such a designation sets a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to a broader crackdown on left-wing activism, especially as far-right groups gain political traction. The US State Department’s decision could result in asset freezing and travel bans for the targeted groups, prompting discussions on the broad definition of “antifa” and the potential for misapplication of the term.
Read More
Federal prosecutors have filed terrorism charges against two individuals involved in a July 4th protest at the Prairieland Detention Center in Texas, marking the first time such charges have been linked to “antifa” activity. The individuals are accused of providing material support to terrorists and aiding in the attempted murder of government officers, though neither is accused of firing the shot that injured a police officer. This case is seen as a concerning precedent for how the government may use counterterrorism efforts to suppress dissent and criminalize protest movements. The indictment cites typical activist activities and the use of encrypted messaging as evidence, raising concerns about overreach and the chilling effect on free speech.
Read More
The upcoming “No Kings” protests are expected to be large, sparking accusations from prominent Republicans who claim the demonstrations are fueled by “antifa” and “Soros-paid protestors.” Organizers, including Indivisible and the American Federation of Teachers, dismiss these claims, emphasizing their focus on peaceful assembly and citizen participation. They highlight the diverse composition of their groups and the efforts made in de-escalation training and community care. Ultimately, the organizers believe the criticism is an attempt to undermine the right to protest against a government that they view as overreaching and undemocratic.
Read More
Trump’s allies are attempting to label the “No Kings” marches as “Hate America” rallies, associating them with violence and treason. This smear campaign aims to silence dissent and potentially incite civilian paramilitaries. The administration has declared a war on “antifa” which may lead to escalated policing crackdowns and could even invoke the Insurrection Act. The organizers of the event, including Indivisible, are committed to nonviolence and detailed information on running legal and safe events. The true objective of the protests is to challenge the administration’s narrative and demonstrate the peaceful exercise of democratic rights.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker