In a closed-door Senate Republican meeting, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced intense backlash regarding a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, which drew accusations of self-dealing and derailed an immigration funding vote. Senators reportedly “blasted” and “screamed at the attorney general,” expressing concern that the fund appeared to be a deal President Trump made with himself. This significant Republican opposition signals a potential “full-on revolt” if the administration does not modify the fund before Congress reconvenes.
Read More
Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, have filed a lawsuit to block payouts from a new $1.776 billion settlement fund. The officers allege the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is an illegal slush fund intended to benefit individuals who committed politically motivated acts, including those who assaulted law enforcement during the Capitol riot. This legal challenge contends the fund, stemming from a settlement of Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, is a “corrupt sham” that incentivizes violence and improperly rewards insurrectionists.
Read More
Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot have filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, seeking to block a new $1.8 billion “lawfare” fund. The suit alleges this taxpayer-funded “slush fund,” styled the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” is illegal, corrupt, and designed to compensate individuals involved in the insurrection. The plaintiffs, former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and active Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, contend the fund violates the 14th Amendment by assuming or paying debts incurred in aid of rebellion. They also assert that the fund endangers their lives by encouraging further violence from those who attacked the Capitol.
Read More
It’s quite something to consider the situation where a former President, Donald Trump, not only sued his own government but subsequently reached a settlement involving nearly $2 billion and, perhaps most astonishingly, a supposed “forever” ban on the IRS auditing his family or businesses. This entire scenario raises a cascade of questions and concerns about accountability, the rule of law, and the integrity of our financial and governmental systems.
The core of this issue revolves around a substantial fund, reportedly around $1.8 billion, designated as an “anti-weaponization” fund. What makes this particularly jarring is the alleged intention for some of these funds to be directed towards political allies, and even, as Trump himself has reportedly indicated, potentially to those involved in the January 6th events.… Continue reading
The Treasury’s General Counsel, Brian Morrissey, resigned just hours after the Trump administration announced a $1.776 billion fund intended to compensate individuals allegedly targeted by the Biden administration’s Justice Department, a sum that could include those charged in connection with the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. This abrupt departure occurred on the same day acting Attorney General Todd Blanche revealed the “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” which originated from Donald Trump’s dropped lawsuit against the IRS. The fund, overseen by a commission appointed by Blanche, has drawn widespread condemnation from Democrats who denounce it as a misuse of taxpayer funds, with recipients and payout amounts to remain undisclosed.
Read More
President Donald Trump and the Justice Department have finalized a settlement concerning a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Trump against the IRS. This agreement establishes a $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” to compensate individuals deemed by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as “victims of lawfare and weaponization.” As part of the deal, Trump will drop claims related to the Russia investigation and the Mar-a-Lago raid, and while the Trump family will receive a formal apology, they will not receive monetary damages.
Read More
President Donald Trump has dropped his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS in exchange for a $1.8 billion settlement to establish “The Anti-Weaponization Fund.” This fund, overseen by a commission appointed by the Attorney General, aims to provide redress for individuals who claim to have been unfairly prosecuted by the government. Critics, including House Democrats, have characterized the lawsuit and subsequent settlement as collusive and the fund as a “slush fund” designed to benefit Trump and his allies. This action follows Trump’s long-held assertion that he and his supporters have been targeted by the Biden administration, with the IRS settlement potentially funding future actions against political opponents.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood