Donald Trump narrowly won the popular vote in the recent election, securing the presidency with a smaller margin than any other winner since 2000. Despite this victory, Democrats unexpectedly performed well in down-ballot races, winning four Senate seats in states Trump carried, a stark contrast to previous election cycles. This suggests a lack of significant Republican coattails and calls into question the narrative of a sweeping popular mandate for Trump’s agenda. The election results ultimately hinge on a small shift in late-deciding voters primarily concerned with economic issues, not a broad endorsement of Trump’s far-reaching and controversial proposals.
Read More
My Supreme Court victory in *Trump v. United States* secured a historic win on presidential immunity, crucial in countering the “lawfare” attacks against me and the MAGA movement. During arguments, I successfully argued for broad presidential immunity, even extending to hypothetical scenarios involving actions such as assassinations. While acknowledging hypotheticals, my position maintained that such actions, if deemed “official acts,” would fall under this immunity. This ruling is a key defense against politically motivated legal challenges.
Read More
Mark Meadows’ attempt to move his Georgia election interference case to federal court was unsuccessful, as the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him based on his current lack of federal employment and the unrelated nature of the charges to his former duties. While Trump’s reelection may impact the prosecution of his co-defendants, his own case is likely on hold or dismissed due to presidential immunity. The Georgia Court of Appeals is set to hear arguments on December 5 regarding Trump’s request to remove District Attorney Fani Willis from the case, but this schedule could change following his victory.
Read More
Donald Trump’s appointment of Pete Hegseth as a potential Secretary of Defense is driven by superficial appearances rather than qualifications. While Hegseth’s lack of experience and expertise in defense policy is concerning, his “manly” image and ability to appeal to the “MAGA” movement’s idealized vision of masculinity have made him a suitable candidate for Trump. Hegseth embodies a fragile masculinity, craving a military dominated by white men, where diversity is seen as a threat and women are relegated to supporting roles. Trump’s choice of Hegseth further underscores his preference for superficial appearances and his disdain for genuine expertise and experience, mirroring his own reliance on manufactured success and image over real achievements.
Read More
Democrats’ calls for unity and civility in the wake of Trump’s victory are misguided and ultimately futile. This approach ignores the reality that Republicans, especially under Trump’s leadership, are driven by fear and paranoia, fueled by a constant stream of manufactured enemies. Their notion of “unity” is simply conformity, demanding that those deemed different silence themselves or disappear. This approach not only fails to understand the nature of fascism but also inadvertently enables it by falsely suggesting that Trump and his supporters can be reasoned with. The only solution is for people to recognize the inherent danger of this hate-mongering and refuse to reward it with power.
Read More
Despite Donald Trump’s repeated denials, a prominent MAGA figure has claimed that Project 2025, a manifesto outlining conservative policy goals for the next Republican president, is “the agenda.” This assertion, made by conservative commentator Matt Walsh and endorsed by former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, comes after Trump’s victory in the recent election. While Trump has criticized some of Project 2025’s proposals, including its plans for abortion and immigration, Democrats have pointed to the involvement of former Trump aides in the project. The Heritage Foundation, the think tank that created Project 2025, has congratulated Trump on his victory, while the project’s 900-page document has been described by critics as a blueprint for replacing the rule of law with right-wing ideology.
Read More
The appointment of Jeffrey Davis, a former clerk for Justice Neil Gorsuch and self-proclaimed “Trump’s viceroy,” as a potential head of the Justice Department signifies a dangerous shift in the department’s direction. Davis’s lack of restraint and his aggressive stance against special counsel Jack Smith, who investigated Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, are clear indicators of his intent to use the DOJ for retribution and political maneuvering. This appointment, coupled with the departure of many conservative lawyers who refused to participate in Trump’s efforts to subvert the law, highlights the growing influence of MAGA loyalists within the Justice Department, a trend that poses a significant threat to the rule of law and democratic institutions.
Read More
Vice President Kamala Harris is polling significantly higher than Donald Trump among women, according to an ABC News/Ipsos national poll. Harris has a 14% lead over Trump overall with women, which increases to 23% for women with a college degree and 34% for women under the age of 40. The Brookings Institution credits Harris’ popularity with older voters to the 2022 Dobbs Supreme Court decision, which restricted abortion rights. Prominent pro-Trump figures have voiced concern over these poll numbers, especially as early voting data indicates a majority of female voters. In Pennsylvania, for example, 56% of mail-in ballots have come from women so far.
Read More
Prominent right-wing influencers Mike Cernovich and Charlie Kirk have expressed concern over the early voting turnout among women which could negatively impact Donald Trump’s chances of victory. A Politico analysis showed a 10% gender gap in early voting, with women constituting 55% of early voters. Cernovich praised Trump’s strategy of targeting male audiences through podcast appearances but criticised the campaign’s engagement with women voters.
Read More
Trump’s recent rally in New York City was not simply an event focused on generating political support or encouraging civic engagement; it was a grotesque showcase of what I can only describe as an emerging MAGA future steeped in hatred and intolerance. Watching the rally unfold was like watching a live-action horror show, where the grotesque elements of bigotry, disdain for democracy, and a blatant call for violence were paraded as if they were virtues. I felt a sickness in my stomach, a visceral reaction to the hatred emanating from the crowd and, disturbingly, from the podium itself.
This wasn’t just a normal campaign appearance.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood