Israel’s recent push for US involvement in a war against Iran to eliminate its nuclear program is, to put it mildly, a complex issue. The underlying assumption seems to be that a swift military strike, ideally with US backing, is the only viable solution to what Israel perceives as an existential threat.
However, the practicality of such a scenario is immediately questionable. Even assuming the US possessed the political will for another Middle Eastern conflict – a considerable assumption given public sentiment – the logistical hurdles are immense. The argument that Israel lacks the necessary military capabilities to independently neutralize Iranian nuclear facilities is a valid one.… Continue reading
Following Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Iran issued a warning to the U.S., U.K., and France, threatening retaliatory strikes on their regional bases and ships if they intervene. Despite denials of military support from the UK and US, Iran launched missile strikes on Israel in response. International calls for de-escalation, including from the UN Secretary-General, have been made, while some suggest the current conflict might offer Iran a renewed opportunity to negotiate a nuclear deal. Tensions remain extremely high in the Middle East.
Read More
Esmail Qaani, successor to Qasem Soleimani as commander of the Quds Force, was killed in an Israeli strike. His mission encompassed multiple objectives, including maintaining and expanding Iran’s influence throughout the Middle East, a focus closely monitored by international intelligence agencies. A key element of this mission involved strengthening control over Iraqi Shia militias, such as Hashd al-Shaabi, to prevent the unraveling of Iran’s proxy network. This consolidation of power aimed to solidify Iran’s regional influence and further the goals of the Iranian leadership.
Read More
Following separate calls with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Iranian President Pezeshkian, President Putin condemned Israel’s strikes on Iran as violations of the UN Charter and international law. The Kremlin emphasized Russia’s readiness to mediate to prevent further escalation and highlighted the potential for disastrous regional consequences. Russia’s Foreign Ministry similarly denounced the strikes as unacceptable acts of aggression threatening global security, particularly given their timing during ongoing international discussions. This condemnation underscores Russia’s position amidst heightened tensions between Israel and Iran.
Read More
Stay informed on the latest news with U.S. News Decision Points, a weekday email newsletter. This trusted source delivers timely updates from the U.S. News & World Report team. Subscription is simple and provides access to breaking news. By signing up, users agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. Receive the latest information and insights by subscribing today.
Read More
Despite President Trump’s assertion that Israeli strikes on Iran are “the greatest thing ever for the market,” stock markets experienced a significant downturn, with major indexes falling approximately 1%, and oil prices surged by about 7%. This market reaction contradicts Trump’s optimistic prediction, which was based on the belief that the strikes would prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Conflicting reports emerged regarding U.S. involvement, with Trump denying prior knowledge while Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu claimed the U.S. was informed beforehand.
Read More
Trump’s recent comments regarding Israeli strikes on Iran have sparked a wave of reactions, ranging from praise to outrage. He declared the strikes “excellent,” adding a chilling prediction: “more to come.” This statement immediately throws into sharp relief his past pronouncements on avoiding new wars. The stark contrast between his current stance and previous campaign promises fuels intense debate about his foreign policy and the potential consequences of his rhetoric.
The seeming contradiction between his earlier campaign pledge of “no new wars” and his current enthusiastic endorsement of Israeli actions in Iran is jarring. This abrupt shift in perspective raises serious questions about the consistency and reliability of his foreign policy views.… Continue reading
Following Israeli airstrikes on Iranian targets, including the killing of Iran’s armed forces chief of staff, French President Macron spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and other world leaders, urging restraint and de-escalation to prevent regional instability. Macron affirmed Israel’s right to self-defense while simultaneously calling for all parties to exercise maximum restraint. A planned address on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was cancelled, as France focused on protecting its citizens and interests in the region. These events occurred amidst already strained relations between France and Israel.
Read More
Hezbollah has informed Reuters that it will not retaliate against Israel for recent attacks on Iranian targets. This statement clarifies the group’s position following increased regional tensions. The decision underscores a potential de-escalation strategy, although the overall regional security situation remains volatile. However, Hezbollah’s future actions remain contingent on further developments.
Read More
Following Friday morning’s successful Israeli airstrikes on Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility, reports emerged of further Israeli action near Fordow. Iranian media documented explosions near Fordow and claimed interception of an Israeli drone. The IDF possesses the technological capacity to inflict significant damage, potentially causing a cave-in at the mountain-based Fordow facility. These events represent a significant escalation of the ongoing conflict surrounding Iran’s nuclear program.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker