Reports indicate Elon Musk privately urged Reddit CEO Steve Huffman to remove content critical of his Department of Government Efficiency employees, leading to the deletion of a r/WhitePeopleTwitter thread and a temporary subreddit ban. Reddit cited “violent content” as the reason for the ban, though the extent to which Musk’s request influenced their decision remains unclear. This action sparked significant backlash from Reddit users, highlighting the perceived hypocrisy of Musk’s involvement given his past advocacy for free speech. A Reddit spokesperson confirmed their standard policy of investigating reported policy violations.
Read More
Elon Musk’s recent complaints about Democrats celebrating Tesla’s declining stock price contrast sharply with his past actions, including celebrating job losses. Public disapproval of Musk is widespread, with two-thirds of Americans stating they would not buy a Tesla, largely due to their negative perception of Musk himself. This negative sentiment is fueled by Musk’s controversial statements and actions, including attacks on political figures and concerns about his influence on the government. A majority of Americans now believe Musk holds excessive influence over Trump, further contributing to the public backlash.
Read More
According to Gawker founder Nick Denton, Elon Musk’s actions on X demonstrate a focus on appeasing a small, extreme segment of his audience, mirroring similar strategies employed by Joe Rogan and even previously by Gawker itself. This prioritization of a niche audience, exemplified by Musk’s use of inflammatory rhetoric, leaves him vulnerable, as it neglects a broader, potentially more influential, median voter. Denton argues that this strategy currently dominates online discourse, hindering a move towards centrism. Ultimately, however, the median voter and market forces will eventually assert their influence.
Read More
A new report reveals that Elon Musk’s cost-cutting measures within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are likely to increase, rather than decrease, the national deficit. Despite initial claims of $2 trillion in savings, actual savings are estimated to be far lower, around $2 billion. These cuts, particularly to the IRS, are projected to significantly reduce tax revenue, outweighing any purported savings. Furthermore, legal battles and the privatization of government functions are expected to generate substantial additional costs. The overall effect is a weakening of government functionality without fiscal improvement.
Read More
A federal judge has allowed a class-action lawsuit against Elon Musk to proceed, rejecting Musk’s motion to dismiss. The suit alleges that Musk’s delayed disclosure of his Twitter stock purchases artificially deflated share prices, causing losses for former shareholders. The judge found that Musk’s actions, including a misleading tweet, created a false market signal. This ruling follows a similar lawsuit filed by the SEC and comes as Musk recently announced the merger of his AI venture, xAI, with X (formerly Twitter).
Read More
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit to prevent Elon Musk from distributing $2 million to two voters before the state’s Supreme Court election, alleging this constitutes an illegal attempt to buy votes and violates state election laws. Musk, through his America PAC, claims the money is for “spokespeople” promoting a petition against “activist judges,” which offers additional financial incentives for participation. This election is highly contested, with national implications and record-breaking fundraising, shaping the court’s future ideological balance. The lawsuit highlights concerns over the fairness and integrity of the election process.
Read More
The Wisconsin Democratic Party chair has leveled a serious accusation against Elon Musk, alleging that the tech mogul engaged in illegal activities during the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court race. The accusation centers around Musk’s offer of $1 million to voters who supported Republican candidate Brad Schimel. This alleged action is described as a blatant felony, a direct violation of election laws prohibiting the offering of money in exchange for votes.
The claim is that Musk’s actions constitute election bribery, a clear violation of Wisconsin state statute. This statute specifically prohibits offering anything of value, including any amount of money exceeding $1, to influence a voter’s decision.… Continue reading
Wisconsin’s Attorney General has initiated legal action against Elon Musk concerning his controversial offer of cash incentives tied to voting outcomes in the state. This bold move comes in response to Musk’s actions, which many perceive as a blatant attempt to influence the election through financial means. The implications of this legal challenge are far-reaching, potentially setting a significant precedent for future cases involving wealthy individuals and their influence on electoral processes.
The legal action underscores the gravity of the situation and the determination of Wisconsin authorities to uphold the integrity of the election. It’s a direct challenge to Musk’s assertion that he can operate outside the bounds of established laws simply because of his immense wealth.… Continue reading
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit on Friday seeking to prevent Elon Musk from distributing $1 million in funds to voters before the state’s upcoming Supreme Court election. The lawsuit aims to halt the distribution, citing concerns about potential election interference. The action comes less than a week before the crucial election. The attorney general argues Musk’s actions could violate campaign finance laws.
Read More
Elon Musk’s xAI purchasing the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) for a reported $45 billion in an all-stock transaction has ignited a firestorm of controversy. The deal, announced by Musk himself, immediately raised eyebrows due to the sheer scale and the perceived lack of transparency surrounding the valuation. The $45 billion price tag, coupled with xAI’s own relatively recent and highly speculative valuation, has led many to question the legitimacy of the transaction.
The core issue lies in the apparent discrepancy between the stated value of X and the perceived value of xAI. X, despite its considerable user base, has experienced significant financial instability and operational challenges since Musk’s initial acquisition.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood