A Wisconsin watchdog group, joined by two voters, filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, his super PAC America PAC, and another Musk-owned entity, alleging unlawful bribery and lottery violations during the state Supreme Court election. The suit claims Musk offered $100 and million-dollar checks to voters who signed a petition supporting a specific candidate, actions the plaintiffs argue undermined voter faith in the electoral process. The complaint cites instances of recipients publicly endorsing the candidate after receiving the money, and seeks to prevent future similar actions. This lawsuit follows a similar, but unsuccessful, attempt by the Wisconsin Attorney General. The plaintiffs contend Musk’s actions constitute election bribery and civil conspiracy.
Read More
Following Donald Trump’s controversial 2024 election win over Kamala Harris, a Wisconsin nonprofit filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, alleging that he and his political allies violated state election laws. The complaint centers on Musk’s distribution of significant sums of money to voters in Wisconsin and other swing states, allegedly incentivizing them to vote for Trump through schemes that circumvented legal limits on campaign contributions. These actions, which included cash payments and lotteries, prompted unsuccessful legal challenges prior to the election. The lawsuit seeks to prevent future similar actions and potentially award damages.
Read More
Approximately ten French Tesla owners are suing Elon Musk, seeking early termination of their lease contracts. The lawsuit alleges Musk’s political affiliations and statements have transformed Tesla vehicles into symbols of the far-right, causing the plaintiffs “direct and concrete” damage. This legal action follows a significant drop in Tesla sales across Europe attributed to Musk’s controversial political stances. The plaintiffs argue that the cars’ association with the extreme-right prevents them from fully enjoying their purchases.
Read More
Sahil Lavingia, a tech founder hired by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to modernize VA systems, was unexpectedly dismissed after 55 days. His termination followed a blog interview where he praised the agency’s efficiency, contradicting common perceptions of government waste. Lavingia’s observations focused on opportunities for modernization rather than widespread fraud or abuse. This dismissal, despite DOGE’s stated commitment to transparency under Elon Musk’s leadership, highlights a perceived conflict between the agency’s public image and its internal actions.
Read More
Following a public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, some Democrats are attempting to reconcile with Musk, viewing him as a potentially valuable ally. Several Democratic figures, including Representative Ro Khanna and Senator Cory Booker, have expressed interest in Musk’s support, highlighting his past alignment with Democratic priorities like electric vehicles and space exploration. However, this strategy has faced criticism, with Senator Bernie Sanders labeling Musk a “right-wing extremist,” and others arguing it reflects a flawed system that allows billionaires to exert undue political influence. Ultimately, the attempts to court Musk expose the deeper issues within the political system, where both parties prioritize securing the support of wealthy individuals rather than addressing systemic inequality.
Read More
Anthony Scaramucci, a former Trump White House communications director, doubts allegations of a Trump-Epstein connection, believing such evidence would have already surfaced. Instead, Scaramucci suspects that compromising material held by Vladimir Putin is the true vulnerability. He speculates this could be information gathered during Trump’s real estate career decades ago, explaining Trump’s deference to Putin despite the latter’s weakening global position. This “kompromat,” Scaramucci suggests, is far more damaging than previously speculated “pee tape” scenarios, forcing Trump’s subservient behavior toward Putin.
Read More
Errol Musk, father of Elon Musk, attended the pro-Kremlin Forum of the Future 2050 in Moscow, an event featuring Russian officials like Sergey Lavrov. This occurred amidst Elon Musk’s public conflict with Donald Trump and his increasingly pro-Kremlin statements regarding the war in Ukraine. Errol Musk’s attendance and prior praise of Vladimir Putin draw attention to the complex relationship between Elon Musk’s business interests and geopolitical tensions. The event’s themes, including “Russian Space” and “The Ideology of Sovereign Russia,” highlight its alignment with Kremlin narratives.
Read More
Trump’s recent pronouncements towards Elon Musk represent a stark escalation, a jaw-dropping authoritarian threat cloaked in the language of presidential decorum. The sheer audacity of the implied threat is breathtaking, especially given its thinly veiled nature. It speaks volumes about the current political climate and the increasingly blurred lines between acceptable political discourse and thinly veiled intimidation.
This threat, while not explicitly stated as a direct action, carries the weight of implied consequences. It’s a message aimed not only at Musk, but at anyone daring to criticize or oppose Trump’s agenda. The underlying message is clear: dissent will not be tolerated.… Continue reading
Following a public feud ignited by Elon Musk’s criticism of President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” Trump issued a stark warning. Trump stated that Musk would face “very serious consequences” if he begins funding Democrats. The president cited Musk’s alleged disrespect and claims that their relationship is over. This escalation follows Musk’s social media poll suggesting the need for a third political party and Trump’s dismissal of the threat, citing strong poll numbers. Trump maintains his focus on passing his legislative bill.
Read More
President Trump declared that Elon Musk will face “serious consequences” if he funds Democratic candidates opposing Republicans who support the GOP’s budget bill, though he declined to specify them. Trump stated that he doesn’t wish to reconcile with Musk following their public feud, which stemmed from Musk’s criticism of the budget bill and subsequent attacks on Trump. Trump dismissed Musk’s past allegations as “old news” and expressed confidence in the bill’s passage, even suggesting that the conflict inadvertently strengthened its support. Despite previous support for Trump, Musk’s actions are now seen by Trump as disrespectful to the presidency.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood