Anti-Defamation League

Melania Trump Demands $1 Billion Retraction From Hunter Biden Over Epstein Claims

Melania Trump has issued a $1 billion legal notice to Hunter Biden, alleging defamation due to his statements in a video interview. Biden claimed that Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania to Donald Trump and that their connection was wide and deep. The first lady’s lawyer demanded a retraction and public apology by August 7, or face legal action, citing overwhelming financial and reputational harm. According to Fox News, Biden did not comply with the deadline, and further legal action is expected.

Read More

Bundy Ordered to Pay $52 Million, Likely Won’t, and Trump May Intervene

In a recent ruling, a federal bankruptcy judge denied anti-government activist Ammon Bundy the ability to discharge a $52 million civil judgment through bankruptcy. The judge sided with St. Luke’s Health System, determining that Bundy’s actions in defaming the hospital network were “willful and malicious,” a key factor preventing debt discharge. This decision stems from Bundy’s 2022 claims that St. Luke’s was involved in child trafficking, accusations that led to the original defamation lawsuit and a default judgment against him. The court cited Bundy’s failure to engage in the initial Idaho trial as a factor in the ruling, effectively upholding the original judgment and preventing him from avoiding accountability through bankruptcy.

Read More

Nunes Loses Defamation Lawsuit Against Rachel Maddow

Trump Media CEO Nunes loses defamation lawsuit over Rachel Maddow show, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of…well, satisfaction, to be frank. The news seems to have been greeted with a collective sigh of relief, as if the universe had finally righted itself. This isn’t just about a legal loss; it’s a symbolic one. It’s a resounding “nope” to the relentless pursuit of silencing voices through lawsuits, a tactic that, frankly, has become a bit tiresome. The core of the matter? Nunes, the CEO of Trump Media, sued Rachel Maddow over a segment.

Devin Nunes is claiming Maddow knowingly lied about something regarding him.… Continue reading

Trump Demands Swift Deposition of Murdoch in Epstein Case

Trump asks for swift deposition of Murdoch in Epstein defamation case, and the whole thing feels like a tangled web of political maneuvering, accusations, and the inevitable drama surrounding Donald Trump. It’s hard to ignore the irony here – a man who seems to attract controversy like a magnet is now trying to quickly depose Rupert Murdoch, a media titan, in a case tied to the notorious Jeffrey Epstein. The request for a swift deposition, citing Murdoch’s age, is a strategic move, and it’s hard not to see it as a calculated attempt to gain an advantage.

Given the complexities of the situation, it’s clear Trump’s involvement with Epstein is a hot topic.… Continue reading

MyPillow’s Mike Lindell Loses Defamation Case, Faces Public Scorn

In a defamation case, MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell was ordered to pay $2.3 million to Eric Coomer, a former Dominion Voting Systems employee. The lawsuit stemmed from Lindell’s false accusations that Coomer helped rig the 2020 election. During the trial, Lindell maintained his claims of election fraud, which led to the jury’s decision. Lindell has vowed to appeal the verdict and stated he is in debt as a result.

Read More

Trump Loses Appeal in E. Jean Carroll Sexual Abuse, Defamation Case

In a recent development, a federal appeals court in New York has affirmed the civil jury verdict against former President Donald Trump. The court upheld the decision that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, and which ordered him to pay $5 million in damages. The three-judge panel’s unanimous ruling stated Trump had not proven any errors from the district court that would warrant a new trial. This decision stems from the May 2023 verdict issued by a jury in Manhattan federal court.

Read More

Trump Claims Ignorance of “Shylock” Being Antisemitic After Using Slur

Following a rally in Iowa, President Trump stated he was unaware that some view the term “Shylock” as antisemitic. Trump used the word during the rally to criticize amoral money lenders, referencing the character from Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice.” The Anti-Defamation League condemned Trump’s use of the term, citing its association with antisemitic tropes about Jews and greed. Several figures, including Rep. Daniel Goldman and Amy Spitalnick, have condemned Trump’s use of the word, describing it as blatant antisemitism.

Read More

Newsom Sues Fox News for $787M in Defamation Case Following Dominion Settlement

Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787M in defamation case over Trump call. The news immediately sparks a flurry of thoughts, doesn’t it? It’s hard not to notice the parallel with the Dominion lawsuit, the same settlement amount staring us in the face. Is this a strategic move, a calculated jab at Fox News, or perhaps a little bit of both? The sheer audacity of it is fascinating. It’s a clear message, a strong stance against what many perceive as a biased media outlet.

This lawsuit, however, isn’t a walk in the park. Legal battles against media giants are notoriously tough, especially for public figures.… Continue reading

Trump’s $5 Million Carroll Verdict Stands

The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Donald Trump’s request to reconsider the $5 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll’s sexual abuse and defamation case. The court upheld its December 2024 decision affirming the jury’s finding that Trump sexually abused and defamed Carroll. Trump’s arguments for reconsideration centered on the admission of the “Access Hollywood” tape and testimony from other women alleging similar misconduct. This ruling comes separate from a pending appeal of an $83.3 million defamation verdict against Trump in the same case, where he invokes Supreme Court precedent on presidential immunity.

Read More

Trump’s Education Secretary Fails Basic Math in Hearing

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka filed a federal lawsuit against New Jersey Acting Attorney General Alina Habba and DHS Special Agent Ricky Patel for false arrest, malicious prosecution, and defamation following the dismissal of trespassing charges. The suit alleges Baraka was invited onto the property but was violently arrested and detained for over five hours, with Patel allegedly encouraging the arrest. Habba’s subsequent public statements about the arrest are cited as defamatory, while the judge’s dismissal of the charges highlighted Habba’s “worrisome misstep” and disregard for due process. The lawsuit contends Habba acted to advance a political agenda, rather than impartially applying the law.

Read More