Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield’s recent decision to abandon its controversial anesthesia cap policy highlights the potent impact of public outcry and the fragility of seemingly entrenched corporate practices. The company’s swift reversal, attributed to “widespread misinformation,” suggests a hasty decision-making process and a perhaps overly optimistic assessment of public reaction.
The sheer speed of the policy’s retraction is remarkable. From announcement to cancellation, the timeline was incredibly short, implying a significant internal reevaluation spurred by intense public backlash. This suggests that the initial policy lacked sufficient foresight and consideration for the potential consequences, possibly underestimating the widespread reliance on anesthesia services and the financial burden an arbitrary time limit would impose.… Continue reading
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield reversed a new policy that would have limited anesthesia reimbursements based on insurer-set time limits, following significant backlash. The policy, initially implemented in Connecticut, New York, and Missouri, sparked outrage from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and intervention from state officials. Anthem cited efforts to curb overbilling, intending to utilize CMS Physical Work Time values for reimbursement calculations, a methodology heavily criticized for its lack of transparency and established precedent. The reversal came after public outcry and pressure from state governors and officials in Connecticut and New York.
Read More
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield’s policy to limit anesthesia coverage based on procedure time, impacting patients in Connecticut, New York, and Missouri, has been reversed. The policy would have denied payment for anesthesia exceeding pre-determined time limits, potentially leaving patients with substantial out-of-pocket costs. This decision drew swift criticism for potentially increasing patient debt and prioritizing corporate profits. While Anthem offered claim dispute options, the ASA advised affected individuals to contact their state insurance commissioner or legislator.
Read More
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield’s recent announcement regarding anesthesia coverage is sparking outrage. The company has declared it will no longer pay for anesthesia care exceeding an arbitrary time limit, regardless of the surgical procedure’s actual duration. This means that if a surgery takes longer than anticipated due to complications, patients will be left with unexpected and substantial bills for the extended anesthesia time.
This policy change is not only financially devastating for patients but also ethically questionable. It creates a system where patients are vulnerable to unforeseen medical expenses, particularly during stressful and complex surgical procedures. The decision to cap anesthesia coverage based on an arbitrary time limit ignores the unpredictable nature of surgery and the potential for unforeseen complications.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker