That time Trump said we captured the airports during the Revolutionary War sticks out vividly in my mind, not just as a moment of absurdity but as a profound testament to how historical narratives can be warped or misunderstood in broader public discourse. As a nation built on the principles of curiosity and inquiry, the statement felt jarring, like a stumble on level ground. Airports? In the 18th century? It’s a fascinating thought that leads one to reflect on the interplay between history, rhetoric, and the absurdities that can sometimes dominate our conversations.
In this remarkable era of tweet-sized impressions, the blurring of fact and fiction seems almost commonplace, yet it’s crucial to deliberate the implications of such declarations.… Continue reading
The recent comments made by the Heritage Foundation have sparked outrage and concern amongst many people, including myself. The notion of a ‘bloodless’ revolution being promoted by this organization is not only dangerous but also deeply troubling. It is clear that the Heritage Foundation is advocating for a radical shift in our society, one that could strip away the rights and freedoms that so many have fought for.
The fact that this group is openly discussing the idea of a Second American Revolution, with the goal of establishing a nepotistic monarchy, is alarming to say the least. The potential consequences of such a revolution could be catastrophic, leading to the oppression and marginalization of many vulnerable groups within our society.… Continue reading
As I read through the disturbing quotes and commentary regarding the man behind Project 2025 and his brazen statements about a second American Revolution, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of unease and anger. The fact that someone in a position of power and influence can openly talk about revolution and potential violence without facing immediate repercussions is alarming.
The language used, such as “we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be,” is not just a political statement but a veiled threat. It echoes the rhetoric of abusers and dictators, laying out a sinister ultimatum that implies compliance or the unleashing of violence.… Continue reading
Neanderthals, our distant relatives who lived 75,000 years ago, seem to have been quite sophisticated beings. They buried their dead, had flutes, and even enjoyed BBQ. It’s fascinating to think about the similarities and differences between us and these ancient beings. One key aspect that sets Neanderthals apart from modern humans is their unique facial structure. Their bone cells continued to grow as they aged, resulting in distinctive chin and brow ridges, as well as larger eye sockets compared to us Homo sapiens.
The recent revelation of a Neanderthal woman’s face brings up a plethora of questions and musings. I can’t help but wonder about what her life was like, what her culture was, and whether Neanderthals had characteristics like blonde hair.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker