Thousands gathered across the country on President’s Day to voice their opposition to Donald Trump, openly labeling him a tyrant. The scale of the demonstrations surprised many, with reports indicating far more participation than initially anticipated. While some accounts described “hundreds” in smaller towns, even within conservative areas, many other cities saw thousands of protestors. This widespread participation suggests a significant level of discontent aimed at the former president.
The sheer number of people involved underlines the intensity of feeling against Trump. Some felt that the use of “thousands” to describe the turnout actually understated the widespread nature of the protests, with several locations reporting significantly larger crowds.… Continue reading
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. Submissions can be made through a designated online portal. The process is designed to be straightforward and confidential. All submissions are reviewed by the editorial team. This allows The Daily Beast to continue delivering impactful journalism based on credible information.
Read More
Don’t Be Fooled, ‘Trump Is a Weak President’
The notion that Donald Trump is a weak president is a dangerous misconception. While his public persona might project strength, a closer examination reveals a disturbing reality: his weakness is precisely what makes him so effective at dismantling democratic institutions. The idea of him as a “weak arsonist” is profoundly misleading; arson is not weak, it’s destructive, and his actions, however incompetent they might appear, achieve exactly that.
Destroying is indeed far easier than building, and Trump’s presidency is a masterclass in controlled demolition. He operates not through skillful governance, but through a calculated disregard for established norms and processes.… Continue reading
Despite numerous controversial actions including unqualified Cabinet nominations, granting access to sensitive information to unqualified individuals, and threatening war crimes, President Trump maintains a 50% approval rating. This suggests a lack of widespread public outrage, though this may change as the consequences of his actions become more apparent. However, Democrats must be proactive rather than passively waiting for public opinion to shift, mirroring the Republican strategy of actively shaping public perception. A more assertive Democratic approach is crucial given the gravity of Trump’s plans.
Read More
Ilhan Omar’s pointed response to a Texas lawmaker’s call for her deportation has sparked a considerable amount of online conversation. The congresswoman’s use of the term “dumbass” to describe the lawmaker, while blunt, reflects a widespread sentiment among many who view the request as absurd. It underscores the fundamental misunderstanding, or perhaps willful disregard, of the legal realities surrounding citizenship and deportation.
The act of calling for the deportation of a sitting member of Congress, a naturalized US citizen, is inherently problematic. It speaks to a lack of understanding of basic civic processes, and raises serious concerns about the motives behind such a call.… Continue reading
The Democratic party’s response to the Trump administration has been marked by internal conflict and ineffective strategies. Their approach has vacillated between condemning Trump’s actions and cooperating with his agenda, resulting in a perceived lack of power to shape political discourse. This passivity, coupled with a failure to adapt to the current information environment, has left the Democrats appearing weak and out of touch with the public. The article concludes that the party needs to rediscover its core values and engage in principled opposition to regain its standing.
Read More
Several controversial Trump nominees, including Pete Hegseth for Department of Defense and Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, exemplify a pattern of prioritizing loyalty over qualifications. While some nominees might face setbacks due to scandals (e.g., sexual misconduct allegations), their replacements are likely to be equally extreme ideologically. This pattern extends to other choices like Linda McMahon for education secretary and Brendan Carr for the FCC, highlighting a disregard for traditional governance norms. Finally, Tom Homan’s appointment as border czar underscores this trend with his aggressive immigration enforcement plans.
Read More
David Axelrod’s assessment that Donald Trump learned during his previous term that he could “get away with anything” rings profoundly true. It’s a chilling realization, but one supported by a multitude of observations from the past several years. His actions, or rather, his lack of consequences for his actions, suggest a deeply ingrained belief that the rules simply don’t apply to him.
This wasn’t a sudden realization born from his time in office; it’s more accurately described as a confirmation of a pre-existing belief. His past behaviors, even before his presidential campaign, displayed a consistent pattern of disregard for norms and conventions.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s return to power marks a pivotal moment requiring unwavering commitment to factual reporting. HuffPost remains dedicated to delivering critical news coverage of the new administration, ensuring transparency and accountability. This vital mission necessitates public support to maintain free and accessible journalism. Contributions of any size directly impact HuffPost’s ability to continue this crucial work. The organization urges readers to help safeguard independent news reporting.
Read More
The Constitution page on the White House website displaying a 404 error is a significant event, sparking considerable online discussion and speculation. The sheer fact that the document outlining the very foundation of the American government is inaccessible from its official government website is undeniably unsettling. It immediately raises questions about the nature of the error, whether it’s accidental or deliberate, and what the implications might be.
This seemingly simple technical issue has quickly evolved into a symbol of broader anxieties and interpretations. Many are convinced this is no accident. The suggestion that this is a deliberate act underscores deep-seated concerns about potential efforts to undermine democratic institutions and principles.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker