The author argues that since Donald Trump assumed office in 2025, the United States has been systematically dismantling democratic principles through a barrage of executive orders, mirroring historical patterns of authoritarianism. Trump, portrayed as a figurehead for Project 2025 and right-wing Christian Nationalism, is seen as a puppet controlled by others who prioritize personal gain. Congressional inaction, fueled by a Republican majority, allows Trump to disregard constitutional law, with Texas’s efforts to gerrymander seats highlighting a dictatorial takeover. The author draws parallels between Trump’s actions and those of Hitler, warning that the suppression of rights and freedoms, along with the establishment of detention centers, are eroding American values and instilling fear.
Read More
The former president expressed a desire to intervene in Chicago’s issues by deploying the National Guard, asserting his authority as president to do so. He stated that he would have “much more respect” for the governor if he was called to assist. However, the current governor has rebuffed the offer, declaring the former president is “neither wanted here, nor needed here,” and further criticizing his remarks. These statements follow a pattern of undermining checks and balances and using crime statistics to justify intervention in Democrat-led cities.
Read More
The article examines the perplexing disconnect between American voters’ expressed preferences for policies like universal healthcare and infrastructure and their support for politicians who actively oppose these measures. Three theories are proposed: the “ignorance theory,” which suggests voters are unaware of candidates’ stances; the “Svengali theory,” blaming media propaganda for brainwashing voters; and the “politics-as-entertainment theory,” arguing that voters are more engaged with political spectacle than policy substance. Ultimately, the author posits a “this-is-who-we-are” theory, suggesting that voters may consciously support policies and politicians reflecting their values, even if those values conflict with their material interests, and that American democracy may be faltering as a result.
Read More
Donald Trump’s approval rating drops in latest poll, and it’s hard to ignore the collective sigh that seems to accompany each new release. The reaction isn’t exactly one of surprise, is it? It feels like a familiar headline, a recurring theme in the current political climate. Many see this as a sign of Americans “sobering up,” a phrase that speaks volumes about the frustrations and concerns surrounding his actions.
The numbers themselves tell a pretty stark story. The poll indicates a significant gap between those who strongly disapprove of his performance and those who strongly approve. One poll showed that nearly half of the respondents strongly disapprove, with a much smaller fraction strongly approving.… Continue reading
The “NewsNight” panel engaged in a heated debate over Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison interview, with panelists disagreeing on its value. Ferguson argued that the interview should be taken seriously because it could provide new information, while others questioned Maxwell’s trustworthiness given her denial of guilt. Panelist Rangappa pointed out the contradiction in believing Maxwell, given her dishonesty, leading to a memorable exchange. Ultimately, the discussion highlighted differing perspectives on the validity of information from a convicted sex trafficker.
Read More
A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals widespread concern about the state of democracy in the United States, with 57% of Americans fearing for its future. Partisan redistricting, specifically gerrymandering, is a significant point of contention, with a majority believing it is detrimental to democracy. The poll highlights deep distrust between Democrats and Republicans, yet also reveals unease with redistricting practices on both sides. As a result of this, states like Texas, where Republicans are redrawing maps, and California, where Democrats plan to do the same, are moving to redraw districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Read More
During a photo opportunity at Union Station, JD Vance and other officials were met with boos and chants from protesters. While handing out food to National Guard troops deployed by Donald Trump, Vance stated their efforts brought “law and order” to the area, as demonstrators protested outside, chanting phrases like “Free DC!”. Vance addressed the protestors by saying they were out protesting policies that keep people safe. The deployment of troops, claiming to address rising crime, comes despite a falling crime rate and the federalization of the city’s Metropolitan police department.
Read More
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has authorized the deployment of 150 Ohio National Guard members to Washington D.C. to support the D.C. National Guard. This action follows a request from the Secretary of the Army, and the Ohio National Guard members will conduct presence patrols and augment security. The deployment is part of a broader trend as other Republican-led states also send troops to the nation’s capital, driven by President Trump’s efforts to increase federal control over policing in D.C.
Read More
Texas’s plan to add five Republican congressional seats is currently stalled due to a continued walkout by state House Democrats. This situation reflects a broader national trend, as other states face unprecedented mid-decade redistricting efforts. Representative Jim Clyburn has spoken out regarding these efforts and the potential threat to his South Carolina seat. This push could significantly reshape the political landscape.
Read More
The article explores the concerning resurgence of views questioning women’s right to vote, highlighted by a prominent figure’s endorsement of a video advocating for household voting where men often cast the ballot. This stance is connected to Christian reconstructionism, an extreme ideology that restricts women’s political participation. While direct attempts to overturn the 19th Amendment are unlikely, the article points out how conservative strategies, such as voter ID laws and restrictions on voting access, could disproportionately affect women and undermine their ability to vote. Experts warn against dismissing this as fringe, noting the potential for erosion of women’s rights through incremental legislative actions. The piece concludes by emphasizing the importance of women’s voting power in the political landscape.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood