Freeze US trade deal over Trump Greenland threats, EU lawmaker urges | Euractiv is a subject that immediately raises flags. The core of the matter seems to be a significant level of concern and frankly, outright alarm, about the current political climate in the United States and the potential implications for international relations, specifically trade. The central argument posits that the EU should not only freeze ongoing trade negotiations but potentially halt all trade with the US, driven by a perception of an increasingly hostile and unpredictable American government.
The primary catalyst for this sentiment is the behavior of the US administration, and more specifically, the administration’s perceived threats, or at the very least, inappropriate attempts at coercion concerning Greenland.… Continue reading
The White House has confirmed that President Trump is actively discussing the potential purchase of Greenland, a territory of Denmark. This follows concerns over Greenland’s strategic importance for early warning systems and natural resources, especially considering its location between North America and the Arctic. While all options are considered, diplomacy is prioritized, according to the White House. This move comes after Trump’s previous attempt to buy the island in 2019, which was rejected, and amid international discussions and concerns regarding the use of military force.
Read More
EU Council President Antonio Costa recently affirmed the European Union’s support for Greenland and Denmark, emphasizing that decisions regarding Greenland’s future must involve its people. Costa’s statement was made in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, which Trump views as crucial for U.S. military strategy. Highlighting the importance of international law, Costa asserted that the EU would not tolerate violations regardless of the location. He further underscored the EU’s commitment to upholding international law and multilateralism.
Read More
Norwegian leaders have voiced strong support for Denmark in response to US President Trump’s threats to annex Greenland. These leaders, including the Foreign Minister and Prime Minister, have condemned Trump’s actions as a violation of international law and the NATO pact, while expressing solidarity with Denmark. They emphasized Greenland’s status as part of the Kingdom of Denmark and the importance of respecting international rules. Trump’s assertions regarding the need for US control, likely motivated by Greenland’s resources, have been met with resistance from both Danish and Norwegian officials.
Read More
France: working with allies on plan should US make move on Greenland, the core of this unsettling scenario, underscores a disturbing shift in global dynamics. The very premise—that the United States might contemplate, let alone execute, a move on Greenland—is a stark indicator of a potential fracturing of the established world order. This isn’t just about geopolitics; it’s about trust, alliances, and the foundational principles of international relations. The gravity of such a hypothetical situation demands careful consideration and strategic planning, and France, with its historical role in international affairs and its deep commitment to European stability, would undoubtedly be at the forefront of crafting a response.… Continue reading
In response to U.S. interest in annexing Greenland, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Governor-General Mary Simon and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand will visit the territory in February. The visit aims to reinforce support for Denmark’s sovereignty, as U.S. officials, including Donald Trump, have expressed interest in Greenland for national security and its mineral wealth. Carney also addressed concerns about Trump’s plans to increase Venezuelan oil production, stating that Canadian oil would remain competitive due to its low-risk profile and falling production costs. Furthermore, Carney downplayed the potential impact of Venezuelan oil on Canadian producers.
Read More
The Danish army maintains a standing rule of engagement, established in 1952, that mandates soldiers to immediately counter-attack any invading forces, including those from the United States, without waiting for orders. This directive, confirmed by the Danish defence ministry, remains in effect. The rule’s reaffirmation comes amid President Donald Trump’s repeated expressions of interest in annexing Greenland, even suggesting the use of military force. These statements have caused significant shock and consternation in Denmark, Greenland, and the broader NATO alliance.
Read More
In response to heightened concerns regarding Greenland, Senator Ruben Gallego announced a resolution aimed at preventing a potential invasion by former President Donald Trump. Gallego’s resolution comes amidst Trump’s statements, including a recent interview, indicating the strategic importance of Greenland for U.S. defense. The senator’s action directly counters Trump’s rhetoric, which has fueled speculation about the United States’ interest in the self-governing Danish territory. Furthermore, Gallego introduced an amendment to the Senate Defense Appropriations bill to prohibit the use of funds for military force against Greenland.
Read More
The White House has revealed it is discussing various options for acquiring Greenland, a semi-autonomous region of Denmark, citing national security concerns. These options include potentially utilizing the U.S. military. This has prompted strong reactions, including a joint statement of support for Denmark from several European allies who expressed their commitment to respecting Greenland’s territorial integrity. Furthermore, US officials have also discussed the possibility of purchasing the island or establishing a “Compact of Free Association.” These discussions have sparked debate over Greenland’s future and its relationship with the U.S. and Denmark.
Read More
European allies working on a plan should the US move on Greenland is becoming a chillingly realistic scenario, prompting a flurry of discussion and, hopefully, concrete action. The very idea of the United States considering a military move against a fellow NATO member, even if it’s Greenland (under Danish sovereignty), is a sign of a world order teetering on the edge. The gravity of such a potential act is driving European nations to seriously consider how they would respond.
One of the first concerns that pops into mind is the potential impact on US military bases across Europe. If the US were to take military action against Greenland, it seems perfectly reasonable to assume that some European nations would be forced to reconsider the presence of US military bases within their borders.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker