The article posits a clash between “end-of-the-world fascism” (EWF) and civil disobedience, with EWF currently holding the advantage due to its control over resources and political structures. EWF thrives on violence and maintains power through manipulation of corporate interests and the exploitation of the working class. Resistance faces challenges, including fragmented social classes and the co-option of political movements by corporate agendas within the Republican and Democratic parties. Ultimately, the article urges a shift in perspective, suggesting that the impending end of food assistance programs presents an opportunity for the educated professional class to unite with the abandoned working class and engage in mass protest.
Read More
A Department of Homeland Security promotional video featuring Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino in a black trench coat has drawn comparisons to Nazi imagery due to the styling of the video. The video, released the same day Bovino was ordered to appear in court, features the commander in a stylized black-and-white portrayal and has led to accusations of fascism and authoritarianism, including from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The video’s release occurred amidst a backdrop of increasing scrutiny of DHS tactics, including those around protests and aggressive deportation goals. The DHS has not responded to questions regarding the video’s production or its potential connection to Nazi symbolism.
Read More
The No Kings Day festivities, attracting a large crowd, highlighted the need for a unified grassroots movement rather than a Democratic Party-focused spectacle. The article criticizes the event’s emphasis on speeches from Democratic Party figures and calls for a shift towards civil disobedience and a broader coalition. The author suggests three key tasks for the movement: preventing Democratic Party control, expanding the coalition to include marginalized groups, and transitioning from protest to acts of civil disobedience. Ultimately, the author believes No Kings Day must evolve beyond mere political platitudes and embrace a more expansive vision to effectively counter the growing threat of fascism.
Read More
The upcoming “No Kings” protests are expected to be large, sparking accusations from prominent Republicans who claim the demonstrations are fueled by “antifa” and “Soros-paid protestors.” Organizers, including Indivisible and the American Federation of Teachers, dismiss these claims, emphasizing their focus on peaceful assembly and citizen participation. They highlight the diverse composition of their groups and the efforts made in de-escalation training and community care. Ultimately, the organizers believe the criticism is an attempt to undermine the right to protest against a government that they view as overreaching and undemocratic.
Read More
Anthony Nicodemo, a high school basketball coach and social studies teacher, has faced significant hate since coming out, even requiring security at his games. However, a recent video of him displaying a sign in his classroom led to a surge of online hostility after it was reposted by right-wing influencers. This caused Nicodemo to temporarily go private on social media for the first time in over a decade. He explained the online attacks felt different and more emboldened than in the past, a sentiment that made him fearful for other members of the LGBTQ+ community. Despite the backlash, Nicodemo eventually resumed his work as an advocate for inclusion, emphasizing the importance of speaking the truth in the face of misinformation.
Read More
Leaked messages from Young Republican leaders, revealed by Politico, unveil the disturbing reality of their private communications. The “RESTOREYR WAR ROOM” chat, encompassing thousands of messages, exposed participants calling opponents derogatory names, celebrating gas chambers, and making light of rape fantasies. These individuals, holding positions within the party structure, engaged in casual sadism, racism, and homophobia. While the public response has been swift, with dismissals and condemnations, the leaked logs expose the underlying cruelty and racial animus within the younger generation of Republican leaders.
Read More
The Democratic strategy should focus on highlighting the consequences of the government shutdown, emphasizing both job cuts and the controversial figure of Vought. Democrats should draw parallels to the unpopular DOGE initiative, emphasizing the potentially more devastating impact of the shutdown on federal employees, with an estimated 750,000 being furloughed. Furthermore, it is crucial to educate Americans about Vought’s Christian nationalist ideology and views, which are considered un-American due to their potential violation of constitutional principles, particularly the separation of church and state.
Read More
Stephen Miller, a key figure in shaping the Trump administration’s agenda, frequently frames American politics as a battle against “leftwing terrorism,” accusing Democrats, judges, and the media of shielding such threats. This rhetoric, as seen in Miller’s response to an unfavorable judicial ruling, reflects a broader pattern of labeling any opposition to Trump as illegitimate. Miller and Trump view dissent as a form of rebellion, utilizing events like the murder of Charlie Kirk or protests against ICE to justify the use of state power to suppress their political opponents. This strategy underscores a post-liberal approach that rejects neutral standards of conduct, justifying Trump’s actions while deeming any opposition as evil.
Read More
Following a post from Governor Newsom’s press office labeling Stephen Miller a “fascist,” Republican Representative Derrick Francis Van Orden called for Newsom’s arrest, deeming the post “domestic terrorism” based on 18 U.S. Code § 2331. Van Orden’s critique cited the post’s alleged intent to influence government policy through intimidation. Ironically, the term “fascist” has been used by Miller himself to describe opponents and the Democratic party. Newsom’s office, however, has remained unyielding in its criticism.
Read More
The memorandum, issued by Trump, systematically redefines political opposition as terrorism. It weaponizes federal law enforcement by targeting groups and individuals who disagree with the administration’s stance on various social and political issues. The document orders the IRS to strip tax-exempt status from progressive non-profits and refer them for prosecution, while ignoring right-wing extremist violence. Ultimately, this memorandum transforms ideological disagreement into grounds for investigation, prosecution, and financial ruin, indicating a shift toward authoritarian practices.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker