So, about those “Don’t Tread on Me” folks and the whole Walz/National Guard situation… it seems the core sentiment here is a pretty cynical one. The general consensus, if you can call it that, is that the rallying cry of “Don’t Tread on Me” has always been, at best, a highly selective sentiment.
The initial reaction seems to be a resounding “Where are they, indeed?” The implication is that these folks, who once waved the Gadsden flag with such fervor, are mysteriously absent when the metaphorical boots start marching on other people. It’s not hard to see why. The comments paint a picture of a group primarily concerned with their own self-interests, or perhaps the interests of a very specific in-group.… Continue reading
In an ironic twist, the British government’s attempts to appease Donald Trump have inadvertently placed King Charles at the center of the Epstein scandal. MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell highlights this connection, drawing attention to a dinner where Trump was present, amidst allegations of inappropriate relationships. The article emphasizes the king’s presence at a table, where Trump was also seated, implicating them both in the scandal. Former Ambassador Peter Mandelson and Prince Andrew were notably absent from the conversation.
Read More
The Plan to Turn Charlie Kirk’s Murder Into a Left-Wing Crackdown focuses on the immediate aftermath of the assassination, it’s clear that the narrative being pushed is designed to exploit the tragedy for political gain. The circumstances of the actual event, the details of the killing itself, quickly become secondary to a predetermined agenda.
This is not just about a “left-wing” crackdown, despite the efforts to frame it that way. It’s broader, targeting anyone who doesn’t align with a specific ideology. This type of framing has historical parallels, such as the Reichstag fire, where a pivotal event was used to justify an authoritarian power grab.… Continue reading
Trump says flag burners should be jailed, and Pride flags banned, and this declaration is just the latest volley in a barrage of Republican rhetoric aimed at stifling dissent. It’s a chilling prospect, particularly in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, which has seemingly become a catalyst for the party’s escalating crackdown on free speech. The situation feels like a descent into authoritarianism, where opposing viewpoints are not merely disagreed with but actively suppressed.
The former president’s pronouncements, made during a press conference on the assassination, are not isolated incidents. They are part of a broader trend. This push for restrictions on what people can say or display, under the guise of maintaining order or protecting sensibilities, is a dangerous game that undercuts the very foundations of a democratic society.… Continue reading
This publication is dedicated to delivering unbiased, factual journalism and holding power accountable, thanks to the support of its members. Initial support helped strengthen the newsroom, particularly during challenging periods. However, continued operation requires further assistance from readers, and the organization is requesting that individuals become members to help sustain its reporting efforts. The publication expresses sincere gratitude for past support and hopes for continued backing to continue its mission.
Read More
During a recent interview, the president responded to a question about free speech and his ally Pam Bondi’s stance on hate speech. He criticized the reporter’s perceived unfair treatment, accusing them of harboring hate. The president went on to claim he desired fairness while simultaneously blaming the “radical left” for the country’s problems. This exchange highlighted the president’s sensitivity to criticism and his tendency to deflect blame.
Read More
In response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, senior Trump administration officials have announced intentions to target a nonexistent left-wing “domestic terror movement.” These officials, including Stephen Miller and JD Vance, stated plans to identify and dismantle organizations allegedly supporting violence against conservatives. Critics argue this is a manipulative tactic to advance an authoritarian agenda, potentially suppressing dissent and ignoring right-wing violence, which statistically outpaces left-wing attacks. Democratic figures like Congresswoman Diana DeGette and Governor Gavin Newsom have condemned the administration’s actions, viewing them as an exploitation of tragedy to undermine democratic institutions.
Read More
The author concludes that American democracy is in a precarious position, facing significant threats. They argue that Democrats have approximately 400 days to regain control of the House of Representatives in the midterm elections, serving as a check on potential presidential overreach. The author emphasizes the urgency due to factors like excessive executive power, gerrymandering, endemic violence, and the exploitation of capitalist competition. Success hinges on focusing on economic issues to sway voters and ensuring free and fair elections, as the upcoming midterms are crucial for the survival of US democracy.
Read More
The right laughs at trans people’s deaths but demands people be sad over Charlie Kirk. This stark contrast, this blatant hypocrisy, reveals a chilling truth: a hierarchy of the value of people’s lives is intrinsic to the authoritarian project. The Republican Party, wielding its power, is actively trying to enforce this hierarchy on everyone. They want us to comply, to accept their warped worldview where some lives are inherently worth more than others.
This insidious agenda manifests in various ways. We see it in the gleeful reactions to the deaths of trans individuals, often accompanied by dehumanizing language and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes.… Continue reading
On Charlie Kirk Show, JD Vance Talks of Crackdown on Liberal Groups
It’s hard to ignore the implications of JD Vance’s words on Charlie Kirk’s show. The very suggestion of a crackdown on liberal groups, framed in the context of political events, sets off a lot of alarm bells. It’s impossible not to see echoes of historical authoritarian tactics here, and the idea of the state machinery being used to silence dissent is a dangerous one. The fact that this is being openly discussed by someone in a position of power, like a Vice President, makes it even more concerning. You start to wonder, what exactly does “crackdown” mean in this context?… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker