The planet is rapidly changing due to climate change, yet the current president, Donald Trump, appears to be living in a past era, prioritizing fossil fuels and tariffs over green energy and global cooperation. His actions, such as rejecting climate science and supporting the oil industry, align with China’s advancements in green energy, potentially ceding economic and environmental leadership. Trump’s policies are also pushing the U.S. to the “planetary margins” and may lead to a historical disaster due to his disregard for the environment. Ultimately, Trump’s presidency is marked by a backward-looking vision that threatens the future of the country and the planet.
Read More
Independent journalism faces unprecedented threats, underscoring its vital role in safeguarding democracy. Generous donors are tripling all monthly donations, so a $15 gift is worth $45. Support non-commercial news outlets by donating today and help protect freedom of speech, which is essential for a democratic society. Every contribution makes a difference.
Read More
Federal immigration enforcement in Chicago has increased with armed agents patrolling the city, and Trump plans to deploy 100 military troops to Illinois. Governor Pritzker has questioned the actions of federal agents and is prepared for a fight against Trump’s federal interventions, which also target cities like Baltimore and Memphis. Trump’s actions are seen as a federal takeover, which has resulted in the Governor’s stance against stripping power and state sovereignty. Resistance to the president’s actions will require state leaders, local leaders, businesses, and neighbors to work together.
Read More
Senate Democrat on Trump sending troops to Portland: ‘Stay the hell out’
So, it seems like a Senate Democrat, and really, who can blame them, is sending a very clear message to the former president: “Stay the hell out.” The situation in Portland, with federal troops deployed, is understandably raising a lot of red flags. The core of the concern is pretty obvious: why are federal troops being sent into a city, and what’s the justification? It’s hard to shake the feeling that something about this just isn’t right.
The GOP, supposedly the party of small government, seems to be embracing the idea of martial law.… Continue reading
The President is escalating tensions by threatening military occupation in Portland, Oregon, framing protesters as “domestic terrorists” despite their constitutional rights to protest ICE tactics. This move, coupled with the deployment of a Joint Terrorism Task Force in Illinois, suggests an intent to use anti-sedition laws against those opposing the administration’s policies. Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller is leading this effort, targeting prominent Democrats and potentially organizations like Open Society Foundations. The administration’s actions reflect a broader pattern of retribution, with investigations targeting Trump’s perceived enemies and a willingness to use legal means to silence dissent.
Read More
President Trump, in a Truth Social post, directed the Secretary of Defense to deploy troops to Portland, Oregon, escalating his use of military deployments in US cities, despite legal challenges. This follows deployments to Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and Memphis, with local officials condemning the actions as provocative and unauthorized. Trump’s authority to deploy troops is legally dubious, violating the Posse Comitatus Act and facing legal setbacks, as a federal judge has already ruled against a similar deployment to Los Angeles. Civil liberties experts warn that Trump’s actions, including designating “Antifa” as a domestic terrorism organization, could be used to suppress progressive groups and pose a significant threat to American democracy.
Read More
President Trump announced on Saturday the deployment of troops to Portland, Oregon, citing the city as “war ravaged” and intending to protect ICE detention facilities, a directive made to the Department of War. This announcement followed a deadly attack at a detention facility in Dallas, which federal authorities said was carried out by a gunman seeking to terrorize ICE workers. Local officials, however, dispute the president’s claims of unsafety and have not been informed of a military mission, requesting residents to remain calm. The Pentagon has yet to issue a deployment order, but the chief Pentagon spokesman stated the department is ready to mobilize personnel in support of DHS operations.
Read More
The article discusses the potential for the Trump administration to implement a crackdown on dissent, using the death of Charlie Kirk as a catalyst. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, and the subsequent executive order designating “antifa” as a domestic terrorist organization, provides a framework for increased surveillance and suppression of leftist groups. This action, informed by loose FBI guidelines and a preventative approach to counterterrorism, mirrors existing FBI powers and could lead to the misuse of federal law enforcement resources against groups and individuals across the left. This move represents an escalation of tactics that has been developing for over 100 years, and could be uniquely concerning and authoritarian.
Read More
The memorandum, issued by Trump, systematically redefines political opposition as terrorism. It weaponizes federal law enforcement by targeting groups and individuals who disagree with the administration’s stance on various social and political issues. The document orders the IRS to strip tax-exempt status from progressive non-profits and refer them for prosecution, while ignoring right-wing extremist violence. Ultimately, this memorandum transforms ideological disagreement into grounds for investigation, prosecution, and financial ruin, indicating a shift toward authoritarian practices.
Read More
North Korean authorities are intensifying crackdowns on young people, specifically targeting expressions of love deemed indicative of “decadent lifestyles.” An incident involving a love letter discovered during a factory inspection led to a public struggle session where the writer was condemned for using romantic phrases like “I love you.” Officials view this as a violation of laws against foreign influence, as they routinely inspect electronic devices for consumption of foreign media. This event highlights the regime’s efforts to control personal expression and suppress any perceived challenge to its ideology, sparking public criticism and disbelief.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood