House Democrat eyes articles of impeachment against Hegseth, and the prospect is causing quite a stir, wouldn’t you say? It’s a move that’s bound to ignite a firestorm of debate, even if the eventual outcome seems predictable. The core of this discussion centers on the idea of holding individuals accountable, specifically concerning alleged war crimes and other serious offenses.
The motivation behind such a push, at least from this perspective, appears to be about forcing Republicans to publicly declare their stance. The idea is to put them on the record: are they okay with the conduct in question? It’s a strategy aimed at exposing what’s perceived as the GOP’s true colors, their values, and their priorities.… Continue reading
In his book, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth describes instructing troops to ignore legal advice regarding the rules of engagement in Iraq, emphasizing a need to destroy threats without restrictions. He also criticized constraints placed on soldiers and expressed admiration for commanders who encouraged aggressive actions. This stance, along with his role in pardoning or supporting soldiers accused of war crimes, has drawn scrutiny, particularly in light of an incident where he allegedly ordered the killing of all survivors in a Caribbean drug boat incident. Experts like David Crane have criticized Hegseth’s views, emphasizing the importance of following the rules of engagement and the negative impact of such actions on military professionalism.
Read More
The article criticizes the current Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, highlighting his perceived disrespect for the military and lack of qualifications for the role. It accuses Hegseth of potentially ordering a “no quarter” order, a war crime, and mocks the severity of the accusations with juvenile social media posts. Despite his incompetence, Hegseth’s position allows him to make decisions that put lives at risk. The author argues that Hegseth is unfit for his position and should be removed, as his actions demonstrate contempt for the military and a lack of understanding of his responsibilities.
Read More
Alon Ohel, a recently released hostage, has come forward with accounts of sexual abuse during his captivity in Gaza, becoming the third former hostage to publicly reveal such treatment. The abuse, which began after Ohel was left alone, included manipulation of food rations and sexual harassment. His account, along with those of Guy Gilboa Dalal and Rom Braslavski, details graphic incidents of assault and humiliation endured during their captivity. These survivors’ testimonies underscore the severe brutality and psychological trauma inflicted upon the hostages.
Read More
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is facing scrutiny for a double-tap strike in the Caribbean that resulted in the death of survivors from an initial boat attack. Multiple legal experts and lawmakers suggest that Hegseth’s order to “kill everybody” could lead to investigations for war crimes or murder, as the Pentagon’s Law of War Manual prohibits targeting those who are incapacitated. The attacks, which have resulted in at least 83 civilian deaths, are considered extrajudicial killings, as the targets are suspected drug traffickers. Following the September 2 strike, a government source claimed Hegseth was turning military personnel into “murderers” while the Former JAGs Working Group condemned the actions as war crimes.
Read More
The Post’s account of Bradley’s order for a second strike, allegedly targeting survivors due to their potential to alert traffickers, raises serious legal concerns. Experts argue this rationale violates the laws of war, especially if the live drone feed shows survivors being killed. Crucially, Bradley’s testimony is needed to clarify Hegseth’s orders and explain the events. Furthermore, the push for public release of a Justice Department memo justifying the strikes, which experts deem legally weak, could reveal a potentially flawed legal basis for the actions, including preemptive claims of immunity.
Read More
Pete Hegseth authorized second strike on drug boat, White House confirms, and that’s where we’re starting. It seems the situation has escalated quickly, with the White House confirming Hegseth’s involvement in the decision to strike a boat suspected of carrying drugs. This revelation is significant, especially considering the allegations of war crimes and the murky legal waters surrounding the incident.
The legal implications here are substantial. Remember, the core of the problem stems from the definition of a “clearly illegal order.” The Department of Defense’s own Law of War Manual explicitly states that firing upon the shipwrecked is a textbook example of such an order.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court is currently reviewing cases concerning the power of the President to remove officials from independent agencies. These cases involve disputes over firings from the Library of Congress, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Reserve. One case revolves around a former Library of Congress official who claimed she was part of the legislative branch, making her firing unlawful. The court has allowed some removals to proceed while others remain in question as the court continues to deliberate.
Read More
The White House is now deflecting blame for the killing of survivors from a U.S. military strike in the Caribbean, shifting responsibility from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to Admiral Frank Bradley, who ordered the deaths of survivors. Despite the act being a potential war crime, as defined by the Department of Defense, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt maintains it was legal. The incident involved the destruction of a boat allegedly used for drug smuggling, with President Trump claiming the attack killed “narcoterrorists.” However, there is no evidence of fentanyl being found on the boats, and they were not en route to the U.S.
Read More
The White House confirmed Admiral Frank M. Bradley ordered the second strike on the alleged drug-carrying vessel in the Caribbean, which resulted in the death of two survivors. This confirmation follows reports and allegations that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth commanded military personnel to “kill everybody” on board. While Leavitt stated Bradley was within his authority, the Pentagon’s Law of War Manual prohibits attacking the wounded, sick, or shipwrecked. This incident has led to increased scrutiny, with members of Congress and experts calling for investigations into potential war crimes amidst growing questions about the Trump administration’s lethal campaign.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker
Hegseth Must Go: Calls for Prosecution and Removal Mount
The article criticizes the current Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, highlighting his perceived disrespect for the military and lack of qualifications for the role. It accuses Hegseth of potentially ordering a “no quarter” order, a war crime, and mocks the severity of the accusations with juvenile social media posts. Despite his incompetence, Hegseth’s position allows him to make decisions that put lives at risk. The author argues that Hegseth is unfit for his position and should be removed, as his actions demonstrate contempt for the military and a lack of understanding of his responsibilities.
Read More