Lawmakers were disturbed by the explanation provided regarding the justification for killing two incapacitated men, with the implication that they were still considered threats. The administration maintained that the men were still involved in drug trafficking, thus perpetuating the idea that they were engaged in armed conflict with the U.S. despite being shipwrecked. This rationale contradicts the laws of war, which generally prohibit killing those no longer actively participating in a conflict. The core argument is a dangerous extension of executive power, allowing for summary military execution of civilians in international waters.
Read More
The Trump administration has controversially justified the killing of suspected cocaine smugglers as “unlawful combatants” in an “armed struggle” against the United States, even if they are unarmed and pose no immediate threat. In a specific instance, Adm. Frank M. Bradley ordered a second missile strike on survivors of an initial strike on a drug smuggling boat. According to reports, this second strike was carried out because the survivors had radioed for help and were seen as still “in the fight.” Critics argue the second strike was a war crime, violating the law-of-war rules regarding shipwrecked individuals. This defense reveals the complexities of applying the law of war to a scenario that, according to the article, doesn’t really exist.
Read More
House Democrat announces articles of impeachment against Hegseth – Well, this is certainly a headline that’s generating some reactions! From the sound of things, people are reacting with a mixture of hope, skepticism, and outright cynicism. The core issue appears to be serious allegations, specifically the assertion that Hegseth is a “murdering war criminal” and that he should face legal consequences. The primary focus is clearly on the gravity of the accusations and the potential for accountability.
House Democrat announces articles of impeachment against Hegseth – The legal aspects of the situation are clearly on people’s minds. There’s discussion around whether the actions in question constitute impeachable offenses, a topic that’s being debated.… Continue reading
Military attorneys initially suggested the second strike might be justified if survivors posed a threat. However, the available footage reportedly contradicted this, leaving little room for doubt about the situation. Representative Jim Himes described the killing of the distressed individuals as extremely troubling, emphasizing their inability to continue any mission. While a “kill them all” order was not given, the circumstances surrounding the strike remain highly concerning.
Read More
AP News reports that a Navy admiral testified before lawmakers, denying a “kill them all” order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth concerning a strike near Venezuela. Although there was no direct order for the second attack, lawmakers remain concerned. Investigations are underway regarding the handling of the military operation and whether it violated the law, with Democrats demanding full video footage and records. Pressure on Hegseth mounts as Republicans pledge a thorough review.
Read More
Military struck drug boat in Caribbean 4 times in Sept. 2 attack, says US official: Let’s break this down. The news that the military targeted a boat in the Caribbean and hit it not once, but four times, immediately raises a lot of questions. It’s the kind of headline that grabs your attention and makes you want to dig deeper. The initial reaction is a mix of shock and disbelief. Did they really need to hit it four times? What was on the boat? And why so many strikes?
The use of four strikes suggests more than just an attempt to disable a vessel.… Continue reading
During a Wednesday Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, U.S. senators and Ukrainian Ambassador Olga Stefanishyna discussed Russia’s alleged abduction of Ukrainian children, characterizing it as a form of genocide. The hearing, titled “The Abduction of Ukrainian Children by the Russian Federation,” aimed to investigate claims that Russia has forcibly removed tens of thousands of children since the invasion began. Witnesses reported that the abducted children are subjected to cultural erasure, including name changes and forced assimilation into Russian culture, as part of a strategic effort to eliminate Ukrainian identity. Senators emphasized the need to account for every child and hold perpetrators accountable, as the abductions present a major obstacle to peace negotiations.
Read More
The current administration has been accused of authorizing and carrying out extrajudicial killings, violating the rules of engagement and potentially committing war crimes. Multiple strikes in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean have resulted in at least 83 deaths, targeting individuals not officially at war with the U.S. Despite this, orders have been given to kill all targets, including survivors of initial strikes, directly contradicting both military and international law. American service members are reminded that they have the right and duty to disobey unlawful orders, as the “just following orders” defense has been rejected for over half a century. Ultimately, those carrying out these actions, not the commanders, are the ones at risk of facing court-martials, federal indictments, and imprisonment for their actions.
Read More
Following reports of potentially unlawful airstrikes in the Caribbean, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted a cartoon depicting Franklin the Turtle targeting “narco terrorists,” a move deemed childish and unprofessional. This post was made in the context of increasing scrutiny over the administration’s actions, including allegations of a second strike against survivors, potentially constituting a war crime. Regardless of the legal justifications for the attacks, Hegseth’s post, which also sends a poor message to the military, is deeply inappropriate and offensive. Investigations are being demanded by congressional leaders concerning the legality of the attacks, and the administration has refused to release requested information.
Read More
Pete Hegseth, the US Secretary of Defense, should be charged with murder due to his involvement in strikes on boats in the Caribbean, resulting in the deaths of approximately 83 civilians. Despite claims of a “war” against drug cartels, the article argues that these actions constitute murder, as the victims were unarmed civilians not posing an imminent threat. Even if a war were declared, international laws of war still prohibit the intentional killing of non-combatants, making the attacks war crimes. Hegseth’s alleged order to “kill everybody” after an initial strike and his subsequent statements reinforce the argument that his actions are criminal and warrant prosecution under federal murder statutes.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood