Alien Enemies Act

Trump Admin Admits Deporting US Father to El Salvador Prison: Accidental Kidnapping?

The Trump administration mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man with protected status in the U.S., to a notorious El Salvadoran prison despite a court order halting deportations. The government admits the deportation was an administrative error but argues it cannot be compelled to return him, citing his lack of U.S. custody and inability to force El Salvador’s cooperation. This action occurred under the controversial invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, despite Abrego Garcia being neither Venezuelan nor having a criminal record in the U.S., and despite a judge having previously granted him protected status. The administration’s refusal to repatriate him raises serious questions about the legality and consequences of its actions.

Read More

Court Blocks Trump’s Alien Enemy Act Deportations

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s temporary block on the deportation of Venezuelan men under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA), a 2-1 decision. The majority found the Justice Department failed to demonstrate the existence of a war or invasion justifying the AEA’s use, and also noted concerns over the men’s wrongful identification as gang members. Judge Henderson’s concurrence emphasized the historical military context of “invasion” in the AEA. The ruling is a setback for the Trump administration, which argued the deportations were within presidential powers.

Read More

Trump Denies Signing Alien Enemies Act Proclamation

Donald Trump claims he didn’t sign the Alien Enemies Act proclamation. This assertion, however, directly contradicts official White House documentation clearly stating his signature and approval of the document. The stark contrast between his denial and verifiable evidence raises serious questions about his cognitive abilities, his truthfulness, or perhaps both.

The discrepancy has led to widespread speculation and a range of interpretations. Some suggest that his denial is a calculated move to distance himself from the potentially controversial implications of the proclamation. Others speculate that he genuinely doesn’t remember signing it, implying a serious lapse in memory or cognitive decline. This possibility is further fueled by observations of his increasingly erratic behavior and apparent difficulty comprehending or recalling events.… Continue reading

Trump Denies Signing Proclamation, Sparks Controversy Over Alien Enemies Act

President Trump denied signing the proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport Venezuelan migrants, despite his signature appearing on the document. He attributed the action to others, specifically mentioning Secretary of State Marco Rubio, while simultaneously defending the deportations as necessary to remove criminals. A White House statement later clarified that Trump’s remarks referred to the original 1798 Act, a claim contradicted by his own statements. Judge Boasberg, meanwhile, expressed anger at the administration’s handling of the case and vowed to investigate potential violations of his temporary restraining order.

Read More

Trump Seeks to Bypass Warrants Using 18th-Century Law

Trump’s attempt to utilize the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to permit federal agents to enter homes without warrants represents a deeply troubling development. This obscure 18th-century law, invoked only three times in history—all during major wars—is now being considered as a potential loophole to circumvent fundamental constitutional rights. The act’s wording, allowing its use under a “warrant of a president,” presents a frighteningly broad interpretation of executive power. This interpretation opens the door to presidential authority to order warrantless searches, effectively bypassing the judicial branch’s crucial role in safeguarding individual liberties.

This action directly contradicts the core principles of the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.… Continue reading

Trump Deportations: Fabricated Evidence and Due Process Violations Exposed

The Trump administration deported hundreds of Venezuelan migrants based on flimsy evidence, primarily misinterpretations of their tattoos. ICE agents falsely linked innocuous tattoos—a soccer ball crown, a “I love you” hand gesture, and religious or family-themed imagery—to alleged Tren de Aragua gang membership. Many deportees were asylum seekers fleeing the very gang they were accused of joining, highlighting the arbitrary and unlawful nature of the deportations. This action circumvents due process, relying on the Alien Enemies Act to justify expulsions without judicial oversight, a tactic previously employed and challenged in court. The government’s actions raise serious concerns about the abuse of power and the erosion of immigrants’ constitutional rights.

Read More

ICE Deports Soccer Player: I Love You Sign Mistaken for Gang Symbol

Jerce Reyes Barrios, a Venezuelan professional soccer player and asylum seeker, was deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act despite lacking a criminal record and presenting evidence of political persecution. Immigration officials based their deportation order on a misinterpreted social media photo and a soccer-themed tattoo, alleging gang affiliation with the Tren de Aragua. This deportation occurred despite a federal judge temporarily blocking the use of the Alien Enemies Act for such deportations. His attorney and family have since lost contact with him, leaving his current status unknown.

Read More

Soccer Tattoo Leads to Deportation: US Citizen Sent to El Salvador Prison Without Trial

A man was deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, purportedly due to a soccer logo tattoo, sparking outrage and highlighting concerns about due process and human rights violations. The attorney’s claims paint a disturbing picture of a system seemingly targeting individuals based on superficial characteristics rather than concrete evidence of wrongdoing.

The situation is especially alarming given the destination: CECOT, a mega-prison in El Salvador, described as overwhelmingly overcrowded and lacking in basic humane conditions. This raises serious questions about the ethical implications of deporting individuals to such a facility without a fair trial or any opportunity for legal recourse.… Continue reading

Trump’s Deportations: Hundreds Deported to El Salvador Without US Criminal Records

A recent sworn declaration by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official revealed that a significant number of individuals deported under the Alien Enemies Act during the Trump administration lacked criminal records in the United States. These deportations, often labeled as targeting gang members, involved non-citizens whose alleged gang affiliations were the primary basis for removal. The statement highlights a discrepancy between the stated rationale for the deportations and the actual criminal history of those removed. This finding raises questions about the accuracy of the Trump administration’s claims regarding gang membership and the justification for these deportations.

Read More

Defying Courts: Is US Democracy on the Brink?

President Trump’s proclamation ordering the deportation of Venezuelan nationals under the Alien Enemies Act has been temporarily blocked by federal Judge James Boasberg. This action, however, may already have been defied, as two planes of deportees allegedly landed despite a restraining order. The administration’s actions, potentially in violation of court orders in multiple cases, could constitute contempt of court, creating a constitutional crisis if executive branch enforcement agencies refuse to comply with judicial mandates. This situation highlights the potential limitations of the judiciary’s power to enforce its orders against a president unwilling to comply.

Read More