The Fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, citing the act was improperly invoked. The court determined that Trump’s claims of a “predatory incursion” or “invasion” by the gang did not meet the criteria for using the wartime authority. This ruling, likely to reach the Supreme Court, represents the first appellate court to closely examine the issue. While the court found the notice period compliant, a dissenting judge argued the required seven-day notice did not sufficiently provide due process to unrepresented detainees.
Read More
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to return hundreds of Venezuelan nationals deported to El Salvador’s CECOT prison. The judge ruled that the deportations, conducted under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without individual judicial review, violated due process rights. While the Supreme Court vacated a prior injunction halting the deportations, it affirmed the right to individual habeas corpus petitions. The judge deemed the situation “Kafkaesque,” citing evidence suggesting many detainees lacked gang ties and were imprisoned based on flimsy accusations. The ruling mandates the return of the Venezuelans to the U.S. to challenge their deportations.
Read More
The Supreme Court issued a late-night decision blocking the Trump administration’s imminent deportation of Venezuelan detainees from a Texas facility to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison. The unsigned opinion sharply criticized the administration for misrepresenting facts, providing insufficient notice of removal (only 24 hours), and attempting to circumvent judicial review by transferring detainees to a foreign country where U.S. courts lacked jurisdiction. The Court rejected the administration’s strategy to avoid class-action lawsuits by promising different treatment for named plaintiffs, highlighting its frustration with efforts to evade due process. This decision, while impacting the Fifth Circuit, effectively halts further removals under the Alien Enemies Act nationwide until further judicial review.
Read More
The Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act for deportations, citing insufficient due process for affected immigrants. This ruling stemmed from the administration’s failure to provide adequate notice and opportunity to contest deportation, despite claiming to have addressed previous concerns. Trump, however, has vehemently criticized the decision, claiming the court is obstructing his efforts to deport individuals deemed terrorists, while ignoring the court’s focus on constitutional due process rights. The Court’s action sends the matter back to a lower court for further review.
Read More
President Trump vehemently criticized the Supreme Court’s temporary block on his administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expedite migrant deportations. This followed a 7-2 Supreme Court decision citing insufficient due process afforded to migrants facing deportation. Trump, amplifying a suggestion from an advisor, shared a post proposing the release of “terrorists” near the homes of justices. This action came after the administration ignored a court order to return a deported man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, to the United States. The president’s response underscores his frustration with judicial oversight of his immigration policies.
Read More
The Supreme Court extended a block on the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport individuals, citing insufficient due process afforded to the detainees. The 7-2 decision mandates advance notice and the opportunity to challenge deportation in court, a ruling that angered President Trump, who criticized the Court on social media. While the ruling specifically addresses Venezuelan gang members detained in Texas, similar legal challenges are pending nationwide, potentially halting Trump’s broader deportation efforts. The Supreme Court’s opinion did not address the legality of invoking the Alien Enemies Act itself, leaving that question for lower courts to decide.
Read More
The Supreme Court temporarily blocked President Trump’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan immigrants, citing insufficient notice and due process violations. The justices remanded the case to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals for further review of the act’s legality and the required notice period. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented, arguing against the Court’s intervention. This decision effectively halts all deportations under the act until lower courts and potentially the Supreme Court definitively rule on its legality and procedural requirements.
Read More
The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 to temporarily block the deportation of Venezuelan nationals under the Alien Enemies Act, citing insufficient notice and resources provided by the Trump administration before their removal. The court found the 24-hour notice given before deportation inadequate, mandating a lower court revisit the appropriate notice period. While not addressing the Act’s proper application, the decision grants temporary relief pending the lower court’s determination, acknowledging both national security interests and constitutional due process. Justices Alito and Thomas dissented, questioning the urgency of the situation and criticizing the lower court’s actions.
Read More
Following a Supreme Court setback regarding his administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants, President Trump vehemently criticized the court on Truth Social, claiming that preventing the deportation of alleged criminals would destroy the nation. He sought Supreme Court approval for the deportation of nearly 200 Venezuelan migrants detained in Texas, referring to them as “murderers” and “criminals.” Public opinion on Trump’s immigration policies remains divided, with recent polls showing fluctuating levels of approval. The Supreme Court is also set to hear arguments on Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship.
Read More
During a Senate hearing, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem defended the Trump administration’s deportation policies, facing accusations from Democratic senators of illegally deporting U.S. citizens and legal residents. Noem cited a decrease in illegal border crossings as evidence of successful enforcement, while Democrats criticized the administration’s actions regarding specific cases, including the deportation of a U.S. resident and the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The hearing centered on the DHS’s proposed $175 billion budget request, intended to bolster border security measures and enforcement capabilities. Despite Democratic concerns about legal violations, Noem expressed confidence in congressional approval of the budget.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker