Nearly 50 people gathered outside Zorro Ranch, the former property of Jeffrey Epstein, to honor victims. This gathering occurred as New Mexico’s Attorney General announced the reopening of an investigation into alleged sex trafficking activities at the ranch. The state had previously halted its investigation in 2019 at the request of federal prosecutors, who assured they would share information for potential prosecutions, a promise later questioned by the former Attorney General.
Read More
Reports indicate that the US Justice Department has withheld documents from the Epstein files that contain allegations of Donald Trump sexually abusing a minor. These undisclosed pages reportedly include FBI interview notes detailing a woman’s claim of abuse by Mr. Trump in 1983 when she was approximately 13 years old. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have stated they can “confirm” the Justice Department appears to have illegally withheld these crucial FBI interviews, calling such actions a “White House cover-up” of potential presidential malfeasance.
Read More
The article details allegations made by a woman against the president, stating he forced her to perform oral sex and then punched and kicked her out. These accusations, dating back to the mid-1980s when the accuser was a minor, were contained within a 21-page slideshow found in FBI files. The existence of these FBI interview records within discovery files provided to Ghislaine Maxwell before her trial has raised concerns about potential blackmail leverage over the president. The woman’s account reportedly aligns with details from a separate victim lawsuit where another individual claimed brutal assault and rape by prominent men associated with Epstein.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi has asserted that no evidence of criminal activity by Trump exists, a statement that contributes to a pattern of denials from Trump officials. Simultaneously, FBI records, discovered by journalist Roger Sollenberger, reveal the bureau interviewed a specific woman at least four times during the summer of 2019. These interview records, which were accessible through a separate Epstein document database and provided to Ghislaine Maxwell’s defense, have since been removed from public view, despite legislation mandating transparency regarding Epstein-related documents.
Read More
It’s striking that a new poll reveals a majority, 53 percent, of respondents believe Donald Trump is attempting to cover up Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. This sentiment, while significant, also sparks a deeper question: why isn’t that number higher? The reaction from many is one of disbelief that it isn’t closer to 100 percent, suggesting that for a substantial portion of the public, the evidence or implications are so clear that any lesser figure seems almost incomprehensible.
The lingering 47 percent who don’t share this view are the subject of much speculation and frustration. Some comments imply a severe lack of awareness or understanding, with suggestions ranging from low IQ levels to an inability to grasp the gravity of the situation.… Continue reading
Public awareness of the recently released files concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case is high, with a majority of Americans expressing disapproval of Donald Trump’s handling of the investigation. A significant portion of the population believes Trump is attempting to conceal Epstein’s wrongdoings, with an equal number suspecting his personal involvement. These sentiments were captured in the Economist/YouGov Poll conducted between February 6-9, 2026, highlighting widespread public concern and skepticism regarding the ongoing Epstein investigations.
Read More
The Department of Justice has stated that certain documents presented to the FBI prior to the 2020 election contain “untrue and sensationalist claims” against Trump. These allegations are deemed unfounded and false, with the Department asserting that any potential credibility would have been exploited against him already. This official stance underscores the unsubstantiated nature of these specific claims.
Read More
Rep. Thomas Massie has publicly criticized the Trump administration, dubbing it the “Epstein administration” and accusing it of attempting to conceal information from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Despite a bipartisan congressional measure forcing the release of these documents, Massie claims the administration continues to protect powerful individuals named within them. Massie, who has personally clashed with President Trump over various issues, including the Epstein files, insists that unredacted versions of the documents, which he and other lawmakers have viewed, contain significant information about potential co-conspirators and enablers that is being withheld. The Department of Justice, however, maintains that its investigation yielded no incriminating evidence against anyone beyond Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
Read More
The notion that Pam Bondi’s actions regarding the Epstein case can be chalked up to mere incompetence feels like a profound insult to the victims, and frankly, to anyone paying attention. It’s a narrative that seeks to soften the edges of what appears to be something far more deliberate and calculated. The sheer volume of discussion points to a sentiment that this isn’t about a lack of skill or understanding, but rather a conscious choice to obstruct justice.
Instead of calling it incompetence, it seems more accurate to describe Bondi’s behavior as a deeply troubling form of callousness and dishonesty. Her tenure as Attorney General of Florida, a position requiring extensive experience and knowledge, suggests she possesses the capabilities to do her job.… Continue reading
Channel 4 News’ analysis of the recently released Epstein files suggests the information disclosed by the US Department of Justice may only represent a small portion, potentially as little as 2%, of the data the FBI initially recovered. Survivors have expressed to Channel 4 News their belief that the Trump administration did not fulfill their plea for the complete disclosure of all associated documents. This raises significant questions about the true extent of information yet to be revealed.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood