A new Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals that a significant majority of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, believe the Trump administration is concealing information about Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged child sex crimes and his death. The survey indicates that 70% of respondents think the administration is hiding details about Epstein’s associates, and 62% believe the government is hiding information surrounding his death. The poll further indicates that only a small percentage of Americans believe Trump was unaware of Epstein’s crimes, despite his efforts to distance himself from the disgraced financier.
Read More
Survivors of boat strike did not radio for backup, Bradley tells lawmakers: Report is a stark reminder of the gravity of the situation, immediately raising questions about the actions taken and the justifications provided. The core of the matter seems to be the assertion that the survivors of a boat strike did not attempt to call for assistance or any form of backup, a detail that is now being scrutinized in the context of potentially unlawful actions. The very premise of the statement is a loaded one, as it implies a specific expectation of behavior following a devastating event at sea.… Continue reading
An inquiry into alleged unlawful killings by British SAS units in Afghanistan has heard accusations of a cover-up by former UK special forces directors and other senior military officers. A whistleblower, identified as N1466, reported concerns about extrajudicial shootings, including the deaths of children, as early as 2011, but claims the chain of command failed to intervene. The whistleblower alleged that the director suppressed information and ordered a review of tactics to avoid scrutiny, despite awareness of the underlying issues. Evidence suggests the killings continued into 2013, with N1466 citing concerns about planted weapons and executions of detainees.
Read More
Investigative journalist Julie K. Brown discusses the impending release of Jeffrey Epstein’s case files, highlighting potential cover-ups and the likely search for prominent names like Trump and Acosta. She expresses skepticism about the Justice Department’s transparency, fearing efforts to protect powerful individuals implicated in Epstein’s network. Brown emphasizes the complicity of those who enabled Epstein, and she notes that Ghislaine Maxwell, whom Brown believes believes she will be pardoned, is the only person to be held accountable.
Read More
The Trump administration has undertaken an intense effort to prevent the release of the Epstein files, indicating concern over their contents. Despite the administration’s pressure campaign, the effort to block a vote on the files’ release failed. Newly released emails from the Epstein estate suggest Trump may have been more involved with Epstein’s activities than previously acknowledged, with several emails referencing Trump’s awareness or direct involvement with the alleged victims. These emails, dating from before, during, and after Trump’s presidency, raise serious questions about the extent of Trump’s knowledge and association with Epstein.
Read More
A prominent Democrat has accused the Trump administration of ending a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators, claiming it was a “shameful and gigantic cover-up”. The investigation, which reportedly involved interviews with nearly 50 women, was allegedly targeting a network of individuals involved in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. Despite these testimonies identifying over 20 co-conspirators, the investigation was abruptly halted, and case files were transferred to the Justice Department’s headquarters. The Democrat is now requesting information on the investigative steps taken since then.
Read More
JPMorgan Alerted U.S. to Epstein Transfers Involving Wall St. Figures (Gift Article)
So, let’s dive into this tangled web, shall we? The basic premise is this: JPMorgan Chase, one of the world’s largest financial institutions, alerted the U.S. government to suspicious financial transfers involving Jeffrey Epstein. It’s a headline that grabs your attention, because Epstein, of course, was the subject of heinous crimes. It immediately raises questions of complicity, cover-ups, and the potential involvement of powerful individuals. But here’s the kicker: JPMorgan, despite these alerts, continued to do business with Epstein for years. Now, that’s not exactly the actions of a concerned party, is it?… Continue reading
During a traffic stop in D.C. on October 17, a Homeland Security Investigations agent reportedly fired at least three shots at Phillip Brown, the driver of a vehicle, an incident not initially documented by Metropolitan Police Department officers in their reports. Despite two bullets piercing the passenger seat and one grazing Brown’s jacket, the officers omitted the shooting from their affidavit and incident report, allegedly due to instructions from a “team leader.” Brown was initially charged with fleeing law enforcement, but the charges were later dismissed, and the U.S. attorney offered a plea deal without knowledge of the shooting or access to body camera footage. Brown’s defense attorney is raising concerns about the withholding of critical evidence and the lack of transparency in the investigation.
Read More
According to a federal prison consultant, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has implemented an unprecedented system to conceal details surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell’s incarceration. This heightened secrecy followed her transfer to a Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas, after a visit from Trump’s former personal lawyer, now a high-ranking Department of Justice official. The BOP took extraordinary measures, including waiving public safety factors, to facilitate the transfer, with warnings given to both inmates and staff to avoid disclosing any information about Maxwell. The consultant speculated that these actions suggest a potential path to clemency or a possible cooperation agreement, raising questions about the motivations behind the intensive protection and secrecy.
Read More
Republicans refusing to swear in a newly elected Democrat is a blatant obstruction, and the implications are deeply concerning. It immediately brings into question the integrity of the entire process and raises suspicions about what they might be trying to hide. The fact that a duly elected official is being denied their right to serve, seemingly for political reasons, is a direct assault on the democratic process. It’s hard not to see this as a power grab, a deliberate attempt to undermine the will of the voters, and it’s all the more troubling given the context of the ongoing Epstein investigations.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood