Alien Cover-up

Feds Still Hide Shooters’ Names After Alex Pretti Killing

Following the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by immigration officers in Minneapolis, the US government has refused to release the identities of the agents involved. Video evidence contradicts claims made by Homeland Security officials, suggesting Pretti was not posing an active threat. Despite standard protocol for law enforcement-involved shootings, the agents remain on duty and have been moved from the city. Critics argue this lack of transparency suggests an unaccountable, secret police force and a cover-up, while some members of Congress are calling for an impartial investigation.

Read More

Epstein & Trump: An Unfolding Scandal Beyond Distraction

While the Justice Department delayed the release of Epstein files, likely fearing damaging revelations, Trump has engaged in aggressive actions such as threatening Greenland and deploying ICE agents in Minneapolis, seemingly attempting to overshadow the Epstein scandal. Public opinion is skeptical of the delay, with a significant portion believing it is a deliberate cover-up related to the president’s association with Epstein. Trump’s actions are indicative of a pattern of bullying and a predilection for targeting those perceived as vulnerable, as shown by his history of sexual abuse accusations and his approach to foreign policy. The article suggests this behavior reflects a desire to appear powerful by preying on the weak, much like Epstein.

Read More

Judge Rejects Special Master for Epstein Files, Signals Path for Victims

The judge’s decision to decline the appointment of a special master to oversee the release of the remaining Epstein files, while legally sound in its reasoning, has ignited a firestorm of frustration and suspicion. The core of the ruling hinges on the concept of “standing.” It seems the judge determined that the congressmen who requested the special master didn’t have the necessary legal standing to do so, meaning they weren’t directly impacted by the issue in a way that granted them the right to bring the case forward. However, the judge seemingly offered a subtle hint, suggesting that victims of Epstein’s crimes, who would likely have the standing needed, could bring the case themselves.… Continue reading

DOJ Opposes Special Master for Epstein Files, Fuels Cover-Up Allegations

The subject matter at hand revolves around the Justice Department’s stance against appointing a special master to oversee the release of the Epstein files. It’s a complex situation, and it seems the general sentiment is one of frustration and suspicion, to put it mildly. The DOJ is essentially arguing against outside oversight, and that immediately raises eyebrows, especially considering the sensitive nature of the documents and the prominent figures potentially implicated.

The crux of the matter is the fear that something nefarious is being protected. The DOJ’s arguments against a special master seem weak and contrived, fueling the idea of a cover-up.… Continue reading

Stansbury Slams Trump Admin Over Epstein Files Delay, Citing Cover-Up

In the midst of ongoing protests, reports indicate that Trump is considering military action against Iran. Elsewhere, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell confirmed a Department of Justice investigation. Other prominent news includes a representative criticizing Trump for delaying the release of Epstein files, and a Cuba historian warning of economic devastation if Venezuelan oil is cut off. Additionally, a new survey reveals declining support for Trump among young men, and GOP senators are diverging from the White House on a Venezuela vote.

Read More

Federal Agents Shoot Two in Portland: Growing Concerns of Impunity and Cover-Up

The FBI is responding to the scene, and it appears the unfolding events are under intense scrutiny. There’s a palpable sense that the truth might be buried, that independent investigation and unbiased evidence are under threat. It’s a sentiment echoing warnings about how authoritarian regimes operate, where each escalation, each seemingly small transgression, chips away at freedoms, leading to a point of no return. The current situation suggests this cycle of events is unfolding rapidly, potentially with the intention to obscure the facts and control the narrative.

The feeling of dismay is palpable, as it seems there is a very disturbing trend.… Continue reading

Trump Administration Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged Cover-Up of ICE Killing

Following the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem immediately declared it an act of domestic terrorism, a claim that was not supported by video evidence of the incident. Despite footage showing Good attempting to drive away from the agents, and witnesses reporting she was scared, the Trump administration, including former President Trump and Vice President JD Vance, amplified the rhetoric, demonizing Good and promoting conspiracy theories about a coordinated attack. Meanwhile, the administration is blocking state and local officials from participating in the investigation, citing a lack of jurisdiction and refusing to share evidence, raising concerns about the impartiality of the inquiry and the prospects for accountability in the shooting.

Read More

Minnesota Officials Say ICE Obstructing Fatal Shooting Investigation

Minn. Officials Say They’re Being Blocked From Investigating Fatal ICE Shooting

It’s becoming increasingly clear that Minnesota officials are facing significant hurdles in their investigation into the fatal shooting involving an ICE agent. The core issue boils down to obstruction – the state authorities feel their efforts to uncover the truth are being actively thwarted. This situation isn’t just frustrating; it raises serious questions about accountability and the rule of law.

One of the most concerning aspects is the apparent reluctance to cooperate. Reports suggest a lack of access to key information, including details about the agent involved, and potentially even to critical evidence.… Continue reading

Bondi’s Epstein Files: Missed Deadlines Spark Cover-Up Accusations

As Congress reconvenes, Democratic lawmakers are scrutinizing the Justice Department’s failure to meet the deadline for a report on the Jeffrey Epstein files. The department missed the January 3 deadline to explain redactions and provide a list of unredacted government officials and politically exposed persons named in the released materials. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused the Justice Department of withholding information, citing heavily redacted documents and a lack of key details on alleged co-conspirators. The Justice Department has yet to fully comply with the law that mandates the full release of the Epstein files.

Read More

Justice Department Reviews 5.2 Million Epstein Files, Raising Questions

Justice Dept. Now Said to Be Reviewing 5.2 Million Pages of Epstein Files – this announcement immediately sets off alarm bells, doesn’t it? It’s a staggering amount of documentation, especially when considering the initial narrative that these files either didn’t exist or weren’t readily accessible. The shift in story, from absence to needing time for review, feels deeply problematic.

A huge scandal is unfolding right before our eyes, and the question that begs to be asked is, “Why are they just *now* reviewing these files?” If these documents truly existed, and a law mandated their release, the delays and explanations offered simply don’t add up.… Continue reading