The Sandy Hook families, after years of battling Alex Jones and Infowars in bankruptcy court, have concluded that the current legal strategy isn’t yielding any results. They haven’t received a single dollar in compensation, despite millions spent on legal fees related to the bankruptcy proceedings. This protracted legal fight, marked by delays and what they perceive as a lack of progress, has led them to seek a different approach.
Their new plan involves shifting their focus to state courts, believing this will be more effective in obtaining the judgments awarded against Jones. They see this as the most direct path to finally receive the compensation they’re owed for the immense suffering Jones inflicted upon them.… Continue reading
Alex Jones, of Infowars, reported the death of his colleague, Jamie White, in Austin, Texas, alleging a brutal murder near White’s home. Austin police responded to an emergency call finding an injured man who later died, but have not yet confirmed the victim’s identity or details surrounding the incident. Jones blamed Austin’s Democratic district attorney and the Democratic Party for the death, citing their alleged failures to control crime. Infowars’ history of fabrications necessitates caution in accepting this account without further independent confirmation.
Read More
A bankruptcy judge recently blocked a proposed settlement in Alex Jones’ bankruptcy case, a decision that has sparked outrage and confusion amongst many. The settlement, intended to compensate the families of Sandy Hook victims for Jones’s defamatory statements, was deemed insufficient by the judge. This wasn’t a simple case of a judge arbitrarily rejecting a deal; rather, it appears the judge believed the current plan shortchanged the families.
The core issue revolves around the perceived inadequacy of the settlement offer in relation to the immense harm inflicted upon the Sandy Hook families. The judge’s intervention suggests a belief that the families deserve a significantly larger financial recompense, reflecting the gravity of the emotional and psychological damage caused by Jones’s actions.… Continue reading
First United American Companies, a firm linked to Alex Jones, has significantly increased its bid for Infowars to over $7 million, more than doubling its previous offer. This follows a voided auction where The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron, had initially won with a lower bid. The trustee overseeing Jones’ bankruptcy will now evaluate both the new offers from First United American and the expected renewed bid from Global Tetrahedron. The sale proceeds will primarily benefit the Sandy Hook families awarded damages in defamation lawsuits against Jones. The future of Infowars and the specifics of the sale process remain undetermined, pending court approval.
Read More
A bankruptcy judge rejected The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron’s, winning bid for Alex Jones’ Infowars, citing an insufficient bid and lack of transparency in the auction process. The judge ruled that the $1.75 million cash bid, combined with creditor concessions valued at $7 million, was less favorable than a rival bid of $3.5 million in cash. The decision leaves the future of Infowars uncertain, with the possibility of a new auction to determine the buyer of Jones’ assets, which are being sold to satisfy a $1.2 billion judgment. The judge did not fault the trustee, but criticized the process as insufficient in ensuring a maximized sale.
Read More
A US judge is currently deciding the fate of The Onion’s acquisition of Infowars, a deal that has sparked considerable debate. The sale resulted from a bankruptcy auction, with The Onion emerging as the winning bidder. However, Alex Jones and an associated company are contesting the sale, alleging fraud and collusion in the process. This argument, coming from a party that previously moved assets to circumvent bankruptcy proceedings, casts doubt on the credibility of their claims.
The judge’s role, central to the controversy, is to determine if the sale serves the best interests of creditors, according to bankruptcy law. This legal framework is crucial, directing that disputes are handled through neutral arbitration to ensure fairness.… Continue reading
Unlike other news sources adopting paid subscriptions, HuffPost remains committed to free access for all readers. This commitment requires reader support to maintain the provision of crucial information. Readers can contribute financially or, if unable, create a free account to help sustain this vital service. Continued access depends on community engagement.
Read More
The appeals court’s decision to uphold the nearly $1.3 billion verdict against Alex Jones in the Sandy Hook defamation case is a significant development. It represents a legal victory for the families of the Sandy Hook victims who have long sought justice for the immense emotional distress caused by Jones’s false claims that the massacre was a hoax. This decision essentially confirms the initial jury’s findings, solidifying the substantial financial penalty against Jones.
The sheer magnitude of the $1.3 billion judgment is striking and naturally raises questions. While it’s easy to be overwhelmed by the sheer number, the amount likely reflects the severity and scale of Jones’s actions.… Continue reading
X, owned by Elon Musk, is unprecedentedly intervening in the bankruptcy sale of Alex Jones’ Infowars, contesting the transfer of Jones’s X accounts. This action directly contradicts X’s terms of service prohibiting account sales and marks a departure from typical social media company practices. Legal experts note this is the first instance of a platform publicly challenging account ownership transfer in court, raising concerns about the platform’s future as a marketplace of ideas. The intervention, praised by Jones, may reflect Musk’s personal views and a strategic move to set a legal precedent.
Read More
Following a bankruptcy auction, a federal judge is considering whether to approve the sale of Alex Jones’s Infowars to The Onion, despite a competing bid from a Jones-affiliated company claiming a higher cash offer. The judge will hold an evidentiary hearing to assess the bankruptcy trustee’s decision-making process, specifically regarding the selection of The Onion’s bid, which included a revenue-sharing agreement with Sandy Hook victims’ families. The hearing will determine whether the sale proceeds, intended to satisfy defamation judgments, will be approved, another auction held, or further hearings conducted. The Onion’s bid, while lower in cash, was deemed by the trustee to benefit creditors more, prompting the legal challenge.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker