Today, I am pleased to announce my nomination of Tali Farhadian Weinstein and Chief Judge Frances Marie Tydingco-Gatewood to the United States District Courts for the Southern District of New York and Guam, respectively. Both nominees are highly qualified individuals with extensive legal experience, demonstrating a deep commitment to the rule of law and our Constitution. These nominations continue my administration’s commitment to building a judiciary that reflects the diversity of our nation, highlighting the rich tapestry of backgrounds and expertise that strengthens our nation’s legal system. These nominations mark the fifty-sixth round of judicial nominations, bringing the total number of announced nominees to 261.
Read More
While President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs are unwise, they are not unconstitutional, as federal law grants the president significant power to impose them. The Supreme Court, however, has established a “major questions doctrine” that allows it to veto executive branch actions deemed too ambitious. Given the Court’s recent history of using this doctrine to strike down Biden administration policies, it remains unclear whether they will apply it to Trump’s tariffs, potentially setting a dangerous precedent for future presidents. The upcoming legal battle over tariffs presents a dilemma: a ruling against them would further empower an already powerful Court, while a ruling in favor would cause economic hardship for many Americans.
Read More
Senator Bernie Sanders has publicly stated his opposition to calls for Justice Sonia Sotomayor to step down from the Supreme Court, despite recent speculation among some Democrats that doing so would allow President Biden to appoint a liberal replacement before the end of his term. Sanders believes that such a move is “not sensible” and has not elaborated further on his stance. This speculation arises from the upcoming transition of power, which will see a Republican president and a likely Republican-controlled Senate, potentially impacting the court’s ideological balance in the future. The debate echoes the situation surrounding Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s refusal to step down during President Obama’s term, which ultimately led to her conservative replacement after her death.
Read More
In a recent interview with The New York Times, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized the Supreme Court for its decision granting presumptive immunity to former presidents, calling the ruling an “embarrassment to our founders.” Pelosi argued that the court’s decision undermines justice and creates an environment where presidents are above the law. Although she acknowledged her differences with former President Donald Trump, she framed her criticism as a broader concern about institutional integrity. Pelosi also suggested that the timing of President Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race may have impacted the Democratic primary, potentially allowing for a stronger candidate to emerge.
Read More
A federal judge in Illinois has ruled the state’s ban on assault weapons unconstitutional, citing the Second Amendment and the Supreme Court’s recent decision regarding gun restrictions. The judge, Stephen McGlynn, found that the ban does not align with historical precedents for firearm regulations and that assault weapons are commonly used for self-defense. While the judge issued a permanent injunction prohibiting enforcement of the ban, he stayed it for 30 days to allow the state to appeal. The ruling has sparked controversy, with gun rights advocates celebrating and gun control advocates expressing concern over the potential impact on public safety.
Read More
The recent Supreme Court rulings, especially those impacting abortion rights and gun control, have significantly shifted the political landscape, with a significant impact on the Democratic Party. Concerns about a potential 7-2 conservative majority on the Court have led some to call for Justice Sotomayor’s retirement during the lame-duck period, but such calls seem unlikely to bear fruit due to her own lack of interest and Senator Manchin’s opposition to any nominee without GOP support. Looking ahead, the future of Democratic engagement with the Court remains uncertain, with the potential for reforms to be proposed, but historical precedent suggests such efforts may be futile. The outcome of the 2024 election and its impact on the Court’s composition will have a major bearing on how Democrats and the public react to future rulings.
Read More
Trent Russell, a former transplant coordinator, was sentenced to two years in prison for illegally accessing and disclosing the medical records of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Russell, who worked at the Washington Regional Transplant Community, accessed Ginsburg’s records in 2019 and published the information online alongside false claims about her health and death. While Russell’s motivations remain unclear, prosecutors argued that he targeted Ginsburg due to her public profile, age, and illness, making her particularly vulnerable. The court rejected Russell’s excuses, including a claim that his cat accessed the records, and emphasized the severity of the crime and the damage caused to Ginsburg’s privacy.
Read More
Donald Trump’s historic return to the White House, securing a second term, has sent shockwaves across the nation. While the 2020 election was a close race, the 2024 election was a landslide victory for Trump, with a significant shift in voter sentiment evident across key swing states. The Democratic party suffered a crushing defeat, losing ground even in states that were considered safe blue strongholds.
The magnitude of Trump’s victory is undeniable. He not only won the presidency but also secured a Republican majority in both the House and Senate, solidifying his control over all branches of government. The impact of this victory extends beyond domestic politics; it also has global implications.… Continue reading
The US Supreme Court denied an emergency appeal from the Republican party to prevent thousands of provisional ballots being counted in Pennsylvania. The justices have upheld a ruling by the state’s Supreme Court that demanded election officials count provisional votes from people whose mailed votes were rejected. The ruling has been welcomed by supporters of voters’ rights, who have forced predominantly Republican-controlled counties to let electors cast a provisional vote at the polls if their postal vote is rejected due to an error. By contrast, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court rejected a last-minute plea by campaigners for voters’ rights to ensure postal votes will still be counted even if they lack an accurate, handwritten date on the envelope.
Read More
Eight out of 11 justices on Mexico’s Supreme Court have resigned in response to a constitutional reform requiring judges to be elected by popular vote. The judges will formally step down in August and November 2025, but their departures have already deepened tensions between the Supreme Court and the government, potentially leading to a constitutional crisis. While three Supreme Court justices publicly support the reform, the resigning justices are careful to clarify their resignation does not signify agreement with the controversial changes.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood