The Judicial Conference rejected requests to refer Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Justice Department for ethics investigations. This decision, outlined in letters to Senator Whitehouse and Representative Johnson, cited both justices’ amended financial disclosures and legal uncertainty regarding the Conference’s authority over Supreme Court justices. The Conference Secretary argued that Congressional authorization would be necessary for such referrals. Despite these actions, critics contend the Judicial Conference failed to adequately address whether Justice Thomas willfully violated disclosure laws.
Read More
A US appeals court recently blocked the Biden administration’s attempt to reinstate net neutrality rules. This decision, leveraging the Supreme Court’s overturning of Chevron deference, has sparked significant debate and concern. Many believe this signifies a setback for consumers and a win for large corporations.
The argument that the court’s decision should end efforts to restore net neutrality and shift focus to other consumer concerns like improving internet access and promoting online innovation seems shortsighted. It’s not an either/or proposition; Americans can simultaneously prioritize both net neutrality and improvements in internet access and innovation. The idea of individually tailored internet plans, often presented as a benefit of ending net neutrality, rings hollow.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court will hear *Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton*, a case concerning a Texas law requiring age verification for online pornography. This law is nearly identical to a federal law struck down in *Ashcroft v. ACLU*, which the Fifth Circuit Court defied by upholding the Texas law despite the precedent. While Texas argues for modifying First Amendment protections regarding pornography, it also suggests the existence of privacy-preserving age-verification technology that could justify such laws. A ruling could either reaffirm existing precedents or significantly alter the balance between protecting minors and adult access to sexual content.
Read More
Donald Trump’s appointments created a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court supermajority, resulting in a string of far-right decisions impacting abortion, environmental protection, voting rights, and more. These rulings have significantly curtailed federal power and expanded state authority, often favoring business interests and limiting government regulation. Chief Justice Roberts, despite claiming judicial impartiality, criticized public criticism of the court’s actions, echoing Trump’s calls for silencing dissent. This follows a pattern of the court’s decisions aligning with a conservative political agenda, fueled by right-wing financial support.
Read More
Chief Justice Roberts’ annual report strongly condemns the “dangerous” rhetoric from various political figures who suggest ignoring federal court rulings. This disregard, he warns, must be rejected, citing past examples of administrations, including those of Eisenhower and Kennedy, upholding judicial decisions even when adverse to their interests. Roberts specifically criticizes attempts to intimidate judges through unfounded accusations of bias. The report highlights this issue’s urgency as President-elect Trump’s administration begins, given his past criticisms of the judiciary and potential conflicts with upcoming Supreme Court cases.
Read More
With nearly 120 anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ+ bills already filed across the U.S., 2025 is poised to surpass 2024’s record-breaking number of such legislative attacks. These bills, concentrated in states like Texas and Missouri, target transgender individuals through measures such as stripping legal recognition, enacting bathroom bans, and restricting participation in sports. Further restrictions include book bans and limitations on gender marker changes on identification documents. The upcoming Supreme Court decision on transgender rights will significantly impact the fate of these bills, potentially exacerbating or mitigating the devastating consequences for transgender communities.
Read More
Justice Thomas Did Not Disclose Additional Trips, Democrats Say
Justice Thomas’s failure to disclose additional trips has sparked outrage among Democrats. The lack of transparency surrounding these undisclosed trips raises serious questions about his adherence to ethical standards expected of a Supreme Court Justice. This situation highlights a broader concern regarding accountability for high-ranking officials.
The sheer volume of undisclosed travel raises questions about the extent of his unreported activities. It suggests a pattern of behavior that goes beyond simple oversight and raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. This lack of transparency erodes public trust in the integrity of the Supreme Court.… Continue reading
President Biden’s administration achieved a milestone by confirming 235 federal judges, surpassing the number confirmed during President Trump’s first term. This total includes one Supreme Court justice, 45 appeals court judges, and numerous district court judges, reflecting Biden’s prioritization of diverse candidates, such as public defenders and civil rights lawyers. While a historic achievement for the Biden administration, Republicans have indicated their intention to appoint a greater number of judges during Trump’s second term. Despite this, the Biden administration highlights the lasting impact of these lifetime appointments and the diversity of their judicial selections.
Read More
Despite repeated attempts by former President Trump to eliminate birthright citizenship via executive order, this is constitutionally impossible. The 14th Amendment explicitly grants citizenship to all persons born in the U.S. and subject to its jurisdiction, a principle affirmed repeatedly by the Supreme Court. Attempts to overturn this would require a constitutional amendment, not executive action. This right applies equally to children of all parents, regardless of immigration status, reflecting a foundational aspect of American equality.
Read More
Please provide the article you wish me to summarize. I need the text of the article to create a 3-5 sentence summary.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood