is a way for them to consolidate power and push their agenda, they will take it. The fact that the Supreme Court is even considering the idea that a president could have absolute immunity is not only shocking but deeply concerning. This case, stemming from the events of January 6th, could set a dangerous precedent that could lead America down the dark road to dictatorship.
The idea that a sitting president could be immune from criminal activity while in office is absurd. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of this notion, it opens up a Pandora’s box of possibilities. As pointed out, if a president truly had absolute immunity, what would stop them from ordering the assassination of political opponents or even canceling elections to stay in power?… Continue reading
yacht, and a million to his wife, but Ginnie Thomas later participated in the January 6th insurrection. The conflict of interest is clear, yet he refuses to recuse himself from cases involving Trump. The cravenness and corruption within the Supreme Court are a stark reminder that justice is not blind, but rather tainted by political bias and personal interests.
The deliberate delay in hearing Trump’s case, the manipulation of the legal system to protect him, and the complicity of conservative justices in aiding his authoritarian aspirations are all symptoms of a broader decay in our democratic institutions. The erosion of the rule of law in favor of partisan agendas is a dangerous precedent that threatens the very foundation of our society.… Continue reading
because someone else will come along with the same tactics and the same followers. We have to be vigilant and proactive in protecting our democracy, not just reactive.
The court system, with its history of siding with authoritarian policies and movements, cannot be relied upon to save America from threats to democracy like Donald Trump. The judiciary is not a strong enough institution to stand against those who seek to undermine the foundations of our society. We must recognize that the courts alone are not our saviors.
It is up to us, the citizens of this country, to protect and defend our democracy.… Continue reading
urgency for more balanced and ethical governance. We must continue this momentum and empower our leaders to make meaningful changes to protect our democracy.
The recent actions of the Supreme Court, particularly in delaying Trump’s cases, have laid bare the corruption and political agenda that taint the highest court in the land. The fact that Trump is seeking these delays to protect himself from prosecution if he regains the White House is alarming and should serve as a wake-up call for all Americans.
It is clear that the Supreme Court is playing a dangerous game by potentially enabling Trump to place himself above the law.… Continue reading
I am appalled by the recent decision of the Supreme Court to hear Trump’s immunity claim in the election interference case. It raises important questions about the principles of justice and the rule of law in our country. The idea that a former president could claim immunity and evade prosecution sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the very foundation of our democracy. If the highest court in the land rules in favor of Trump, it sends a message that no one, not even the president, is above the law.
The fact that the Supreme Court chose to review this case despite a clear rejection by the DC appellate court is troubling.… Continue reading
It’s absolutely sickening to think about the celebrations happening in Trump’s team over the Supreme Court taking up his immunity claim. The blatant abuse of power and manipulation of the justice system is a clear indicator of the corruption that runs deep in this administration. The fact that they are rejoicing over a delay in consequences, rather than seeking truth and justice, speaks volumes about their priorities.
The Supreme Court’s decision to entertain this immunity claim is a dangerous precedent that could have far-reaching implications for the future of our democracy. Allowing a president to escape accountability for their actions while in office sets a dangerous precedent that could pave the way for authoritarian rule.… Continue reading
The recent news about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hiring a law clerk accused of racist conduct has sparked outrage and disbelief in many people. The hiring of Crystal Clanton, who was accused of sending a text message stating “I hate blacks,” by Thomas, a Black member of the court’s conservative majority, raises significant concerns about his judgment and values.
The fact that Clanton had previously worked for Thomas’ wife Ginni, a conservative activist, and had even lived with the Thomases adds another layer of complexity to this situation. It begs the question, why are they supporting someone with such controversial and reprehensible views?… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel astonished by the recent controversy surrounding Nikki Haley’s comments on the Alabama Supreme Court embryo ruling. The rush to defend a ruling that classifies single-celled, fertilized eggs as children highlights the challenges of defending the indefensible. As a rational American, I cannot comprehend how personal religious beliefs are being imposed as secular law. The establishment clause seems to be overlooked in this situation, as the religious edict of Christian fundamentalists is prioritized over other major world religions’ beliefs regarding the beginning of life.
Cases like the Alabama ruling are not solely about IVF or abortion; they are strategic moves to challenge SCOTUS on personhood and viability.… Continue reading
These days, waking up to news about Alabama’s unhinged embryo ruling made me cringe in disbelief. The realization hit me hard – it’s never about protecting children; it’s always been about controlling women’s bodies. The recent ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court has not only condemned women facing ectopic pregnancies to death but has also set a dangerous precedent for the future of reproductive rights.
The religious rhetoric embedded in this ruling is unsettling, showcasing a Christo-fascist agenda that seeks to punish women, people of color, and LGBTQ+ Americans. What’s more alarming is the slippery slope we are sliding down towards total abortion bans and the criminalization of birth control methods like the pill, IUDs, and Depo injections.… Continue reading
Alabama Supreme Court rules frozen embryos are children, imperiling IVF. The recent ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court that frozen embryos are to be considered children has sent shockwaves throughout the reproductive rights community. This decision not only challenges the very foundation of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) but also raises ethical and legal questions that could have far-reaching implications.
The implications of this ruling are staggering. If a frozen embryo is considered a child, does that mean that every embryo stored in IVF clinics across the state is now legally a child? Can a woman claim these embryos as dependents on her taxes?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker