As I sit back and ponder the implications of the recent oral arguments before the Supreme Court, where the question of presidential immunity after ordering a coup was raised, I am left with a sense of disbelief and concern. The very notion that a sitting or former president could be immune to criminal prosecution unless impeached and convicted by Congress is not only absurd but also profoundly troubling. The arguments put forth by the petitioner’s lawyer, suggesting that a president can only be charged with a crime if specifically mentioned in a law or that the president can be immune from prosecution for all official acts, seem more like a page out of a dystopian novel rather than a credible legal defense.… Continue reading
The recent developments within the Supreme Court have left me feeling disillusioned and disheartened. It seems that the conservative majority on the court has abandoned their principles in a bizarre defense of Trump’s immunity claim. The court, which is supposed to uphold the highest values of justice and the Constitution, has lost the trust of the American people. It’s disheartening to witness how political motivations seem to overshadow the pursuit of justice and fairness.
Conservatism, as I understand it, is meant to uphold tradition and restore the past. However, what we are observing now is not an abandonment of conservative ideology but rather a more radical and reactionary strain of it.… Continue reading
It’s truly mind-boggling to see the level of corruption and manipulation that is at play in our current political climate. The fact that a former president, Donald Trump, could potentially walk away from inciting an insurrection unscathed is alarming, to say the least. This goes beyond just politics; it threatens the very core of our democracy.
J. Michael Luttig’s analysis of the potential outcomes from the Supreme Court arguments paints a grim picture for the future of our country. The idea that a president could have total immunity, even for acts as heinous as attempting to subvert the electoral process, sets a dangerous precedent.… Continue reading
I am deeply disturbed by the recent news that Justice Clarence Thomas has chosen not to recuse himself from another January 6-related case. It is incredibly troubling to see a Supreme Court Justice, whose duty is to uphold the rule of law and ensure justice is served, fail to remove himself from a case where his personal interests are clearly at play.
The fact that Justice Thomas’s wife, Ginni Thomas, played a role in the events of January 6th and is a known election denier should be reason enough for him to recuse himself from any cases related to this matter.… Continue reading
Team Trump seems to be ready to lose the Supreme Court immunity case, but surprisingly, they’re celebrating. The delay in the trial until after the election seems to be the cause of their jubilation. They have this unwavering confidence that Trump will win the election, and this delay will work in their favor. But as citizens, it’s up to us to rain on their parade by voting for Biden. The Supreme Court’s decision to take up the case ensured an 8 month delay, which was never in doubt.
It’s disheartening to see the system being manipulated in such a blatant manner.… Continue reading
I cannot believe the level of absurdity and blatant disregard for justice that was displayed by Justice Samuel Alito during the Trump immunity hearing. His logic was beyond belief, and it’s terrifying to think that he is at the center of one of the darkest days in Supreme Court history. The fact that he and other conservative justices on the Court are maneuvering to protect Trump from facing consequences for his actions is a clear indication of the dire state of our judicial system.
The argument that allowing presidents to commit federal crimes without consequence is necessary for the stability of our democracy is not only flawed but dangerous.… Continue reading
The recent headlines about Liz Cheney “nuking” the Supreme Court caught my attention, and I couldn’t help but dive deeper into the content behind the explosive terminology used. It is alarming to think that there is still so much we don’t know about what occurred on January 6th and that the Supreme Court may play a role in preventing the truth from coming to light.
Liz Cheney, a prominent conservative figure, has been vocal about the need for transparency and accountability, especially concerning the events of January 6th. Her warnings and calls for action highlight the seriousness of the situation and the potential implications for our democracy.… Continue reading
The majority of voters no longer trust the Supreme Court, and it’s not difficult to see why. The political landscape of the court has become riddled with corruption, bias, and a blatant disregard for the will of the people they are meant to serve. Just looking at some of the recent actions from certain justices showcases how far the court has fallen from its intended purpose.
Clarence Thomas, for example, has been embroiled in scandals and allegations of corruption, making it difficult to trust his judgment on any case. The fact that he didn’t recuse himself from cases involving his wife’s ties to the January 6th insurrection is alarming and raises serious questions about his impartiality.… Continue reading
The recent discussions surrounding presidential immunity have left me utterly stunned and appalled. The idea that staging a coup or assassinating political opponents could be considered official presidential acts is not only mind-boggling but also extremely concerning. The fact that Trump’s lawyer, John Sauer, is making these arguments with a straight face is simply unbelievable. It’s almost as if they are trying to dismantle the very foundation of democracy and accountability.
What strikes me the most is the lengths to which some individuals are willing to go to justify Trump’s behavior. The sheer audacity of claiming that a president should be immune from prosecution for any illegal actions they take while in office is beyond comprehension.… Continue reading
As I sit down to process and reflect on the recent news of Trump’s lawyer’s arguments before the Supreme Court, I can’t help but feel a sense of dread and disbelief at the implications of their statements. The idea that having a political rival killed could be considered an ‘official’ presidential act is not only abhorrent but also goes against the very principles of democracy and the rule of law that our nation is built upon.
The fact that these arguments are even being entertained at the highest levels of our judiciary system is a clear indication of how far the bar has been lowered by the former president.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker