I was appalled to learn about the recent revelations regarding Justice Alito and his extremist views. The idea that he sees himself as fighting a moral war on the side of God is not only disturbing but also completely unacceptable for someone sitting on the highest court in the land. The separation of church and state is a foundational principle of our nation, and to see a Supreme Court Justice openly admitting to prioritizing his personal religious beliefs over the rule of law is deeply concerning.
The fact that Justice Alito believes the battle for America ‘can’t be compromised’ due to fundamental differences is alarming.… Continue reading
The recent revelation of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s controversial statements captured on secret audio has sparked significant discourse and concern. Alito’s remarks during a reception for the Supreme Court Historical Society have raised eyebrows and ignited a firestorm of criticism. His assertion that “One side or the other is going to win” hints at a deep-seated bias that undermines the core principles of impartiality and fairness that should guide the highest court in the land.
The notion that fundamental differences cannot be compromised and that there is no middle ground is troubling. In a society as diverse and pluralistic as ours, the ability to find common ground and respect opposing viewpoints is essential for peaceful coexistence.… Continue reading
As I delve into the troubling news surrounding Donald Trump’s plea for the Supreme Court to intervene in his criminal conviction, I can’t help but be bewildered by the audacity and hypocrisy displayed in his actions. States’ rights have long been championed by Republicans as a cornerstone of our democracy, yet here we have Trump seeking federal intervention in a state court matter. It’s a stark reminder of the blatant double standards and self-serving agendas that seem to govern the actions of some politicians.
The fact that Trump is calling for the Supreme Court to bail him out of a criminal conviction is not only alarming but also showcases his disregard for the rule of law.… Continue reading
Clarence Thomas Finally Reports Gifts He Says Were ‘Inadvertently Omitted’ From Disclosures
When I read the recent news about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finally reporting gifts that he claims were ‘inadvertently omitted’ from his disclosures, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of frustration and disappointment. The fact that he omitted a plane trip to Indonesia, a yacht, and other luxury gifts raises serious concerns about his interpretation of his disclosure responsibilities.
It’s alarming to think that someone in such a prominent and influential position could overlook or intentionally hide significant gifts and favors. The pattern of excuses and ‘misunderstandings’ that have emerged over the years only adds to the skepticism surrounding his actions.… Continue reading
The recent revelation that Supreme Court Justices have received a whopping $6.6 million in gifts is nothing short of shocking. As a hardworking individual myself, I find it absolutely appalling that while I am not even allowed to accept a glass of water in the workplace, those in positions of immense power and influence are being showered with millions of dollars in “gifts”. It’s hypocritical, it’s corrupt, and it undermines the very foundation of the legal system in our country.
It is disheartening to realize that the highest unelected authorities in our nation, who are supposed to uphold justice and act as impartial arbiters, are entangled in a web of bribery and deceit.… Continue reading
Bribes, extravagant gifts, corruption – these are the words that come to mind when I think about the recent revelation that Clarence Thomas quietly admitted to receiving gifts from a shady right-wing billionaire. It’s unsettling to think that a Supreme Court justice, someone entrusted with upholding justice and fairness, could be involved in such unethical behavior. The fact that he only reported these gifts after they were uncovered by a news organization raises serious questions about his integrity and motives.
The amounts of these gifts are staggering, with Thomas receiving over $4 million in gifts since 2004. These are not just small tokens of appreciation, but rather luxurious trips and items that could easily sway opinions and decisions.… Continue reading
$4 million. That’s the amount of gifts that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has accepted during his career. Gifts. That’s what they are calling these donations. But let’s call a spade a spade – these are bribes. Bribes that go against all ethical standards and values that we hold dear in society.
As a state employee, I couldn’t even accept a cup of free coffee without facing repercussions. Yet here we have a Supreme Court Justice accepting millions of dollars in gifts. Where is the line drawn? Where is the accountability? Where is the justice in allowing someone in such a powerful position to be swayed by lavish gifts and monetary incentives?… Continue reading
It’s not every day that we come face to face with the realization that a member of the Supreme Court may be less than truthful. And yet, here we are, grappling with the allegations that Justice Samuel Alito may have been less than forthcoming in his explanation of a dispute with his neighbors. The neighbor in question has come forward, stating that the verbal altercation that took place in February 2021 did not align with Alito’s account of events.
The details of the dispute and its aftermath paint a picture of a Supreme Court Justice and his wife at odds with the very community in which they reside.… Continue reading
As I reflect on the recent call by House Speaker Mike Johnson to urge the Supreme Court to “step in” on the Trump verdict, I am left with a deep sense of dismay. The idea that one man, a former President no less, should be above the law is not only ludicrous but fundamentally dangerous to the very foundation of our democracy. The legal processes that have been in place for centuries were followed, a jury of peers weighed the evidence, and a verdict was reached. To now suggest that the highest court in the land should intervene to reverse that verdict is a blatant disregard for the rule of law and the principles of justice.… Continue reading
When it comes to the recent developments surrounding Donald Trump and the legal case against him, the call from Mike Johnson for the Supreme Court to “step in” raises some serious concerns. It’s troubling to see a top lawmaker advocate for such an action, especially when it pertains to a state-level conviction. The idea of the Supreme Court intervening in a case like this seems to go against the principles of our legal system and the separation of powers.
Trump had every opportunity to present a defense in this case, and the fact that he was unable to successfully dispute the charges is a testament to the rule of law.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood