The Supreme Court, a once revered institution tasked with upholding justice and safeguarding our democracy, has devolved into a farce. The recent ruling that inadvertently referenced laughing gas as a basis for their decision is not only absurd but downright dangerous. How can we trust a group of individuals who seem more concerned with making a mockery of the legal system than actually serving the greater good of the American people?
It’s clear that the conservative majority on the Supreme Court is driven by their own ideological agenda rather than a commitment to upholding the law. The decision to prioritize judges’ interpretations over the expertise of agency regulators is a blatant power grab that puts the lives and well-being of American citizens at risk.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s recent decision to put the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Good Neighbor plan” on hold is yet another blow to environmental protections in our country. It seems that every time we turn around, there’s another regulation being dismantled, and it leaves me wondering why these decisions are happening so rapidly. Is it because big money corporations are pulling the strings, prioritizing profits over people and the planet?
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s reasoning for granting the challengers’ request to put the EPA’s plan on hold is flawed. The EPA had a valid explanation for their actions, aiming to reduce pollution from power plants and industrial sources in upwind states that were not meeting the “Good Neighbor” provision of the Clean Air Act.… Continue reading
The recent Supreme Court ruling allowing cities to enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outside has sparked a wave of controversy and mixed emotions among the public. As someone who has experienced homelessness personally, this decision strikes a chord deep within me. The ruling, authored by Gorsuch and joined by other conservative justices, goes against the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ previous stance that such bans violate the Eighth Amendment in areas with insufficient shelter space.
The case originated in Grants Pass, Oregon, a town struggling with a high poverty rate and limited resources. The local ordinances fined individuals for sleeping outside, leading to overcrowded public parks with tents.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court has just dealt a fatal blow to forty years of administrative law by killing the Chevron Deference. This means that agencies will no longer have the authority to regulate statutory ambiguities, leaving it up to judges to make crucial decisions regarding everything from E. coli in pork loin to food purity laws. This decision represents a major power grab by the conservative majority in the court, showing a clear dedication to corporate interests over public safety and expertise.
With this ruling, we are witnessing a dismantling of the separation of powers and a shift towards a system where judges, many of whom lack scientific knowledge, will now have the final say on important regulatory matters.… Continue reading
Homeless people can be ticketed for sleeping outside. The Supreme Court has ruled, and it is a decision that has sparked outrage and dismay among many. The idea that being poor or without a home is now a criminal offense is beyond comprehension. It is a clear indication of a society that has lost its compassion, its sense of humanity, and its moral compass.
The implications of this ruling are dire. It criminalizes poverty, turning those who are already marginalized and vulnerable into criminals. Instead of addressing the root causes of homelessness, such as lack of affordable housing, mental health issues, and systemic inequality, this decision further punishes those who are already suffering.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s recent decision to weaken federal regulators by overturning the decades-old Chevron decision is a devastating blow to the foundations of our government. With all GOP-appointed justices ruling to erase this precedent, billions of dollars are now potentially at stake in challenges that could arise from this ruling. As someone who may soon witness a resurgence of environmental disasters and public health crises, I find it alarming that the highest court in the land is effectively stripping away the power of federal agencies to protect us from corporate greed and negligence.
The implications of this decision are far-reaching and concerning.… Continue reading
I find it humorous, in a rather sad way, that there is still this pervasive idea floating around that the Supreme Court is some beacon of impartiality and justice. The reality is far from that; the Court is deeply entrenched in politics and ideology, just like any other branch of government. To even make it onto the Supreme Court, you need political connections and an ideology that aligns with the president who nominated you. The notion that justices are chosen solely for their judicial acumen is a farce; it all comes down to party ideology and political maneuvering.
The entire process of selecting Supreme Court justices reeks of politics and power plays.… Continue reading
The situation with the Supreme Court rejecting the nationwide opioid settlement with Purdue Pharma is a complex and controversial one. On one hand, the Court made a technically correct ruling based on the interpretation of the Bankruptcy Code. However, the implications of this decision are far-reaching and deeply impactful, especially for the victims of the opioid crisis.
The crux of the matter lies in the fact that the settlement would have shielded the Sackler family from civil lawsuits while providing billions of dollars to combat the opioid epidemic. Sure, the Sacklers agreed to contribute up to $6 billion and give up ownership of the company, but they would have retained billions more.… Continue reading
The recent Supreme Court ruling regarding the difficulty of charging Capitol riot defendants with obstruction and the charge that Trump faces is, quite frankly, shocking. The 6-3 decision to narrow the definition of obstruction to include only those who tried to tamper with or destroy documents undermines the severity of the events that unfolded on January 6th, 2021. How can violently breaching the Capitol not be considered obstruction to an official proceeding?
Chief Justice John Roberts, along with a mix of liberal and conservative justices, supported this narrow interpretation of the law, arguing that a broader reading could criminalize everyday conduct.… Continue reading
Steve Bannon must report to prison by Monday after the Supreme Court rejected his last-minute appeal. It’s been a whirlwind of emotions watching this political drama unfold, and I can’t help but feel a sense of satisfaction knowing that even someone as well-connected as Bannon is not above the law. The fact that he will have to face the consequences of his actions is a small victory in a world where it often feels like the elite can evade justice.
The Supreme Court’s decision sends a clear message that no one, not even those with power and privilege, is immune to the consequences of breaking the law.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker