I find it humorous, in a rather sad way, that there is still this pervasive idea floating around that the Supreme Court is some beacon of impartiality and justice. The reality is far from that; the Court is deeply entrenched in politics and ideology, just like any other branch of government. To even make it onto the Supreme Court, you need political connections and an ideology that aligns with the president who nominated you. The notion that justices are chosen solely for their judicial acumen is a farce; it all comes down to party ideology and political maneuvering.
The entire process of selecting Supreme Court justices reeks of politics and power plays.… Continue reading
The situation with the Supreme Court rejecting the nationwide opioid settlement with Purdue Pharma is a complex and controversial one. On one hand, the Court made a technically correct ruling based on the interpretation of the Bankruptcy Code. However, the implications of this decision are far-reaching and deeply impactful, especially for the victims of the opioid crisis.
The crux of the matter lies in the fact that the settlement would have shielded the Sackler family from civil lawsuits while providing billions of dollars to combat the opioid epidemic. Sure, the Sacklers agreed to contribute up to $6 billion and give up ownership of the company, but they would have retained billions more.… Continue reading
The recent Supreme Court ruling regarding the difficulty of charging Capitol riot defendants with obstruction and the charge that Trump faces is, quite frankly, shocking. The 6-3 decision to narrow the definition of obstruction to include only those who tried to tamper with or destroy documents undermines the severity of the events that unfolded on January 6th, 2021. How can violently breaching the Capitol not be considered obstruction to an official proceeding?
Chief Justice John Roberts, along with a mix of liberal and conservative justices, supported this narrow interpretation of the law, arguing that a broader reading could criminalize everyday conduct.… Continue reading
Steve Bannon must report to prison by Monday after the Supreme Court rejected his last-minute appeal. It’s been a whirlwind of emotions watching this political drama unfold, and I can’t help but feel a sense of satisfaction knowing that even someone as well-connected as Bannon is not above the law. The fact that he will have to face the consequences of his actions is a small victory in a world where it often feels like the elite can evade justice.
The Supreme Court’s decision sends a clear message that no one, not even those with power and privilege, is immune to the consequences of breaking the law.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s recent decision to strip the SEC of a critical enforcement tool in fraud cases is a significant blow to the agency’s ability to regulate financial misconduct effectively. This ruling, which mandates that individuals accused of fraud by the SEC have the right to a jury trial in federal court, marks a crucial shift towards ensuring due process and fairness in the judicial system. While some may argue that this decision could potentially defang regulatory agencies like the EPA, FDA, and FTC due to increased resources required for public trials, it is essential to prioritize protecting the rights of individuals accused of financial wrongdoing.… Continue reading
As I sat down to read the latest news, I was shocked and appalled to learn that the Supreme Court has wiped out an anti-corruption law that prohibited officials from taking gifts in exchange for past favors. It seems that the distinction between bribery, which involves an illegal deal, and a gratuity, which can be a gift or reward for a past favor, is now being used to justify accepting gifts after the fact without consequence. This ruling essentially legalizes corruption and bribery, as long as the bribe is given after the corrupt act has taken place.
What message does this send to the American people?… Continue reading
Today, I woke up to the news that we just witnessed the biggest Supreme Court power grab since 1803. As an American citizen deeply invested in the fabric of our society, this revelation shook me to my core. The implications of this decision go far beyond a mere legal ruling – they strike at the heart of our nation’s democratic principles and the balance of power that upholds our system of governance. The Supreme Court, in overturning the Chevron deference, has essentially given itself unprecedented authority to dictate how laws are enforced, a power that rightfully belongs to Congress and the executive branch.… Continue reading
The recent Supreme Court decision to wipe out an anti-corruption law that bars officials from taking gifts for past favors has left me absolutely dumbfounded. The fact that 6 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices have been given gifts after doing favors and have now conspired to make it legal is a clear indicator of the blatant corruption that exists within our highest judicial body. It is truly disheartening to see the law being manipulated to protect the interests of those in power, rather than upholding justice and fairness.
One particular case that highlights the absurdity of this decision is that of James Snyder, the mayor of Portage, Ind.… Continue reading
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s recent comments on the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding bribery have struck a nerve with me. The fact that Thomas and Alito, who have seemingly benefited from questionable practices themselves, are the ones voting against tightening the criteria for bribery is a blatant display of self-interest. It is disheartening to see the highest echelons of our legal system engaged in such unethical behavior.
The Supreme Court’s decision to rewrite bribery laws to exclude kickbacks sets a dangerous precedent. It sends a message that our court system, and by extension our country, is for sale to the highest bidder. As a government worker in a small municipality, I am held to higher ethical standards than some of our Supreme Court Justices.… Continue reading
What the hell is going on with the Supreme Court’s Trump ruling? The situation seems more convoluted and corrupt than ever before. It appears that the court is intentionally dragging its feet and delaying the decision to grant Trump immunity, all while trying to ensure that the ruling does not apply to Biden. The justices seem to be playing a dangerous game of political manipulation, trying to keep Trump in power and avoid any repercussions for his actions.
The whole scenario reeks of corruption and abuse of power. The Supreme Court, which is supposed to be the ultimate arbiter of justice, has turned into a tool for those in positions of extreme power to manipulate the legal system to their advantage.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker