President Trump’s executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, directly contradicting the 14th Amendment and established Supreme Court precedent, most notably *United States v. Wong Kim Ark*. The order’s immediate legal challenges have a high likelihood of success, despite the current Supreme Court’s conservative leaning. Even the justices in *Plessy v. Ferguson*, known for its racist ruling, upheld birthright citizenship in *Wong Kim Ark*, demonstrating the strength of the 14th Amendment’s clear language. The continued assertion of birthright citizenship reaffirms the nation’s commitment to legal equality for all born within its borders.
Read More
The Supreme Court unanimously upheld a law banning TikTok in the U.S. due to national security concerns regarding its ties to China, rejecting TikTok’s challenge. The law mandated ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, divest from TikTok or face a U.S. ban. Following a temporary shutdown, President-elect Trump intervened, promising an executive order to allow TikTok’s continued operation in the U.S., pending a long-term solution involving potential U.S. ownership. This action led to TikTok restoring service. However, the law remains in effect, leaving TikTok’s future in the U.S. uncertain despite the temporary reprieve.
Read More
A U.S. law mandating the sale of TikTok to a non-Chinese owner, upheld by the Supreme Court, resulted in the app’s unavailability on Saturday. The app’s message attributed the shutdown to the enacted ban, while also expressing hope for a solution. ByteDance’s other apps also faced similar disruptions. President-elect Trump hinted at a potential 90-day extension, creating uncertainty regarding TikTok’s long-term future in the U.S. This situation follows considerable debate regarding national security concerns and free speech implications.
Read More
The Supreme Court will hear an appeal from parents in Montgomery County, Maryland, challenging a school policy that includes books with LGBTQ characters in elementary school classes. The parents contend this violates their religious freedom by not allowing opt-outs, citing similar provisions for sex education and the district’s initial allowance of such opt-outs. The books, which depict various LGBTQ+ themes and relationships, were part of the English language arts curriculum. The school district argues the books are a small portion of the curriculum and explore common themes found in classic literature.
Read More
Prominent Supreme Court attorney and SCOTUSblog co-founder Tom Goldstein was indicted on federal tax evasion charges, accused of failing to declare millions in poker winnings from 2016 to 2021. The indictment alleges he used his law firm’s funds to pay gambling debts and made false statements to mortgage lenders, totaling over $5.3 million in unpaid taxes. Goldstein, who has a notable legal career including representing Al Gore in *Bush v. Gore*, pleads not guilty and plans to vigorously contest the charges. The indictment also details alleged misuse of firm funds for personal expenses, including the payment of expenses for multiple women.
Read More
The Supreme Court unanimously upheld a federal ban on TikTok, citing national security risks posed by its Chinese ownership. The ruling allows the ban to take effect unless TikTok is sold by its parent company, ByteDance, a sale that currently seems unlikely. While existing users may retain access initially, the app will become unusable without updates and new downloads. The Court rejected First Amendment challenges, emphasizing Congress’s determination that divestiture is necessary to address national security concerns.
Read More
Following the 2020 election, numerous corporations and wealthy donors suspended contributions to Trump-aligned causes. Despite many resuming donations, Trump maintains a list of those who did not, leveraging his continued fundraising success to reward loyalists and pressure former contributors. This financial power allows him to influence Republican politics, act as a kingmaker, and potentially deter opposition to his agenda. His message emphasizes his continued success despite the lack of support from these entities.
Read More
The Supreme Court is currently hearing a case arguing that the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, promotes “homosexual behavior.” This claim centers on the ACA’s mandate requiring insurance providers to cover pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a medication significantly reducing HIV transmission.
The lawsuit, initiated by individuals and a Texas business, Braidwood Management, alleges that covering PrEP, along with screenings for sexually transmitted diseases, violates their moral objections and promotes behaviors they disapprove of. This argument seems to fundamentally misunderstand the purpose of preventative healthcare.
The case echoes the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court decision, which allowed companies to refuse to cover medical therapies conflicting with their religious beliefs.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from fossil fuel companies seeking to dismiss a Honolulu lawsuit alleging a decades-long misinformation campaign regarding climate change. This allows the lawsuit, which claims violations of state law including public nuisance and failure to warn, to proceed to trial. The decision is a significant victory for climate accountability lawsuits nationwide, representing the fourth time the Court has rejected similar appeals from the industry. The industry expressed disappointment, while supporters of the lawsuit hailed the decision as a crucial step toward holding fossil fuel companies accountable for their actions.
Read More
The Supreme Court rejected Utah’s attempt to seize control of vast federal lands, delivering a victory for conservationists concerned about similar state-level challenges. The court’s decision, issued without explanation, halts Utah’s lawsuit seeking control of nearly half its federally managed land, an area comparable in size to South Carolina. This action comes amidst a Republican-controlled Congress’s adoption of rules potentially facilitating public land transfer or sale, raising further concerns about privatization and environmental degradation. While Utah leaders expressed disappointment, they indicated intent to pursue alternative legal avenues and collaboration with the federal government. Conservation groups, however, remain vigilant, prepared to contest any future efforts to diminish federal land protections.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood