Rep. Victoria Spartz’s refusal to caucus with Republicans shrinks the GOP’s House majority to a razor-thin margin, potentially as low as one seat, following the resignations of Reps. Matt Gaetz and expected departures of Reps. Elise Stefanik and Mike Waltz. This dramatically hinders Speaker Mike Johnson’s ability to pass legislation, including essential spending bills and President-elect Trump’s agenda. The narrow majority increases reliance on Democratic cooperation, which is now less likely given the change in presidential administration. The situation could improve if Democrats also vacate seats, but the GOP’s immediate legislative prospects are severely challenged.
Read More
A recent GOP report recommends that Liz Cheney be criminally investigated for her work on the January 6th committee. This recommendation is raising eyebrows and sparking intense debate, particularly regarding the motivations behind it and the potential implications.
The suggestion of a criminal investigation immediately brings to mind the question of *what* crime Cheney is alleged to have committed. Some argue that the recommendation is purely political theater, a calculated move to retaliate against a prominent Republican critic of Donald Trump. This perspective highlights the seeming lack of concrete evidence of criminal wrongdoing on Cheney’s part, and suggests the whole endeavor is an act of political retribution rather than genuine justice-seeking.… Continue reading
Concluding his Senate term, Mitt Romney asserted that the Republican Party, now largely shaped by Donald Trump, has drifted from its traditional conservative base. He cited Trump’s disregard for truth and questionable behavior as reasons for his opposition, despite often aligning on policy. Romney predicts a Trump-aligned Congress and foresees J.D. Vance as a potential future presidential nominee. While attributing working-class support for Trump to Democratic missteps, Romney expressed concern over the GOP’s potential to retain this base due to its policy stances. He plans to retire from active politics, focusing instead on non-partisan public service initiatives.
Read More
As Senator Romney departs, he acknowledges the Republican Party’s transformation under Donald Trump’s influence, noting the dwindling number of “mainstream” Republicans. While he supported many of Trump’s policies, Romney cited character concerns as points of conflict, including Trump’s past legal battles and rhetoric. Despite this, Romney doesn’t anticipate retribution from Trump, believing a successful presidency will solidify a future for the party shaped by figures like J.D. Vance. Romney concludes his political career, emphasizing his legislative accomplishments and expressing a desire to pursue post-political endeavors.
Read More
House Republicans successfully blocked a Democrat-led resolution demanding the release of a House Ethics Committee report investigating allegations against former Rep. Matt Gaetz. The GOP employed a procedural maneuver, referring the resolution to committee, effectively halting public dissemination of the report. Speaker Mike Johnson argued the report was moot since Gaetz is no longer in Congress, while Democrats criticized the decision as prioritizing secrecy over transparency. The report’s findings, which include allegations of sexual misconduct, drug use, and obstruction of justice, remain undisclosed.
Read More
With Donald Trump’s presidency looming, concerns are rising within Republican circles regarding the potential negative impacts of his key policy proposals. While hesitant to openly criticize Trump, GOP-affiliated groups are subtly suggesting a reevaluation of his plans. This implicit critique reveals an underlying acknowledgment that several of Trump’s prominent campaign promises may be fundamentally unrealistic or detrimental. The cautious nature of this dissent highlights the powerful influence Trump maintains within the Republican party.
Read More
A Florida GOP House candidate recently made headlines with a comment suggesting that Representatives Tlaib and Omar “might consider leaving before I get there.” The statement, delivered with an implied threat of unspecified action, sparked immediate controversy and raised concerns about the increasingly heated rhetoric in American politics.
The comment itself is vague, leaving the exact meaning and intended consequences open to interpretation. It could be dismissed as mere bluster, a brash attempt to garner attention and appeal to a specific base. However, the context of escalating political tensions, combined with the candidate’s past statements and actions, casts a shadow of unease over the situation.… Continue reading
Senator Bill Hagerty dismissed concerns regarding FBI background checks for President-elect Trump’s cabinet nominees, asserting that the public prioritizes policy implementation over the vetting process. He argued that the Biden administration’s perceived failures necessitate a swift replacement of officials, regardless of background checks. Hagerty further suggested that the FBI may be unqualified due to alleged weaponization, despite a lack of evidence supporting this claim. However, he assured that any background checks would be completed rapidly.
Read More
Following House Republicans’ announcement that transgender lawmakers will be barred from using bathrooms aligning with their gender identity, Senator John Fetterman offered his office bathroom to Representative-elect Sarah McBride. This offer comes in response to attacks from Republican lawmakers, including a proposed bill restricting bathroom access based on biological sex. McBride, while disagreeing with the policy, stated her intention to comply with the rules, prioritizing her legislative work. Fetterman’s action underscores his support for transgender rights and contrasts sharply with the actions of some Republican colleagues.
Read More
The GOP is bracing for the upcoming hearings on Matt Gaetz, predicting a spectacle far exceeding the intensity of the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation process. They’re warning that it will be a “Kavanaugh on steroids” situation, hinting at a level of scrutiny and drama that dwarfs even the already highly charged Kavanaugh hearings.
This anticipation suggests that Republicans foresee a protracted and highly publicized battle, likely filled with accusations and counter-accusations. The comparison to the Kavanaugh hearings implies an expectation of intense questioning, emotional outbursts, and potentially, a highly partisan atmosphere.
The use of “steroids” to amplify the Kavanaugh comparison implies a belief that the Gaetz hearings will be even more contentious and emotionally charged than the previous event.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood