According to Congressman Ro Khanna, only a minuscule portion of the documents recently released by the Department of Justice to the House Oversight Committee were actually new. Khanna stated that a mere 3% of the provided materials were previously unseen, representing less than 1% of the complete Epstein files. The congressman shared these details during an interview on The Weekend program. This limited release raises further questions about the government’s transparency regarding the Epstein investigation.
Read More
Justice Dept. Sent Congress Epstein Files That Were Already Public, Democrats Say – this news, as it unfolds, feels like a familiar dance, a frustrating routine of revelations and obfuscations. The core issue is this: the Justice Department sent files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case to Congress, but a significant portion – a staggering 97%, according to Representative Robert Garcia – was already in the public domain. The remaining 3% of the documents, it’s implied, contain some level of novel information.
It’s hard to ignore the feeling that this is all a calculated move, a play to control the narrative and potentially bury anything truly damaging.… Continue reading
The House Oversight Committee has begun reviewing the initial batch of Epstein files, sparking renewed scrutiny of Donald Trump and the Department of Justice. Representative Melanie Stansbury, a member of the Oversight Committee, has shed light on the ongoing investigation and its next steps. These documents promise to unveil new information related to Epstein’s network. Further details on the contents of the files are expected as the investigation continues.
Read More
The judge’s decision to deny the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to unseal Jeffrey Epstein’s records from the criminal case has ignited a flurry of opinions and accusations. It seems like the court is sticking to the rules, as the nature of the records in question – grand jury testimony and exhibits – carries significant legal restrictions on their release. Many observers believe the DOJ’s request was more about public optics than a genuine pursuit of justice. It was designed to create a narrative of thwarted transparency and shift blame to the judiciary.
The legal framework surrounding grand jury information is remarkably strict, making its public disclosure exceptionally rare.… Continue reading
The Justice Department will provide documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation to the House Oversight Committee, averting a potential separation of powers dispute. The records will be turned over beginning Friday, following a broad subpoena issued by the committee earlier this month. This commitment to transparency comes after an earlier decision by the FBI and Justice Department to not release further records. The House committee’s subpoena requested all documents and communications related to the Epstein and Maxwell cases, as well as communications between the current administration and the Justice Department regarding the case.
Read More
Secret White House spreadsheet ranks US companies based on loyalty to Trump, which is quite the revelation, isn’t it? It seems the inner workings of a past administration were a bit more… involved than many of us might have imagined. The very idea of a ranking system, based not on merit or performance but on perceived loyalty, is unsettling, to say the least. It’s the kind of thing that, in a different context, might be considered a symptom of something far more concerning.
This isn’t just about politics; it’s about how power is wielded, and who it favors. The implication is that companies were being assessed not on the value they provided to the country, their innovation, or their contribution to the economy, but on their allegiance to a single individual.… Continue reading
The appointment of an “emergency police commissioner” in Washington by Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi is viewed as an attempt to divert attention from the Epstein files, which have been a source of discomfort for the White House. Bondi’s actions come amid the backdrop of a city experiencing a 30-year low in crime rates, suggesting the appointment may be politically motivated rather than a response to genuine safety concerns. The author suggests the administration is using the issues of crime and homelessness to regain support while potentially avoiding transparency regarding the Epstein controversy, particularly given the early end of the House session to prevent a vote on releasing those files. The author argues that these actions are not aimed at benefiting the public but are instead driven by the interests of certain individuals, as exemplified by historical examples of political interference.
Read More
A billboard erected by Indivisible Jackson TN in Jackson, Tennessee, is demanding the release of the Epstein files, featuring images of Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell. The group solicited funds to put up the billboard, which poses the question, “What ya hiding, boys?”. The Justice Department announced in July it would not release more files related to the Epstein investigation. The Associated Press reported that President Trump responded to questions on the matter by suggesting people focus on the country’s performance.
Read More
Jeffrey Epstein’s sordid tale is poised to re-enter the congressional spotlight, and the battle lines are already being drawn. The expectation is that this renewed focus on the case will force a reckoning, particularly within the Republican Party. The central question is whether enough Republicans, worried about the political fallout from the Epstein scandal, will join Democrats in demanding the full release of the infamous Epstein files. This could reveal the full extent of the network and expose those who may have benefited from his crimes.
The timing of this potential re-emergence is interesting, with Congress now back from a significant break.… Continue reading
The public’s deep distrust in governmental institutions necessitates transparency and accountability, with the release of the Epstein files being a critical first step. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s trafficking and abuse of young women and children, spanning decades, warrants the exposure of all involved individuals, protecting the victims in the process. The Epstein Files Transparency Act aims to compel the Attorney General to release these files promptly, allowing for the identification and holding accountable of anyone connected to these crimes. This action aligns with the public’s overwhelming desire for transparency, ultimately fostering trust in government and ensuring justice for the victims.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood