Senate GOP blocks amendment to release Epstein files, and the immediate reaction feels like a deep sigh, a sense of weary resignation. It’s not surprising, is it? The Guardians of Pedophiles, as some are calling them, have once again done what many expect. The amendment, designed to bring transparency to the dark corners surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, was shut down. It’s a move that reinforces a perception, a fear, that the powerful are shielding themselves, regardless of the cost to justice or public trust.
The motivations behind this block are, of course, being fiercely debated. Some suggest that the reluctance to release the files stems from a desire to protect certain individuals, regardless of political affiliation.… Continue reading
California lawmakers have unanimously passed a bill, AB 1370, that prohibits them from signing non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) when making decisions about taxpayer funds or creating state laws. This legislation was prompted by reports of NDAs being used to conceal details of the $1.1 billion Capital Annex project and during negotiations for the fast-food labor law, including an exemption for bakeries. While the bill marks a step toward transparency, it is limited to lawmakers and does not restrict the use of NDAs by lobbyists or the Governor’s office. The bill has now advanced to the State Senate for further consideration.
Read More
In response to the Justice Department’s reluctance to release a list of individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein, a group of his victims, including the family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, announced plans to independently compile and publish their own list. This decision follows growing frustration over the lack of transparency, despite the release of some documents that largely contained previously available information. Survivors have been gathering evidence, including emails and flight logs, and will move forward with their initiative if authorities continue to withhold crucial details. Bipartisan pressure is mounting on the Justice Department to release all unclassified records, but former President Donald Trump has dismissed the survivors’ demands as a “Democrat hoax.”
Read More
The Department of Justice is seeking to keep the names of two Jeffrey Epstein associates confidential after they received a combined $350,000 from him in 2018. NBC News filed a motion to unseal the names, but the DOJ is resisting, citing privacy concerns as the associates have objected to their names being released. The associates, described as “co-conspirators,” allegedly received the payments around the time of renewed scrutiny on Epstein’s past plea deal and were promised immunity from prosecution. Prosecutors suggest the payments may be evidence of efforts to influence witnesses.
Read More
The Justice Department has asked a federal judge to keep the names of two associates who received significant payments from Jeffrey Epstein in 2018 sealed, citing privacy concerns. These payments, totaling $100,000 and $250,000 respectively, were made shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing stories critical of Epstein’s 2008 plea deal. Prosecutors had previously argued the payments were evidence of efforts to influence potential witnesses, who were also given protection from prosecution in the plea agreement. NBC News requested the names be unsealed due to Epstein’s death and the closure of criminal proceedings, but the Justice Department is defending the associates’ privacy interests.
Read More
GOP support erodes for Epstein files petition. It seems the initial enthusiasm, if it ever truly existed, for the release of the Epstein files is fading fast within the Republican Party. It’s almost as if, at the crucial moment, when action was actually needed, the commitment to transparency and justice… well, it vanished. This shift is hardly surprising to anyone who has been watching the political landscape. We’re talking about a party that increasingly appears to prioritize loyalty to certain figures, and perhaps, financial benefactors, over any semblance of principle.
GOP support erodes for Epstein files petition. The sudden change of heart, the backpedaling, it’s becoming a familiar pattern.… Continue reading
Victims of Jeffrey Epstein spoke publicly on Capitol Hill, advocating for the full release of Epstein’s files. Lawmakers hosted a bipartisan press conference demanding government transparency, including details regarding President Donald Trump’s association with Epstein. One survivor, Chauntae Davies, claimed Epstein and Trump were “very close,” a detail Trump has tried to distance himself from. Former casino boss Jack O’Donnell stated that he told Trump his association with Epstein was not a good look.
Read More
A Justice Department staffer was secretly recorded stating the department would redact all Republican names from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation files before their release. The staffer, speaking to an undercover operative, indicated that only the names of liberal Democrats would remain visible in the files, despite the administration’s claim of transparency in providing the files to Capitol Hill. The Justice Department has since confirmed the video’s authenticity while denying the staffer’s claims, stating his comments were based on media reports and lacked knowledge of the review process. The incident has fueled conservative backlash over the administration’s handling of the Epstein files, with a House Oversight Committee subpoena and legal action being taken to ensure the material’s release.
Read More
Speaking to the President, one Epstein survivor directly invited Donald Trump to the Capitol to meet them in person, emphasizing the reality of their trauma and the falsehood of claims that it is a hoax. Another survivor, making her public debut, urged the President to listen and pass the vote, reiterating that their experiences would not be silenced. Despite the release of documents, Trump and his Justice Department have been criticized for failing to provide the promised transparency to the victims and the public, and potentially backfiring as the Epstein files re-enter the news cycle.
Read More
GOP leaders urging Republicans not to sign the Epstein discharge petition. Well, that’s a headline that really makes you stop and think, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of thing that grabs your attention and forces you to question what’s really going on beneath the surface. When you hear that key figures within the Republican party are actively discouraging their members from supporting a move to release government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, it raises a whole lot of red flags. It certainly seems like something is being hidden.
Why would GOP leaders want to prevent the release of information about Epstein?… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker