Massie says he has the signatures to force US House vote on releasing Epstein files, and the anticipation is palpable. The news, coming from a community forum in rural Kentucky, signals a potential turning point in the long-running saga of the Epstein files. Massie, who’s been spearheading this effort, believes the results of a recent special House election in Arizona provide the final push needed. With both candidates in that election having pledged support for his discharge petition, he’s confident he now has the required 218 signatures to trigger a vote. It’s a moment many have been waiting for, and the implications are significant.… Continue reading
Dangerous misinformation about medicine spreads quickly when checks and balances are absent, emphasizing the importance of organizations dedicated to scientific accuracy and public health. The article appeals to readers to join or renew their membership to help support the organization’s mission of providing factual journalism. Initial support helped the organization to thrive. With continued financial backing, the organization can strengthen its ability to combat misinformation and keep the public well-informed.
Read More
DOJ quietly removes study showing right wing attacks ‘outpace’ those by left
The revelation that the Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly removed a study from its website highlighting the disparity between right-wing and left-wing domestic terrorism is, frankly, concerning. The study, conducted by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), reportedly showed a significant imbalance, with right-wing incidents far outpacing those originating from the left. The very act of removing such research raises eyebrows and invites questions about transparency and the potential suppression of inconvenient truths. The fact that the archived version of the study is still accessible via the Wayback Machine, a digital preservation tool, is a testament to the enduring power of the internet and the difficulty of completely erasing information.… Continue reading
FBI director says he’s never spoken to Trump about the Epstein files – the implication is clear: a denial of any direct communication about the potentially damaging contents within those files. It’s a statement that, if false, would be a blatant disregard for truth and a potential indicator of a larger cover-up. The immediate reaction appears to be skepticism, and frankly, it’s hard to blame anyone for that. Given the complexities surrounding the Epstein case and the involvement, real or perceived, of powerful figures, the notion that such a conversation never occurred seems, at best, unlikely.
The core issue is trust, or more accurately, the lack thereof.… Continue reading
FBI chief Patel says ‘no credible information’ others involved in Epstein crimes, and frankly, the whole thing feels like a bad joke. The idea that, after everything we know, the FBI chief can casually declare there’s “no credible information” implicating anyone else in Epstein’s crimes is, at the very least, eyebrow-raising. It’s like he’s actively trying to provoke the public. Where’s the credibility coming from, exactly? Because from this perspective, it sounds a lot like someone’s getting talking points ready to go.
And if there’s truly no credible information, why the secrecy? Why the continued redactions and delays in releasing the full files?… Continue reading
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, FBI Director Kash Patel stated that case files contain “no credible information” to suggest Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to anyone other than himself. This response came in answer to questioning from Senator John Kennedy, who was inquiring about the contents of the Epstein files. Patel stated that the available case files are limited, as they only contain search warrants from 2006 and 2007, as federal prosecutors made a deal with Epstein to avoid prosecution for earlier crimes. Despite calls for more transparency, the FBI maintains that the investigation only implicates Epstein himself.
Read More
Former President Donald Trump suggested changing the current quarterly earnings report system to a semiannual one, citing potential cost savings and a focus on long-term company management. This proposal, contingent on SEC approval, echoes concerns raised by figures like Warren Buffett and Jamie Dimon, who have criticized the emphasis on short-term profits. While current regulations mandate quarterly reporting in the U.S., some argue that the increased transparency outweighs the drawbacks, and other global markets, like the U.K., already operate with semiannual reporting.
Read More
Despite attempts to dismiss the Epstein files, the pursuit of justice for survivors remains paramount, uniting individuals across the political spectrum. The goal is to release the full files to reveal who was involved and who has been shielded from accountability. A bipartisan discharge petition, led by the author and Representative Thomas Massie, is nearing the required signatures to force a vote on the bill to release the files. This effort is vital because the information released by the Justice Department so far is insufficient and fails to provide the transparency needed to address the widespread abuse and restore public trust.
Read More
ICE Agents Can’t Wear Masks Under Bill Passed in California, and this is definitely a move that’s sparking a lot of conversation. The very idea that a state can regulate what federal agents wear on duty is a complex one, and it’s understandable why there’s a lot of skepticism surrounding its enforceability. But, let’s break down why this law, if it sticks, is so important, and what the potential ramifications might be.
A core argument for this bill boils down to transparency and accountability. The underlying sentiment is that if you’re a public servant, especially in a position of authority like law enforcement, you shouldn’t be hiding your face.… Continue reading
The Senate voted to block an amendment from Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer that would have made documents from the Jeffrey Epstein case publicly available. This mirrored a similar House effort to release Epstein-related records and sparked bipartisan support. Despite these calls for transparency, Senate Republicans, led by the Senate Majority Leader, called the amendment a “stunt” and voted to table it. The narrow vote highlighted the challenges of bipartisan cooperation and the ongoing debate about balancing transparency with protecting investigations and sensitive information.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker