Seven Republican House members voted against an amendment that would have forced a congressional vote regarding the release of Jeffrey Epstein files, a motion proposed by Democrat Ro Khanna. This amendment aimed to compel Attorney General Pam Bondi to preserve and release all related records to the Epstein case. The vote, which saw one Republican join Democrats in support, was initiated after a Justice Department memo contradicted earlier statements about the existence of a client list. This move has sparked controversy and concern among certain groups who suspect a cover-up related to the Epstein case.
Read More
In a recent development, House Republicans blocked a Democratic lawmaker’s attempt to compel the Trump administration to release all unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files. Representative Ro Khanna introduced an amendment to the GENIUS Act, which would have required Attorney General Pam Bondi to disclose the records within a month. The House Rules Committee voted against the proposal, with only one Republican supporting it, sparking outrage from Democrats who believe the public deserves full transparency. The decision has intensified scrutiny over the handling of the Epstein investigation, particularly regarding alleged involvement from the Trump administration.
Read More
Republican lawmakers on the House Rules Committee voted against a Democratic amendment that would have allowed Congress to vote on whether to release files related to the death and investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. The amendment, put forth by Congressman Ro Khanna, sought to force Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish the documents. The Epstein case has ignited political controversy, with the Justice Department’s recent findings and claims from figures like Elon Musk adding fuel to the fire. Ultimately, the Republican decision prevented a vote on public access to the files.
Read More
Senator Ron Wyden has introduced the VISIBLE Act of 2025, legislation mandating that immigration enforcement officers display clear identification during public actions. The bill aims to prevent officers from concealing their identities with unmarked gear and face coverings, requiring visible identification, including agency name and last name or badge number, from at least 25 feet. Criticizing previous administrations, Wyden highlighted the need for transparency, emphasizing that anonymous enforcement undermines democratic oversight. The proposed legislation, co-sponsored by other Democratic senators and endorsed by organizations like the ACLU, seeks to address public fear and confusion stemming from unidentified officers.
Read More
House GOP blocks Dem maneuver to force release of Epstein files. This is the headline, and it immediately raises a host of questions, doesn’t it? Why would the House GOP want to block the release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, a man whose crimes involved the exploitation and abuse of minors? It’s a pretty straightforward question, and the answer is anything but.
The core of the matter is this: Democrats attempted a maneuver to compel the release of documents related to the Epstein case. This could include lists of names, flight logs, visitor records – potentially anything that could shed light on the network of individuals who associated with Epstein.… Continue reading
Texas Governor Greg Abbott is seeking to keep communications with Elon Musk and his companies private, citing concerns about privacy, potential embarrassment, and the impact on open decision-making. The Texas Newsroom requested the emails to examine Musk’s influence in the state. However, the Governor’s office has requested a ruling from the Texas Attorney General to withhold the records, citing the “common-law privacy” exception, and potentially commercial interests. Legal experts like Bill Aleshire are critical of the move. The Attorney General’s office has 45 business days to decide.
Read More
In an effort to track Elon Musk’s influence in Texas, The Texas Newsroom requested emails between Governor Greg Abbott and Musk, as well as representatives from the tech mogul’s companies. Initially, the Governor’s office charged for the records but after payment, claimed all records were confidential. They cited reasons such as private exchanges with lawyers, details about policy-making decisions, and information revealing how the state entices companies to invest. Experts have criticized the use of “common-law privacy” to withhold these records, especially given a recent Texas Supreme Court ruling that provides limited recourse for those seeking these public records.
Read More
In a recent interview, Rep. Jamie Raskin discussed the pressing need to release the sealed files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Raskin emphasized the importance of ending the files’ potential use as a political tool and to ascertain the presence of substantive information, potentially involving the Trump administration. He believes the public deserves transparency to understand the scope of Epstein’s activities and the potential involvement of public figures. The congressman feels this release is crucial for public interest and accountability.
Read More
Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) has announced plans to force a House vote demanding the full, unredacted release of all documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. This amendment would compel the Speaker to bring the measure to a roll-call vote, putting every member of Congress on record regarding the matter. The move follows the recent halt in further document releases by the Justice Department, led by Trump-appointed officials. The goal is to increase transparency and hold both Congress and the DOJ accountable while also putting pressure on those who are trying to avoid scrutiny.
Read More
The Trump administration has reversed course on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files after previously promising transparency. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have now stated that there is no incriminating client list and that no further disclosure will be made, despite prior claims of having and being ready to release the files. This change of stance, coinciding with Trump’s agitated reactions to questions about Epstein, raises questions about his connections to the billionaire. Given Epstein’s close relationship with Trump and alleged ties to intelligence, the sudden shift in the administration’s position suggests a potential cover-up.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood