The Environmental Protection Agency has announced a change in its approach to air pollution regulations. The agency will no longer calculate the monetary value of health benefits, such as avoided healthcare costs and prevented deaths, when assessing rules for fine particulate matter and ozone, focusing instead on costs to industry. This shift, part of a broader business-friendly realignment, has drawn criticism from environmental and public health advocates who view it as a dangerous abandonment of the agency’s core mission to protect public health. While the EPA insists it remains committed to its mission and will still quantify emissions, critics argue that the change could lead to weakened safeguards, potentially allowing increased pollution and disregarding the value of lives saved and health benefits.
Read More
Spain orders Airbnb to pull thousands of unlicensed property ads: Officials say listings violated consumer laws and contributed to rising housing costs in tourist-heavy cities. This is a big move by Spain, and it’s something that definitely catches your attention. It’s a clear signal that the government is cracking down on the short-term rental market, and specifically, the impact that Airbnb is having. The removal of over 65,000 unlicensed ads is a significant number, and it suggests a widespread issue of properties being rented out without proper permits and adhering to local regulations.
The main reason for this action, as stated by officials, is that these listings violated consumer laws.… Continue reading
Social media companies have expressed strong opposition to Australia’s new regulations, arguing the ban could harm children by limiting their access and connectivity. Tech giants like Meta, Snapchat, and YouTube have voiced concerns, citing potential negative impacts on youth and parental control. However, former Facebook Australia chief Stephen Scheeler views the legislation as a “seat belt moment,” akin to safety advancements in other industries, suggesting that even imperfect regulation is preferable to the previous lack of oversight due to the negative aspects.
Read More
A Yukon couple was awarded $10,000 in small claims court after Air Canada’s overbooking led to a three-day travel ordeal. The airline repeatedly breached Air Passenger Protection Regulations, failing to provide promised alternative flights and adequate communication, resulting in lost vacation time and additional expenses. The judge deemed Air Canada’s actions “shameful,” highlighting the airline’s failure to fulfill its duty of care and utilize human oversight in its booking system. This decision emphasizes the need for improved airline communication and accountability under the existing regulations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood