During a White House meeting, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney firmly rejected President Trump’s repeated proposals to make Canada the 51st U.S. state, stating that Canada is “not for sale.” Trump, while acknowledging Carney’s position, countered with his characteristic “never say never.” Despite this disagreement, both leaders maintained a polite demeanor, and Trump claimed the rejection wouldn’t hinder trade talks. However, Trump’s prior comments on Truth Social highlighted his longstanding grievances regarding the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and its perceived unfair advantages.
Read More
President Trump reiterated his interest in making Canada the 51st state, citing substantial U.S. subsidies to Canada and the aesthetic appeal of a unified North America. While he dismissed the use of military force against Canada, he refused to rule out such action regarding Greenland, emphasizing its strategic importance for national and international security. Trump’s pursuit of Greenland, coupled with economic pressures, significantly impacted recent Canadian federal elections. Despite speaking with Canadian Prime Minister Carney, Trump affirmed his intention to continue advocating for Canadian statehood.
Read More
Trump’s continued musings about annexing Canada and Greenland, while simultaneously declaring an attack on Canada “highly unlikely,” present a perplexing and frankly unsettling scenario. The casual dismissal of a potential invasion of a long-standing ally is deeply troubling, especially given the historical context of mutual support and cooperation between the nations.
The sheer audacity of even suggesting such a thing is alarming. It undermines the foundation of trust that should underpin international relations, and invites distrust and concern from Canada and other global partners. The statement’s chilling implications are amplified by the absence of any apparent justification or explanation. Such flippant pronouncements, devoid of rational basis, only serve to heighten apprehension.… Continue reading
In a recent interview, President Trump refused to rule out the use of military force to acquire Greenland, citing its strategic importance and potential mineral wealth. This statement follows his repeated expressions of interest in expanding US territory into Greenland, a position met with significant international criticism. He also discussed the possibility of annexing Canada, claiming that it would be economically advantageous to the US, despite significant Canadian and American public opposition to such a move. Trump’s comments regarding both Greenland and Canada have sparked widespread debate and concern.
Read More
Trump mostly — but not entirely — rules out military action on Canada. This statement, however, is far from reassuring. The very fact that he’s even considering it, let alone vaguely hinting at the possibility, sends shivers down the spines of many. It’s not just the sheer audacity of the idea – invading a peaceful, allied nation like Canada – but the unpredictable nature of the man himself that fuels this unease. His words shift like desert sands; today’s bluster might be tomorrow’s retraction, leaving a trail of uncertainty and apprehension in its wake.
The notion of military action against Canada seems absurd, a ludicrous fantasy bordering on the insane.… Continue reading
This Shopping Trends report is editorially independent from CTV News. The team may receive commissions from purchases made through affiliate links. For more information, please see our “About Us” section.
Read More
Trump Won’t Add Canada, Greenland or Panama to US Territory, Carney Says
The idea of Donald Trump annexing Canada, Greenland, or Panama to the United States is, frankly, absurd. While it’s tempting to engage in speculative scenarios, the reality is far less dramatic. This isn’t a serious geopolitical threat; it’s more akin to a provocative statement that’s been misinterpreted and blown out of proportion.
The notion that Trump would seriously pursue such actions seems highly unlikely, considering the logistical and political complexities involved. Annexation of a country, even one like Panama, with its existing infrastructure and governmental system, is not a simple act of acquisition.… Continue reading
This website is best viewed with a modern, secure web browser. Using an outdated browser poses significant security risks. For optimal performance and safety, users are urged to upgrade to a supported browser such as Chrome, Firefox, or Edge. Failure to update may result in limited functionality and vulnerability to online threats. A list of recommended browsers is provided for user convenience.
Read More
On Canada’s election day, Donald Trump reiterated his desire for Canada to become the 51st U.S. state, promising significant economic benefits and military support. This statement, made on Truth Social, ignores both candidates’ rejection of such a proposal, and their differing economic and military plans. Trump’s comments, echoing previous statements questioning the Canada-U.S. border’s legitimacy, are likely to influence the election outcome, particularly given the current close race between Prime Minister Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre.
Read More
Canada is experiencing its largest measles outbreak since 1998, driven largely by low vaccination rates among affected individuals. Over 90% of cases involve those unvaccinated or with unknown vaccination status, with approximately 9% requiring hospitalization. Health officials are urging Manitobans to check their immunization records and utilize readily available vaccines. National Immunization Awareness Week emphasizes the continued importance of vaccination in preventing further spread.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood