Attorney Pam Bondi is advocating for the continued concealment of Volume II of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report regarding Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. Bondi asserts that this section contains privileged and confidential information, therefore should not be released to the public. This legal move comes as Trump seeks to block the release of the files, citing concerns about sensitive grand jury materials and protected information. Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, is overseeing the case, while Smith testified about proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Trump’s guilt.
Read More
The second group, comprised of corporate leaders and business executives, chooses silence due to fear of retribution or the desire for tax cuts, evident in their financial support of Trump. Right-wing media outlets, acting as Trump’s propaganda arms, are driven by a combination of financial gain and genuine hatred of liberals, leading them to defend Trump while demonizing the opposition. Finally, the MAGA faithful encompasses a range of supporters, including soft supporters with diverse motivations who don’t necessarily view Trump as a savior.
Read More
Newly released transcripts reveal that former special counsel Jack Smith was largely prevented from discussing his Mar-a-Lago classified documents investigation due to an injunction from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. Smith, despite his willingness, avoided delving into the specifics of his final report, even declining to review it before his closed-door testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. He cited the fear of violating Cannon’s order as the primary reason for his reticence, emphasizing his commitment to upholding the court’s directives. Smith’s reluctance underscores the constraints imposed upon him by the ongoing legal challenges, even as the cases against Trump’s co-defendants have been dismissed.
Read More
Lawyers trying to bench Aileen Cannon from the case, arguing she’s been in Trump’s corner one too many times, is the crux of the situation. It’s not just that she appears to favor him; it’s the repeated disregard for established legal principles and precedents. This isn’t just a matter of opinion; it’s about the consistent perception of bias and the potential for her actions to undermine the integrity of the legal process.
Aileen Cannon’s conduct has raised serious questions about her impartiality. The fact that she was appointed by Trump, and seemingly with the expectation of loyalty, is a major factor.… Continue reading
Judge Aileen Cannon is set to play a pivotal role in the ongoing investigations surrounding Donald Trump. She is expected to preside over a special grand jury investigating the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, as well as potential plots against Trump, and could oversee trials of his perceived enemies. Cannon’s previous decisions, including her handling of Trump’s classified documents case, have sparked controversy and fueled speculation about her influence on Trump’s retribution campaign. Despite criticism and concerns regarding her judicial approach, Cannon has remained steadfast in her decisions.
Read More
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are requesting Judge Aileen Cannon release the portion of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concerning the prosecution of Donald Trump for allegedly hiding classified documents. This request comes after charges against co-defendants were dropped, removing the basis for the earlier order to keep the report sealed. The Democrats, led by Jamie Raskin, argue there is no legal reason to withhold the report, especially with Smith scheduled to testify about its contents in a closed-door deposition. While Cannon’s response is uncertain, the Democrats’ actions may influence her decision, potentially leading to further actions if the party regains the House majority.
Read More
In 2023, a 40-count felony indictment was brought against Trump concerning the handling of classified documents after his presidency. Despite the government’s attempts to retrieve the documents before initiating a criminal investigation, and even after the investigation began, Trump allegedly refused to return them and attempted to obstruct the investigation. This case was ultimately dismissed when Trump won the election in 2024. Consequently, it is unlikely Trump will face repercussions for his actions, as he continues to attack those who investigated him.
Read More
Ryan Routh, the suspect in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, has been barred from accessing classified information related to his case due to national security concerns. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon granted the government’s request for a protective order, citing the potential for “serious damage” if the information were disclosed. The Justice Department, invoking the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), argued that the classified material’s disclosure could harm national security. Routh, who is representing himself, is scheduled for trial in September and faces multiple charges, including firearm violations, with prosecutors seeking to exclude potentially irrelevant evidence he intends to present.
Read More
A federal judge blocked the Justice Department from releasing to Congress the portion of Jack Smith’s report detailing his classified documents investigation of President Trump. Judge Aileen Cannon granted a request from Trump’s co-defendants, citing concerns that the release would prejudice their ongoing criminal proceedings. She rejected the Justice Department’s argument that releasing the report was a historical practice, emphasizing the lack of congressional subpoenas or pending legislation related to the report. The judge found the Department’s justification insufficient and determined that congressional access would likely lead to public dissemination of sensitive information.
Read More
Judge Aileen Cannon denied a request to extend an injunction preventing the Justice Department from releasing a portion of Jack Smith’s report detailing President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This allows the report’s release, barring further legal action, while a separate section concerning classified documents remains under injunction pending a Friday hearing. A Justice Department motion to immediately release the January 6th-related portion is still awaiting a ruling from the 11th Circuit. The report’s release comes days before Trump’s inauguration, despite his denial of wrongdoing and prior indictments.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood