In 2023, a 40-count felony indictment was brought against Trump concerning the handling of classified documents after his presidency. Despite the government’s attempts to retrieve the documents before initiating a criminal investigation, and even after the investigation began, Trump allegedly refused to return them and attempted to obstruct the investigation. This case was ultimately dismissed when Trump won the election in 2024. Consequently, it is unlikely Trump will face repercussions for his actions, as he continues to attack those who investigated him.
Read More
Ryan Routh, the suspect in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, has been barred from accessing classified information related to his case due to national security concerns. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon granted the government’s request for a protective order, citing the potential for “serious damage” if the information were disclosed. The Justice Department, invoking the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA), argued that the classified material’s disclosure could harm national security. Routh, who is representing himself, is scheduled for trial in September and faces multiple charges, including firearm violations, with prosecutors seeking to exclude potentially irrelevant evidence he intends to present.
Read More
A federal judge blocked the Justice Department from releasing to Congress the portion of Jack Smith’s report detailing his classified documents investigation of President Trump. Judge Aileen Cannon granted a request from Trump’s co-defendants, citing concerns that the release would prejudice their ongoing criminal proceedings. She rejected the Justice Department’s argument that releasing the report was a historical practice, emphasizing the lack of congressional subpoenas or pending legislation related to the report. The judge found the Department’s justification insufficient and determined that congressional access would likely lead to public dissemination of sensitive information.
Read More
Judge Aileen Cannon denied a request to extend an injunction preventing the Justice Department from releasing a portion of Jack Smith’s report detailing President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This allows the report’s release, barring further legal action, while a separate section concerning classified documents remains under injunction pending a Friday hearing. A Justice Department motion to immediately release the January 6th-related portion is still awaiting a ruling from the 11th Circuit. The report’s release comes days before Trump’s inauguration, despite his denial of wrongdoing and prior indictments.
Read More
Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on his investigation into Donald Trump, pending a decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. This decision, which followed a request by Trump co-defendants, prevents the Justice Department from releasing the report, except for limited information shared with Congressional committees. Legal experts criticized Cannon’s order, arguing she lacks jurisdiction and her actions demonstrate bias, while Trump’s allies praised the decision. The Justice Department plans to release portions of the report concerning election interference only after the Eleventh Circuit rules on the matter.
Read More
Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, temporarily blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report investigating President-elect Trump, prompting immediate criticism. This action follows Cannon’s earlier dismissal of the classified documents case against Trump. Legal analyst Lisa Rubin argued Cannon lacks jurisdiction to issue such a stay, given her prior ruling. The stay remains in effect until three days after the appeals court rules on the matter, a timeline raising questions about its potential duration beyond Trump’s inauguration. The report’s release is opposed by Trump and his co-defendants.
Read More
Judge Aileen Cannon blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report investigating President-elect Trump, halting a process that would typically involve Attorney General Merrick Garland’s oversight. This action follows Trump’s legal victories, including a ruling deeming Smith’s appointment unconstitutional and a Supreme Court decision granting broad presidential immunity. Trump’s former co-defendants, Nauta and De Oliveira, successfully argued that the report’s release would prejudice their ongoing cases, prompting the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to review Cannon’s order. The report’s public release is now delayed pending the appeals court’s decision.
Read More
The news that Aileen Cannon is being considered as a candidate for Attorney General under Donald Trump is nothing short of mind-boggling. It feels like we are witnessing a live-action illustration of the words “insane” echoing through the corridors of American governance. The implications of such a move are staggering. Cannon already has a track record of loyalty to Trump, including her dismissal of federal charges against him regarding the mishandling of classified documents. This relationship raises many ethical and constitutional concerns.
Cannon’s potential elevation to AG appears to be a form of reward for her judicial decisions that have repeatedly favored Trump, creating a dangerous precedent where the independence of the judiciary is overshadowed by partisan politics.… Continue reading
Aileen Cannon’s Trump Ruling Likely to Be Reversed: Attorney
A situation like the one surrounding Aileen Cannon’s ruling on the Trump case is one that truly pushes the boundaries of what we expect from the justice system. As an attorney myself, I cannot help but be taken aback by the blatant disregard for established legal precedent and the seemingly biased nature of Cannon’s decision. The fact that a district judge could dismiss a case based on such flimsy grounds is a concerning indication of the state of our judicial system.
The arguments put forth by US attorney Joyce Vance in Smith’s brief clearly outlined the statutory authority for appointing him, drawing on significant legal precedents to support their case.… Continue reading
As I sit here reflecting on the recent news regarding Jack Smith’s appeal potentially leading to the dismissal of Judge Aileen Cannon, I am left feeling a mix of emotions. On one hand, I am heartened by the possibility of accountability finally catching up to someone who has seemingly abused their position of power. On the other hand, I am deeply disheartened by the realization that our justice system may have been compromised by individuals more invested in political allegiances than upholding the rule of law.
The idea that a judge, whose primary duty is to remain impartial and uphold justice, could be swayed by personal bias is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker