Ahead of a Monday meeting in Washington, French President Emmanuel Macron plans to urge President Trump to adopt a strong stance against Vladimir Putin, emphasizing that weakness towards Russia is against both American and European interests. Macron believes that Trump’s unpredictable approach could strategically benefit the West in negotiations, creating uncertainty for Putin. However, any peace deal must involve Ukraine and European partners, preventing a surrender that could embolden Russia further. Macron also voiced support for increased European defense spending and the potential deployment of French troops as part of a post-conflict security force in Ukraine.
Read More
This article revisits a 2018 claim suggesting Russian leverage over Donald Trump, potentially dating back to a 1987 Moscow trip. The author’s initial assessment of Russian influence was around 10-20%, now raised to over 50% based on Trump’s subsequent pro-Russia stances and confirmation from a former KGB spy. While the full extent of this influence remains unknown, the author now believes that even definitive proof would have had limited impact on public opinion or Trump’s political standing, mirroring the muted reaction to previously confirmed Russian kompromat. Ultimately, Trump’s inherent weaknesses and incompetence undermined any significant leverage Russia may have held.
Read More
As the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion approaches, Ukraine faces a new threat: waning U.S. support fueled by Donald Trump’s pro-Russia rhetoric and calls for a swift ceasefire favorable to Moscow. Despite initial concerns about internal divisions, Trump’s attacks on President Zelenskyy have paradoxically unified Ukrainians, even among political opponents. This comes as Ukrainian forces, exhausted and facing slow but steady Russian advances, remain committed to the fight despite potential cuts in funding and weaponry. The conflict highlights a dangerous alignment between Trump’s stance and Russia’s goals, potentially jeopardizing Ukraine’s sovereignty and undermining the efforts to achieve a just peace.
Read More
Despite some Western companies considering a return to Russia post-war, the Russian government is prioritizing domestic businesses and isn’t eagerly awaiting their return. Officials have stated that there will be consequences for past decisions, emphasizing a focus on domestic and Eurasian Economic Union companies. While some Western firms may be tempted by potential opportunities, concerns about staff safety, rule of law, and reputational damage remain significant deterrents. The current Russian economic climate, marked by high inflation and a challenging energy market, further complicates the appeal of re-entering the market.
Read More
Trump’s potential abandonment of the international effort to prosecute Russia for war crimes in Ukraine is deeply disturbing. The sheer magnitude of the alleged crimes – from the bombing of hospitals to the execution of prisoners of war, the rape and torture of civilians, and the deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure – demand accountability. The idea that these atrocities could go unpunished is horrifying.
This decision, if finalized, would send a chilling message globally, signaling that such flagrant violations of international law can be ignored by a major world power. It would effectively embolden authoritarian regimes and embolden future aggression.
The implications extend far beyond Ukraine.… Continue reading
In a Fox News interview, President Trump acknowledged Russia’s attack on Ukraine but argued the war was avoidable. He blamed both President Biden and President Zelensky for escalating the conflict through poor decisions and a failure to negotiate effectively. Trump criticized Zelensky’s rejection of a U.S. rare earth mineral deal and his overall negotiating tactics, claiming Zelensky lacked leverage. Trump ultimately asserted that Zelensky’s actions contributed to the war’s outbreak and Ukraine’s current state.
Read More
Former Trump advisor Steve Bannon recently made headlines for a peculiar hand gesture during a speech advocating for a third Trump presidential term. The gesture, described as a questionable salute, accompanied his call for the former president’s return to office. Bannon’s actions sparked immediate controversy and further fueled debate surrounding Trump’s political future. This event highlights the ongoing polarization within the Republican party and the continued influence of figures like Bannon. The incident has generated widespread discussion and analysis of political symbolism and rhetoric.
Read More
As the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion approaches, Ukraine faces a new threat: waning U.S. support fueled by Donald Trump’s pro-Russia rhetoric and calls for a ceasefire favorable to Moscow. Despite Trump’s accusations and the resulting uncertainty, Ukrainians remain largely united behind President Zelenskyy, even some opposition figures defending his postponement of elections during wartime. This shift in U.S. policy coincides with escalating exhaustion among Ukrainian soldiers and civilians, coupled with Russia’s continued advances. The potential for U.S.-Russia collaboration on a peace deal without Ukrainian input is deeply concerning, prompting anxieties about a compromised resolution to the conflict.
Read More
The US will not co-sponsor a UN motion backing Ukraine, a decision that has sparked widespread outrage and concern. This refusal, viewed by many as a betrayal of a key ally, reflects a profound shift in US foreign policy, leaving many questioning the country’s commitment to international cooperation and democratic values. The implications are far-reaching, potentially destabilizing global alliances and undermining the credibility of the UN itself.
This controversial decision has fueled accusations that the current US administration is acting in concert with Russia. The perception of a pro-Russian stance within the US government is not only deeply alarming but also fuels speculation about the extent of Russian influence within the highest levels of power.… Continue reading
The United States’ refusal to co-sponsor a UN resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marks a significant shift in its foreign policy. This decision, coupled with the U.S. opposition to directly labeling Russia as the aggressor in a G7 statement, contrasts with previous consistent support for Ukraine. The move follows recent diplomatic overtures to Russia and controversial statements by former President Trump questioning Ukraine’s leadership and suggesting resource-based repayment for military aid. These actions have sparked concern amongst Ukrainian officials and European allies regarding the future of U.S. support. The UN resolution, while able to proceed without U.S. backing, may face challenges in garnering widespread support.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood