Internet Explorer 11 is no longer supported on the website. Users attempting to access the site via IE11 will experience a degraded or non-functional experience. To ensure the best possible user experience, visitors are strongly encouraged to use a different, modern web browser. This will allow for optimal performance and access to all features available on the site.
Following peaceful protests, former President Trump released an AI-generated video depicting himself as a king, attacking detractors with excrement, a move widely perceived as mocking dissent. Despite the offensive imagery, House Speaker Johnson defended the video as satirical, using it to falsely accuse protestors of hatred and violence. Other Republican figures, like Rep. Chip Roy, further escalated the rhetoric, labeling critics as enemies and invoking religious justifications. This response, along with similar reactions from Vice President Vance and White House staff, encapsulates what has been described as a disturbing and bizarre form of official communication.
Amidst nationwide “No Kings” protests, President Trump shared an AI-generated video depicting a fighter jet dropping excrement on protestors. While news outlets employed euphemisms, the video’s imagery, seemingly intended to mock and demean protestors, has faced a hesitation from certain media outlets to accurately describe the graphic content. This reluctance to use plain language underscores a broader concern about accurately conveying information in an era of deceptive online content and the normalization of hostility. The article concludes that this failure to accurately describe the imagery goes beyond the lack of discussion regarding the excrement itself, and is a detriment to our ability to accurately interpret the increasing misinformation across the internet.
Speaker Mike Johnson faced backlash for defending former President Donald Trump’s use of an AI-generated video depicting him dropping sewage on protesters. Johnson characterized the video as satirical, a method Trump uses effectively on social media to make a point. Critics quickly refuted this interpretation, arguing the video was not satire but debasement, and questioned the point Trump was attempting to convey. Democrats and other commentators, like Rep. Sean Casten, criticized Johnson’s defense of Trump’s actions, calling it juvenile and questionable.
President Donald Trump shared a peculiar AI-generated video on Truth Social late Saturday. The 19-second clip depicts Trump, wearing a crown, piloting a fighter jet labeled “King Trump,” and dropping excrement onto a target that is revealed to be New York City and “No Kings” protesters. The video incorporates footage of left-wing influencer Harry Sisson and other protesters, resulting in immediate criticism from political figures and confusion from those featured. The post quickly garnered attention and sparked questions about Trump’s motives for posting the AI-generated imagery.
In response to Saturday’s nationwide “No Kings” protests, Donald Trump shared an AI-generated video on Truth Social depicting him as “King Trump” dropping what appeared to be fecal matter onto protesters. The video, set to “Danger Zone,” showed Trump in a fighter jet labeled “King Trump.” Accompanying this was another post, originally from VP JD Vance, where Trump is shown placing a crown on his head and drawing a sword. Additionally, the official White House account contributed to the response with a post featuring Trump and Vance wearing crowns.
Following President Trump’s posting of an AI-generated video, House Speaker Mike Johnson was recorded by CNN’s Manu Raju as saying, “It wasn’t my style,” in response to Rep. Madeleine Dean’s criticism. Dean called the video “disgraceful” and “racist”, urging Johnson to condemn it. Despite Johnson’s initial reluctance, he later stated he disagreed with Dean’s perspective while acknowledging her concerns as Speaker.
In a recent CNN interview, Senator Roger Marshall defended Donald Trump’s posting of an AI-generated video targeting Democratic leaders. The video depicted Hakeem Jeffries in a sombrero and an AI-dubbed Chuck Schumer making offensive statements. Marshall compared Trump’s actions to a “little boy” playing with a flashlight, suggesting the president was playfully highlighting the Democrats’ supposedly unreasonable demands. The clip’s offensive nature and potential to undermine shutdown negotiations, however, were questioned.
The social media platform Truth Social recently hosted a computer-generated video featuring Lara Trump and an AI-generated Donald Trump promoting the false “medbed” conspiracy theory. The video claimed every American would receive a “medbed card” granting access to facilities designed to restore health. The “medbed” theory, popular in far-right circles, falsely asserts that the “deep state” possesses advanced technology capable of curing any illness. While the video’s origin is unknown, it appears to have originated from an Instagram account associated with a fake name often used in romance scams.
Donald Trump shared a video on Truth Social depicting a fabricated arrest of Barack Obama by the FBI, complete with a prison sequence. The video, which incorporates the phrase “No One Is Above The Law” and features a soundtrack reminiscent of the Village People, was also circulated by others on X. This follows the previous attempts by Trump and others to discredit individuals like Samantha Power, with the video and associated commentary reflecting a larger pattern of spreading misinformation and attacking perceived political rivals.
John Q. Hosedrinker